Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) Fuel Economy Regulations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JAMA Comments on EU CO 2 strategy at Public Hearing Hiroki Ota Director General JAMA Europe 11 July 2007.
Advertisements

Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards A Global Review Public Hearing: Reducing CO 2 from Passenger Cars and Light Commercial Trucks.
Air Pollution: CAFE Standards and Gas Taxes Mario Samano Department of Economics.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) Standards
Global Comparison of Passenger Car and Light-commercial Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards Update: February 2014.
Just tightening failed CAFE standards will not work out Xiaojiao Chen February 3 rd, 2010.
Takahiko Kiso August 6, 2012 An Evaluation of Footprint-Based Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards.
© 2012 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved. Past the Green Image of Hybrids: Finding commercial value. Craig Jacobs Eaton Corporation June 12 th, 2012.
1 What Would it Take? To Reduce Mobile CO2 Emissions Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the COG Climate Change Steering.
The Need for a Political Roadmap: The Story of American Energy Conservation Policy Since the 1970’s Robert D. Lifset Joe C. and Carole Kerr McClendon Honors.
Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General Agnieszka Kozakiewicz Automotive Industry Unit (F1) Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General European Commission.
Fuel Economy/Consumption Tunisian Case study Center for Environment and Development For The Arab region and Europe.
Greenhouse Gas ASSESSING & MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE RISK BROKERAGE & STRATEGIC SERVICES 1 Key Elements of a Successful Market-Based GHG Offset Program Key.
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle CAFE and GHG Standards Joint Briefing for WP29 June 2010 Informal document No. WP ,
66th ECE Commission Geneva, April 2015 Connectivity and Competitiveness for Sustainable Lives Sustainable Connectivity Includes Safe Mobility Which.
Update: August 2011 Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards.
→ UK policy & targets Kyoto: reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 12.5% below 1990 levels by UK targets: –Reduce carbon dioxide emissions by.
1 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Rulemaking National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Informal Document No. WP th session, June.
Canada’s Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations for Model Years Briefing for WP.29 Steve McCauley Environment.
Options for Carbon Regulation of the European Car Industry Alex Veitch Transport Strategy Manager Energy Saving Trust LowCVP Conference: Policy Challenge.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Voluntary Agreements as Drivers of Technological Change in the Transport Sector Lewis M.
International Civil Aviation Organization Colloquium on Environmental Aspects of Aviation Aircraft Noise - The Way Forward Willard Dodds, Chairman ICCAIA.
OPTIONS FOR STATES IMPLEMENTING CARBON STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS ARKANSAS STAKEHOLDER MEETING MAY 28, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
Light Duty Vehicles and CO 2 The Policy Background Malcolm Fergusson Senior Fellow, IEEP ECCP II Conference CO 2 and Cars Working Group 24 October 2005.
Autos in Econ 331b. Agenda Wednesday: Autos Section: Misc and oil premium Monday: Continue autos and rebound effect Wednesday: Behavioral energy economics.
SIAM Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers 30 th Oct 2014 Status of Fuel Efficiency Regulations & Labelling Program.
Fuel Economy Standards and Risk in the Auto Industry Irene Berry Virginia Tech ASME WISE Intern August 2, 2006 [
Carbon capture and storage - input to EUETS Directive review Penny Tomlinson.
Product Planning, Mix, and Development
Green Investment Scheme in Bulgaria Christo Christov, Energy Institute, Bulgaria Workshop Facilitation Green Investment Scheme: first lessons learnt and.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
Driving Down GHG Emissions, Driving Up Fuel Efficiency: Coordinating a Groundbreaking National Vehicle Policy Kathryn Thomson Counselor to the Secretary.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Demand Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015.
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Chapter 16.
1 “Using Carbon Markets to Encourage the Uptake of Low Carbon Vehicles” Meeting the Low Carbon Challenge The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Third Annual.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Part Five, Issue 12 Motor Vehicles and the Environment.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
It’s Easy to Quantify Changes in GHG Emissions from Cars and Light Trucks – Right? Presented to: SACOG Panel Discussion April 16, 2009 Presented by: Bob.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015 Transportation.
Weathering the Change Action Plan 2 ACT Climate Change Council 8 November 2011.
Large Industrial Emitters Emissions Trading Natural Resources Canada March 14, 2003.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Minor Amendments to the ZEV Regulation Sacramento, California October 24, 2013.
Proposed Amendments to Heavy-Duty On-Board Diagnostic Requirements August 23, 2012 Heavy-Duty OBD.
Towards A Unified North American Automobile GHG Standard Group 6 Elena Mager Riley O’Brien Sid Tetz.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015
03/31/2010 v.20 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 1 Summary of Demand Perspective Hard Truths provided evaluation of baseline.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Gasoline Consumption from Corporate Average Fuel Economy Alternative Fuel Vehicle Incentives Alan Jenn – Postdoctoral Scholar,
National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study Supply & Infrastructure Task Group 1 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
1 Dr. Tao Zhan, Research Division Dr. Leela Rao, Mobile Source Control Division El Monte, California May 18, 2010 Public Workshop on Proposed Revisions.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
03/31/2010 v.20 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 1 Summary of Demand Perspective Hard Truths provided evaluation of baseline.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
McCarthy Tétrault APGQ – Conference 2016
EPA Phase II for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Policy Options The basic climate change policy approaches under consideration for the United States are: 1) Cap and Trade: A market based system where.
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Blunt Rollback of Fuel Economy Standards
Emily Wimberger California Air Resources Board TE3 Conference
Mobile Air-conditioning (MAC):
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Simulated fuel economy benefit
3 billion more middle-class consumers will fuel future demand
Fuel Economy in Macedonia Transfer of know-how
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Automotive Part Cleaners & Degreasers Market to cross $47.5bn by 2024 :
Product Planning, Mix, and Development #1
Presentation transcript:

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) Fuel Economy Regulations

U.S. CAFE & KSA Fuel Economy Background CAFE standard footprint curves were based on the mix of vehicles sold in U.S. KSA consumers demand a different mix of vehicles. CAFE has important flexibilities (e.g., FFV, A/C, off-cycle, etc.) that were not adopted by KSA. KSA provided a 4 year offset which is directionally helpful – but does not cover mix differences and lack of flexibilities.

U.S. CAFE & KSA Fuel Economy Flexibilities / Penalties Flexibility CAFE KSA Credits Carry Forward / Back +5 years, -3 years +5 years, -1 year Early Credits 3 Years (started in 2009 for 2012 program) None Car/Truck Trading Capped Unlimited (8 truck credits = 10 car credits) FFV Credits 1.2 mpg cap (0.5 km/liter) Off-Cycle Credits Start in 2017 MY A/C Credits HEV/PHEV/BEV Benefits Petroleum displacement factor for CAFE Non-compliance penalty Manufacturer trading allowed, financial penalties Non-compliant products cannot be sold if 1 year carry-back doesn’t close gap

KSA Fleet Non-Compliant (even with Four Year delay) U.S. CAFE & KSA Fuel Economy Example Different Mix of the Same Vehicles = Different Fleet Fuel Economy U.S. Fleet Compliant (with Flexibilities) KSA Fleet Non-Compliant (even with Four Year delay) These fleets are made up of the same vehicles (same footprint and fuel economy). The size of bubbles is proportional to sales. The mix and flexibilities have changed making U.S. fleet compliant and KSA fleet non-compliant.

U.S. CAFE & KSA Fuel Economy Summary We will continue to work with KSA to resolve the regulatory impact of market mix differences to ensure a successful program. Recommendation - Modify the U.S. CAFE curves (still to begin in MY 2016) to account for U.S. to Saudi Arabia Market Average Fuel Economy Differences Shift the U.S. 2012-2025 car and truck curves down by 2.9km/l to account for the regional fleet mix and consumer preference differences. The shifted curve would be an offset to existing curve (i.e., operate in the same fashion not requiring any modification to the program structure).

Options That Could Add Longevity to Program Delay in light truck implementation: In the global markets, effective dates for trucks are often started at a later point in time than car standards (e.g., CO2 regulation in the EU is delayed two years for light commercial vehicles). Delay start of the program: Delay implementation of the requirements from the proposed start in MY 2016 until MY 2018. Exclusion of passenger vehicles with 3 seating rows or more: (or a 20% target relief in stringency) for vehicles that offer more mobility. 5-Year Offset: Start the program with the FE target curves from the U.S. program as applied in 2011 (a 5 year curve offset) rather than 2012 (4 year offset). Recognition of U.S. Flexibilities: Recognition for vehicle improvements that; allow flexible fuel operation, improve A/C systems, and/or recognition of technologies that achieve real-world benefit that is not captured on U.S. drive cycles.