Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kevin B. Kelley and Lloyd C. Haderlie AgraServ, Inc., American Falls, ID.
Advertisements

Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Highland Russet (A9045-7) Newest Tri-State Release General Description: Highland Russet (A9045-7) is a product of the cooperative USDA/ARS, University.
Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
An Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of GM Crop Cultivation: An Irish Case Study Marie-Louise Flannery, Fiona S. Thorne, B Paul W. Kelly and Ewen Mullins.
All content copyright © 5one All rights reserved. Confidential. Indigo Cosmetics: Yardley Skin Even Targeted Coupon May Cashback ClubCard.
INFLUENCE OF PHC PRODUCTS ON POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD PT Summary Across Studies - WA Only PRE-HARVEST APPLICATION EFFECTS ON POST-HARVEST STORAGE.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Allan W. Gray, Purdue University 2002 Farm Bill Decision Time Allan Gray Purdue University.
Economic Tools to Evaluate Culling Decisions for Breeding Cattle and Replacements.
Economic Assessment Of IPM Programs Deana Sexson University of Wisconsin, NPM Program.
Specialty Formulations Global Meeting Charles Lanfier December 2, 2014.
Public Finance (MPA405) Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal. Lecture 13: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Government Investments Public Finance.
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 Title I, Subtitles A and B Commodity Programs for Covered Commodities 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference.
Seedlot Handling and Tuber Yield Loretta Mikitzel, PhD, PAg NB Department of Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries New Brunswick Potato Conference and.
Three Year Evaluation of High Populations of Reniform Nematode On Yield and Quality of Sweet Potatoes in the Mississippi Delta Larry Adams and Craig Abel.
2014 Tech Meeting Dan Fiser. 2  Crop: Potatoes  Location: Stockton Ca  Dates: –Harvesting: July 2,2014  Objective: Evaluation of Intracept  Treatments:
Return on Investment – Internal Rate of Return By R. S. Miolla.
REGEN EARTH 1. REGEN EARTH is a US based marketing and fertilizer distribution company with the mission to develop sustainable and affordable agriculture.
Insect Control Spectrum of AERIS TM Seed-Applied System.
NRSP-6 Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin June 23, 2015 CETS Perspective.
Les Mills International Relaunch, Retention, Acquisition.
Utilization of NAA as a Seed Treatment to Control Stem Number in Russet Burbank Andrew P. Robinson, North Dakota State University / University of Minnesota.
Insecticide Application Method and Chemistry Evaluation for Sweetpotato Production in the Mississippi Delta Larry C. Adams and Randall G. Luttrell USDA-ARS,
Herbicide Trials 2002 Only one herbicide trail was conducted. Conditions were dry with heavy weed pressure which can be seen by the dramatic effect of.
Ornamental Pepper for Fall Market Objective To test if Ornamental Peppers can fit into mum production program for Fall Market.
15 July 2009 INFLUENCE OF PHC SEED AND FOLIAR TREATMENTS ON IRISH POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD Summary of Rhizoctonia Data, Holland Ag Services, Washington.
“R.O.P.” Return On Programming “R.O.I.”??. 1 case treats 226 Bushels of Wheat 1 case for 160 acres $607.52/case SRP Max Rebate of 9% ($54.68) $1/acre.
Nursery Management and Seedling Production
1 Economic Analysis of Control Options for the Western Corn Rootworm Soybean Variant in Southern Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics.
©2005 copyright, FMC Corporation. FMC confidential. Carbine TM 50WG (flonicamid) 2006 Field Efficacy Results Craig Heim Henry R. Mitchell Yemel Ortega.
Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Corn Reaps Benefits for Non- Bt Growers Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central.
 Field 1 › No noticeable effects of application on plant height or color › No Difference in treated vs. untreated plots  Field 2 › There was a significant.
Tim Woods KY Produce Growers and NAP Insurance. How county agents can help 1.Get comfortable helping walk growers through the planning tool –Evaluate.
BUSINESS MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS. LECTURE 6 Review Lecture 5 Discount Simple and compound interest Average due date, interest on drawings and calendar.
Efficacy of EMD Crop Bioscience products on cotton stand and yield M. S. Reddy, R. Bowman and R. Osburn Dept. of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn University,
Macrophyte performance as a function of platform elevation in micro- and macrotidal salt marshes Diana Rodriguez Department of Biological Sciences University.
The effect of low levels of CIPC on Seed Potato Performance John Walsh Associate Principal Scientist, Potato Storage McCain Foods Limited.
LDR 531 Week 3 Summary R-531/LDR-531-Week-3-Summary For more details
Corn Plant Population Research – Water-Limited Sites
Scott D. Stewart (project leader)
Clarke Alder, Crop Consultant, The Amalgamated Sugar Company
Manipulate broadleaf density Tend individual Sw
This brochure discusses the production and potential advantages of using grafted tomatoes for the California fresh market tomato industry, and presents.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
EVALUATION OF PLANT GROWTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS ON LOW DESERT COTTON
Improving fruit set of ‘Kordia’ and ‘Regina’ sweet cherry with AVG
Section 18 Emergency Exemption
QUALITY OF TOMATO SEEDLING IN APPLICATION BIOPRODUCTS
Question 6: Sorghum IPM System for SCA Management
3.2 Productivity Understand what is meant by productivity.
Marketing Cows for Profit. Represent 15-20% of Cow-calf income
Preliminary Performance of Hedelfingen Cherry on Ten Rootstocks in the 1998 NC-140 Sweet Cherry Rootstock Trial R.L.Perry, R. Andersen, R. Crassweller,
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
Jan Nechwatal & Michael Zellner
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
By C. Kohn Waterford Agricultural Sciences
Michael Hennessy Head of Crops and Energy Knowledge Transfer, Teagasc
Update on PLH Resistant Alfalfa
PAR Introduction.
“Why a Christmas Tree Shortage this Year?”
CANADIAN PULSE CROP REPORT AUGUST 2, 2016 KEVEN SAWCHUK
Update on Provisia & Clearfield Rice Varieties
Evangelos Gonias, Derrick Oosterhuis, Androniki Bibi and Bruce Roberts
Fertilizer and Herbicide Application
Australian Pistachios 2017 Season Review
Concurrent Session B: Horticultural Outlook
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Optimization of Strawberry Production in Fusarium Infested Soil Part 1
Presentation transcript:

