Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMO Monitoring & Evaluation System (Measuring our Performance/Success)
Advertisements

Project design, preparation and approval Basel Convention Resource Mobilization Workshop Nairobi, 3 – 7 December 2006 Andreas Arlt Secretariat of the Basel.
The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
2013 Progress Review : progress during 2013 and delivering the Strategy Preliminary conclusions and challenges Steering Committee Meeting Dakar, Senegal.
Main project Calls How to Apply Seminar 29th February 2012 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Progress Reporting Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 25th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
Indicators : Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Bologna, 20 June 2013.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Expressions of Interest for Targeted Analyses.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Northern Periphery & Arctic Programme How To Apply seminar 20th March 2014 North Atlantic House, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Strategic Commissioning
Result orientation: Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Skellefteå, 19 September 2013.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Preparatory Project Application Form Kirsti Mijnhijmer 27 th August 2009 – Inverness, Scotland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
NPP concepts and communications Kirsti Mijnhijmer 21 August 2008 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Quality Objectives Kirsti Mijnhijmer 20th March Copenhagen, Denmark.
Strategic project Call and themes for the Seventh Call How to Apply Seminar 16 th February 2011 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
APPROVED by the Commission 16 th December The structure The Programme Area The Programme Strategy The Priorities Financing and Implementation.
National Info Day 1st call of Interreg DANUBE 9 th October 2015 Prague.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
NPA eMS application Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015 – Copenhagen, Denmark.
2014 – 2015, a busy year 30 th September launch of 1 st Call 16 th December Programme approved by Commission Launch of 2 nd Call 5th January 1st Call.
NPP concepts Kirsti Mijnhijmer 2nd September 2008 – Umeå, Sweden European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Project design – Activities and partnership CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser.
4th Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016, Cork, Ireland.
NPA eMS application – Project Information Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
Project Development seminar Katerina Staneva Kring February 2010 | Prague.
Recommendations on project/action design and structure.
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Introduction - Final activity reporting
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME
The EU context for future funding in Scotland John Bachtler The Future of EU Funding in Scotland European Parliament Seminar Grand Central Hotel, Glasgow,
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Tracking development results at the EIB
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Current programme status
Application Form – Part C
Danube Transnational Programme Marius V. Niculae Project Officer
CENTRAL EUROPE first call for proposals
General overview Ole Damsgaard, Joint Secretariat
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
General overview Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
General overview Ole Damsgaard, Joint Secretariat
General overview Ole Damsgaard, Secretariat
Project intervention logic
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland

Some terminology Result: what is intended to be changed in the programme area Outputs: direct products of the programme, intended to contribute to results. They are mainly developed at project level (products/services). Results orientation: for the 2014-2020 period, the focus is shifting from only measuring outputs (products/services) to measuring the results that they contribute to (change in the programme area).

Intervention logic

Intervention logic at programme level Vision: what does the programme want to achieve Thematic objectives: 4 themes form the basis for the 4 priorities Specific objectives: how the programme plans to meet the vision Results sought: what changes the programme wishes to see, e.g. raised awareness, improved entrepreneurial climate, raised preparedness

Intervention logic at programme level Result indicators: how the changes will be measured Actions supported: examples of interventions to help achieve the results sought, including examples of target groups and partners Output indicators: quantifying the outputs that are developed Performance framework: accountability for outputs, finances

What does it mean for projects? Project result: what change does the project hope to achieve? Qualitative contribution to programme result indicators (neutral/positive) Project objectives: how will the project achieve its chosen result? Project outputs: products/services, i.e. the solutions to meet the chosen objectives and result Quantitative contribution to output indicators

What does it mean for projects? Deliverable: by-product in developing the main outputs Budget and spending target: Contribution to the programme financial targets

Quality Objectives - Purpose Bridge the gap between the project outputs and programme results Indicate the type of projects the programme aims to support; those delivering meaningful change. Form a reference point for evaluating project applications – basis for selection criteria

Quality Objectives Concrete Innovative Focused Relevant Responsible Viable Transnational Strategic Value-for-money

Quality Objectives Concrete Innovative Focused Relevant Responsible Viable Transnational Strategic Value-for-money

Quality Objectives – Innovative & Relevant Innovative: the project output is new or innovative to the partner organisations, the partner countries, or the Programme area. Relevant: Project outputs take into account relevant conditions in each part of the project’s target area. This means that the project outcomes: Demonstrate a high relevance for the development needs and opportunities in the target area. Take into account the current situation for the sector/each part of the target area. Demand-driven: The development of project outputs is based on demonstrable stakeholder demand and include stakeholder involvement (interface)

Quality Objective – Viable Viable: project outputs are supported by appropriate business and dissemination models that allow the project output to become self-sustaining when the project support ends. Marketing plans for the project output to reach identified relevant target groups. Note: branding should focus on project outcomes, not the project. Realistic provision/delivery models. For example, ensuring that that the project output is delivered by organisations with the right competences, and well integrated, etc. Related to the concepts of durability and transferability of outputs

Quality Objective – Transnational Transnational: the design of project outputs clearly draws on the results of transnational cooperation. E.g. transferring models/knowledge/technology from one region to another, partners complementing each others’ competences and resources, combining different regional skill sets, gaining a critical mass, etc.

Result indicators – Programme level Text

Output indicators – Project level Example Priority axis 3

Output indicators – Project level Quantify contribution to the output indicator. This is a target value for the entire project. Note: one product or service delivered in several programme partner countries is still considered as one, please do not double count! Please see the Programme Manual for expected targets on programme level. Be realistic!

Thank you for listening Kirsti Mijnhijmer Email: kirsti.mijnhijmer@interreg-npa.eu www.interreg-npa.eu