Quality System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop Washington D.C. September 27-29, 2006
Advertisements

Why does PAT need Rapid Microbiology Methods? S.Lonardi, P.J.Newby, D.Ribeiro, B.Johnson PAT Subcommittee meeting October 23, 2002.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
VALIDATION What is the new guidance?. What is a Compliance Policy Guide? Explain FDA policy on regulatory issues CGMP regulations and application commitments.
©2006 OLC 1 Process Management: The Foundation for Achieving Organizational Excellence Process Management Implementation Worldwide.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
The Pharmaceutical Industry and ICH Q9
What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.
Perspectives on New Paradigms of Risk and Compliance in Pharmaceutical Development: Quality by Design, PAT, and Design Space David J. Cummings OPS Quality.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Office of New Drug Chemistry (ONDC)
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLS ACPS March 12-13, 2003 Stephen K. Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team Leader CDER/Office of New Drug Chemistry Co-Chair, Comparability.
Pilot Risk-Ranking Model to Prioritize Manufacturing Sites for GMP Inspections Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Manufacturing Subcommittee.
Quality Improvement Systematic approach to reduction or elimination of waste, work-back flow, rework, and losses in production process.
Final Report on Process Analytical Technology (PAT) and Manufacturing Science Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office of Pharmaceutical Science,
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
1 Revisions to 21 CFR Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application PhRMA Perspective FDA Public Meeting – 7 Feb 2007.
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Andrea Pranti.
Quality By Design - A Generic Industry Perspective
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Risk-Based CMC Review Paradigm
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Changes without Prior Approval Breakout Session Summary Rick Smith Aventis Pasteur, Inc.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences CDER, FDA October 21, 2003 Welcome and Introduction to the Meeting.
ACPS Manufacturing Subcommittee Report October 19, 2004 Judy P. Boehlert, Ph.D. Chair.
The Science of Quality By Design Janet Woodcock, M.D. May 19, 2004.
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory.
Quality by Design (QbD) Myth : An expensive development tool ! Fact : A tool that makes product development and commercial scale manufacturing simple !
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
1 An Update on ICH Guideline Q8 – Pharmaceutical Development FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science: 5 Oct 2006 Dr John C Berridge Senior Regulatory.
Quality by Design & Question-Based Review: Observations by the Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5,
Challenges and Opportunities in Enhancement of the CMC Section of NDAs: Quality – by - Design Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
1 Basis of the Proposed Tactical Plan for a QbD approach for Quality Control and Assurance of Dissolution Rate Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director,
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Risk-Based CMC Review - OGD Perspective Gary J. Buehler, R.Ph. Director Office of Generic Drugs July 21, 2004 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
10:00 A.M. – Noon 7 June 2004 ICH Quality Plenary Meeting.
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
1 Office of Pharmaceutical Science on Jon Clark FDA/CDER/OPS Associate Director for Policy Development.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Subcommittee of the ACPS Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. ACPS Meeting October 22, 2002.
ICH Quality Topics Update
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
Comparability Protocols Nancy Sager Associate Director, QIS-Chemistry FDA/CDER/OPS.
Second Meeting of the FDA/ACPS Process Analytical Technology: Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Drug Quality Regulations for the 21 st Century PhRMA Perspective Manufacturing Subcommittee Meeting – May 21, 2003 Gerry Migliaccio Pfizer Inc.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22-23, 2008 Introduction and Update Helen N. Winkle Director, Office of.
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Total Quality Management Pharmaceuticals. MEDICINE/pharmaceuticals Medicine / Brand/ Product.
GMP -Regulatory Perspective Sukanti Borkar Abbott India Ltd.
An Update on ICH Guideline – Pharmaceutical Development
The Information Professional’s Role in Product Safety
Pharmaceutical Quality in the 21st Century
Data Managers’ Forum What’s in it for us?
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Overview June 10, 2006.
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Presentation transcript:

Quality System

PAT Initiative July 2001 CGMP for 21st Century Initiative Medical Innovation Critical Path Initiative “Desired State”

policies and standards Dimensions of the FDA’s Initiative on Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century Strong Public Health Protection Integrated quality systems orientation Science-based policies and standards Risk-based orientation International cooperation Time

Directional Vectors Ensure regulatory review and inspection policies are based on state-of-the-art pharmaceutical science Encourage new technological advances Encourage risk-based approaches that focus both industry and Agency attention on critical areas Facilitate modern quality management techniques, including implementation of quality systems Enhance the consistency and coordination of FDA's drug quality regulatory programs, in part, by integrating enhanced quality systems approaches into the Agency's business processes and regulatory policies concerning review and inspection activities

Covering the Space Defined by the Directional Vectors Preapproval Inspection Compliance Program Risk Dispute Resolution Process Pharmaceutical Inspectorate Product Specialists on Inspection Process Systems/Integration Guidance on CFR Part 11 Aseptic Processing Comparability Protocol ICH P2, QbD, & Risk PAT Science

The Scientific Opportunity Pharmaceutical (development and) manufacturing is evolving from an art form to one that is now science and engineering based. Effectively using this knowledge in regulatory decisions in establishing specifications and evaluating manufacturing processes can substantially improve the efficiency of both manufacturing and regulatory processes.