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ PT-01-09 Details: Employ applied to foliage at 2.1 oz/acre in two regimes: 2 apps: end of set, and 3 weeks later (“X2”) 3 apps: end of set, 3 and 6 weeks later (“X3”) 2009 Trial Locations: Idaho: 5 Washington: 4

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ Summary Across Trials for PT-01-09 & PT-02-09 On average, the treatments had fewer stems than the untreated control. Treated plants tended to be slightly shorter than untreated plants. Average of Trials 209089, 209090, 209091, 209092, 209093, 209095, 209097, 209109.

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ Summary Across Trials for PT-01-09 & PT-02-09 Treated plants had higher early vigor than untreated plants. Treated plants had more tubers than untreated plants. Average of Trials 209089, 209090, 209091, 209092, 209093, 209095, 209097, 209109.

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ Summary Across Trials for PT-01-09 & PT-02-09 Treated plants had substantially higher gross yields than untreated plants. Treated plants had substantially higher marketable yields than untreated plants. Average of Trials 209089, 209090, 209091, 209092, 209093, 209095, 209097, 209109.

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ Summary Across Trials for PT-01-09 & PT-02-09 UTC Employ X3 Employ X2 Gross Crop Value $3,242 $3,578 $3,542 Cost of Treatment $ - $63.00 $42.00 Net Crop Value $3,546 $3,521 Net Gain $ $305 $279 ROI   9.7 13.3 The 2 application regime had a lower net gain but a higher ROI than the 3 application regime. Crop value was calculated using 2009 Idaho fresh market prices of $8.50 for US#1, $6.00 for US#2, and $2.00/cwt for usable culls; and $10.50/oz for Harpinαβ. Percent increase ranged from 7.4% to 8.7%. Average of Trials 209089, 209090, 209091, 209092, 209093, 209095, 209097, 209109.

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ Summary for PT-01-09 & PT-02-09: On Average: treatments had no statistical effect on stand, stem number, vigor and plant height treatments increased tuber set, ranging from 22% to 23% - may have been applied a bit early treatments increased gross yield, ranging from 7.4% to 7.7% treatments increased marketable yield, ranging from 8.1% to 8.7% Average of Trials 209089, 209090, 209091, 209092, 209093, 209095, 209097, 209109.

Summary: Harpin Use in Potatoes REPLICATED YIELD TRIALS WITH HARPINαβ Summary for PT-01-09 & PT-02-09: Yield increases came primarily from increased set. Marketable yields were improved more than gross yields, demonstrating an increase in quality and improved crop value. Results were very similar to those seen with the timing trials and grower trials done with HarpinEa Comments? – Questions? Average of Trials 209089, 209090, 209091, 209092, 209093, 209095, 209097, 209109.