Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some observations on the base of the ASEP dBase Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
Advertisements

Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
CARS 21 A strategic vision towards increased internationalisation in the automotive sector What does it entail for the World Forum for Harmonisation of.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
Applied AcousticsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Wolfgang Kropp Tor Kihlman Jens Forss é n Lars Ivarsson.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
2012/1/13 1 Gear shift analysis ~ Further Review on original JPN gear shift points ~ Prepared by Japan 13 January 2012.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
Study of the effect of AVAS on road traffic noise
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~ JASIC 1 Informal document GRB (57 th GRB, 5-7 February 2013, agenda.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
1 Automotive industry Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles: New EU Commission legislative proposal World Forum on Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) 156.
Influence of road surface on tyre rolling sound emission Report from the NordTyre project, part 2: Passenger car tyres. Truls Berge, SINTEF ICT, Norway.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))
Quiet road surfaces Eurocities - working group noise Chair: Henk Wolfert Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1.
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
Outcome of Meeting on “Environmentally Friendly Vehicle” on Noise Date : 15 th February th Informal Group Meeting on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
1 Situation and new challenges on pass-by noise for road transport vehicles ECE R 51: noise for passenger cars, light commercial and heavy vehicles ( M&
Additional ASEP data GRB IG ASEP sept 2007 By the Netherlands.
Quieter Surface Transport in Urban Areas Project Presentation.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
WLTP-DHC Gear shift analysis Proposed by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden.
Fuel savings potential from low rolling- resistance tires Axel Friedrich Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Germany.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
ETRTO POSITION 41st GRB Meeting Geneva 22/02/2005 GRB- 22/02/05
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Research on M3 sub-categories of R51-03
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Noise problems and driving conditions in China based on ECE R51.03
Off-cycles principles
Electric Motors as Automotive Prime Movers
Driving conditions and conclusions of China on ASEP test method
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Random Cycle Generator
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Continuously Research on ASEP
Electric Motors as Automotive Prime Movers
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
HDV CO2 Regulation in REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Task-force on reverse warning signal CURRENT STATUS in United nations C-WGN 16th – Wuhan – December 11, 2018.
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
Comments on tyre choosing of UN Regulation No
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Presentation transcript:

Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles Automotive Prepared for the GRB-meeting on 21.02.2001 TÜV Süddeutschland Group 1

Noise Emission in different Gears Automotive Examples: Small car (1,2 l, 40 kW, 73 dB(A)), Medium sized car (1,8 l, 110 kW, 71 dB(A)), High performance car (4 l, 210 kW, 70 dB(A)), Diesel car (2,2 l, 92 kW, 71 dB(A)), Old car (1,3 l, 64 kW, 80 dB(A), 1972), Light duty vehicle (2,9 l, 75 kW, 75 dB(A)) TÜV Süddeutschland Group 2

Noise Emission in different Gears Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 3

Noise Emission in different Gears Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 4

Noise Emission in different Gears Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 5

Noise Emission in different Gears Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 6

Noise Emission in different Gears Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 7

Tyre/Road Noise Influence Automotive Average tyre noise influence on overall result: ECE R 51: 35%, Gov-D prop: 45%, OICA prop: 64%, Gov-NL prop: 61% TÜV Süddeutschland Group 8

Questions Which noise source shall be addressed ? Automotive Which noise source shall be addressed ? Mainly Propulsion Noise ? Propulsion and tyre/road noise ? Is it meaningful to include a constant speed test if the result is dominated by tyre/road noise ? Is it meaningful to include tyre/road noise if the manufacturer can choose the test tyre ? Wouldn‘t it be better to reduce the tyre contribution as much as possible ? TÜV Süddeutschland Group 9

Noise Emission in Real Traffic Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 10

Noise Emission in Real Traffic Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 11

Lmax versus Leq Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 12

Conclusions/Remarks ECE R 51 values are poorly correlated with Leq Automotive ECE R 51 values are poorly correlated with Leq Gearshift behaviour is engine speed related rather than vehicle speed related Objective of amendment of ECE R 51 needs to be clarified TÜV Süddeutschland Group 13

Vehicle Speed Distributions Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 14

Target Accelerations Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 15

ECE R 51 OICA, max. Engine Speed Automotive TÜV Süddeutschland Group 16

Questions What type of roads shall be addressed ? Automotive What type of roads shall be addressed ? Residential streets ? Urban main streets ? What vehicle speed range shall be used ? How shall the target acceleration be defined ? What is the limit to avoid suboptimisation of tyres ? TÜV Süddeutschland Group 17

Questions Automotive A partial load test would be representative but would this be suitable to test the quality of silencers ? Is a fixed vehicle speed suitable for the acceleration test since the gearshift behaviour is engine speed related rather than vehicle speed related ? What is the final target ? A quiet vehicle ? Are additional specifications necessary to avoid cycle bypassing ? TÜV Süddeutschland Group 18