Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure Legend: From: Human grasp point selection
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: Seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1. doi: /8.4.1.
From: Davida Teller Award Lecture 2013: The importance of prediction and anticipation in the control of smooth pursuit eye movements Journal of Vision.
From: Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space Journal of Vision. 2013;13(2):8.
From: Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(3):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):10. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: A moving-barber-pole illusion
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: The natural statistics of blur
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(9):9. doi: /9.9.9 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
Figure Legend: statistical inference
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
Figure Legend: From: Dynamics of oculomotor direction discrimination
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(5):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):1. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion Journal of Vision.
From: Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):2.
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(10):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Spatial structure of contextual modulation
Figure Legend: From: The absolute threshold of cone vision
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(12):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Objects predict fixations better than early saliency
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: Cause and effect
From: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
Two-Dimensional Substructure of MT Receptive Fields
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Stephen V. David, Benjamin Y. Hayden, James A. Mazer, Jack L. Gallant 
The Normalization Model of Attention
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

From: Voluntary control of long-range motion integration via selective attention to context Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi:10.1167/8.11.18 Figure Legend: Experiment 3 results pooled across observers, for each of the stimulus configurations (a–d). Schematic representations of the display configurations are shown in the leftmost column, with local motion directions indicated by gray diagonals pointing out of each circular grating, and global motion directions expected to be induced by attention to one or other pair of context stimuli indicated by black arrows attached to one or other context axis. Along each row (a–d), radial histograms display the distribution of reported global motion directions for each contrast condition (Equal, Contrast A, or Contrast B). Yellow segments indicate the proportion of responses during cueing to the vertical axis; blue segments are for cueing to the horizontal axis. (e–f) Relative proportions of responses in three directions visualized as stacked bar charts summarizing the relative proportions averaged across subjects. Separate panels show responses during attentional cueing of the high-contrast axis (left half of graph) versus cueing to the low-contrast axis (right half). Red bars indicate the proportion of local motion reports; white middle region above red bar indicates global motion reports in the direction expected to be induced by the currently cued axis; green bars at top of graph indicate the remaining proportion of reports reflecting the global motion induced by the uncued axis (this may be quantified by measuring from the top of the graph). Results for individual observers are superimposed as cumulative proportions, representing the breakdown of the mean proportions shown in the background, now shown as individual data points. Filled red points indicate proportion of local motion reports; open red/white points indicate proportion of cued global motion reports ( plus the local motion proportion indicated by the lower solid points). Distance from the top of graph to the open red/white points thus reflects the remaining proportion of responses in the uncued global direction. Date of download: 1/1/2018 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved.