Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Structural schematic diagram of the three flow paths
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Solving process of the mathematical models: (a) ICDs completed horizontal well model and (b) coupled model of the well and reservoir
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Comparison of the result of the model in this paper and that of the commercial software eclipse
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Comparison of the inflow profile: (a) gravel packing and on packing and (b) uneven packing
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Comparison of axial flow rates and inflow profiles: (a) axial flow rate and (b) inflow profile
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Curves of η: (a) nozzle size, (b) middle part's permeability, and (c) leakage factor
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Schematic plot of the reservoir
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Inflow profiles at different watercut stages: (a) water breakthrough, (b) watercut equals 30%, (c) watercut equals 50%, (d) watercut equals 70%, (e) watercut equals 90%, and (f) watercut equals 96%
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Mathematical Model and Inflow Control Effect Analysis of Inflow Control Devices Completed Horizontal Well J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3):034501-034501-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034759 Figure Legend: Curves of η, watercut, and recovery: (a) η and watercut and (b) watercut and oil recovery