The Risk Mitigation and Communication Opportunity Intuitive/Subjective to Quantitative HCCP FMEA Quality by Design “Reliability is a design engineering discipline which applies scientific knowledge to assure a product will perform its intended function for the required duration within a given environment. This includes designing in the ability to maintain, test, and support the product throughout its total life cycle. Reliability is best described as product performance over time.”

The Quality Systems Opportunity A Historical Note on Quality: Milestones in Quality Journey or Lurching from Fad to Fad? Sampling Plans (‘50s) Zero-Defect Movement (‘60s) ISO-9000 (‘80s) QS-9000 Malcolm Baldrige Award European Quality Award Total Quality Management Six Sigma The Ultimate Six Sigma - “The Big Q” cGMPs Pharmaceutical Quality System for the 21st Century K. R. Bhote and A. K. Bhote. World Class Quality (2000) ISBN 0-8144-0427

A Two Year Journey? What is the Destination? “Vision 2020 - I can see clearly now” The “Desired State” http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3804s1_02_hussain.ppt

Desired State Product quality and performance achieved and assured by design of effective and efficient manufacturing processes Product specifications based on mechanistic understanding of how formulation and process factors impact product performance Continuous "real time" assurance of quality

Desired State Regulatory policies tailored to recognize the level of scientific knowledge supporting product applications, process validation, and process capability Risk based regulatory scrutiny relate to the: level of scientific understanding of how formulation and manufacturing process factors affect product quality and performance, and the capability of process control strategies to prevent or mitigate risk of producing a poor quality product

Meeting Objectives Seek input and advise on charting the most efficient path towards the “desired state” Review assessment of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) sections of submissions Risk based cGMP Inspections: Selection of Manufacturing sites for inspections

What do we wish to accomplish with ICH Q8 Ensure Q8 facilitates movement towards the “desired state” we have articulated This will Help us better understand the proposed product and process design and its relation to the intended use improve process of establishing regulatory specifications Improve our ability to identify and understand critical product and process factors improve our understanding and confidence in risk mitigation strategies Allow us to utilize risk based approaches and recognize good science and facilitate continuous improvement Improve communication and systems thinking More efficient review and inspection process Be a “win win win” for public health, regulators and industry

ICH Q8: Integrating QbD and Risk Mitigation Dimensions Illustrative Examples of points to consider Development Objectives Intended Use Route of administration Patient population ….. Product Design Design Specifications (Customer requirements) Manufacturing Process and its Control Regulatory Specs. Risks to Quality Risk of incorrect identity Poor product & process Changes in clinical trial product (Bridging studies) Inadequate Design Specifications (e.g., TDS adhesive attribute) Critical to quality and performance? Risk of unqualified impurities Risk of poor bioavailability Risk of incorrect expiry date Risk of inadequate controls Risks After Approval [Risk of SUPAC,..] [Risk of unrepresentative test samples] [Risk of Inadequate Facility and QS] Tests & Controls -Risk Mitigation ICH Q9

Continuous Improvement – Emerging ICH Q8 “Design Space” Concept Multi-dimensional space defined by critical vectors of product quality and performance Examples of critical vectors Robust manufacturing process – consistent, reproducible delivery of product meeting its specifications Manufacturing options Stability (shelf-life) and Bioavailability

Risk cGMP ICH Q8 regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system Process Understanding Post approval change CMC regulatory oversight ICH Q8&9

Risk (P/R) CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP Process Understanding Risk (P/R) CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP Post approval change ICH Q8 + Q9 PAC to Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP Proposed ICH Q 10

Moving towards the “Desired State” Day 1 Update on Current Efforts ICH Q8, Q9 and proposed Q10 ASTM Awareness topic: Filling the gaps – Research planning Bayesian approaches in CMC? Critical Path Initiative Implementing the concepts developed in ONDC and OGD Manufacturing Science Quality by Design

Moving towards the “Desired State” Day 2 Risk based CGMP Inspections Update on research study on pharmaceutical industry practices Pilot model for prioritizing selection of manufacturing sites for inspections CGMPs for the Production of Phase I INDs Efforts on facilitating continuous improvement through reduction in the need for “Prior Approval Supplements” PAT Example Comparability protocol concept