MICE Collaboration Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.
Printed by MICE is a Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment running at the Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Chilton UK. Cooled muon beams.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
PHYSTAT 05P. Catastini Bias-Free Estimation in Multicomponent Maximum Likelihood Fits with Component-Dependent Templates Pierluigi Catastini I.N.F.N. -
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Mar 25, 2010.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Dec 17, 2009.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Detector Systems Update MICO March 10, MICE Detector Systems  CKOV u No update  TOF0/1 u Tests with laser injection system progressing. u Tests.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Walaron Diagnostics MICE Collaboration Meeting Berkley 9/2/ Beamline Diagnostics Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow / RAL.
MICE VC March 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 EMR Status o Introduction o News o Detector Design o Simulations o Responsibilities o Plan Jean-Sebastien.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
1 M. Bonesini - CM 25 RAL 5/11/09 PID status report M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Forward TOF Prototyping Ryan Mitchell GlueX Collaboration Meeting November 2005.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Yury Gurchin June 2011 MEASUREMENT OF THE CROSS-SECTION IN DP-ELASTIC SCATTERING AT THE ENERGIES OF 500 AND 880 MEV AT NUCLOTRON.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
MICE PID size &scraping MICE CM16, RAL, Oct V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for R. Sandrstrom and others contributing to this effort Yagmur, Holger,
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
- MICE - The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction: Aims And Concept o Design o Infrastructure: Hall,
MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Calorimeter design & simulations for Stage I Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE PID phone conference
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
TOF Emittance Emittance measurements with the TOFs Mark Rayner 4 December 2008.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Electromagnetic Physics Working Group discussion
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Offline Software A. Dobbs CM43 30th October 2015.
Tracking(1) Kp2 decay-in-flight BG simulation
Luminosity Monitor Status
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Transnational Access to the MICE facility
Presentation transcript:

MICE Collaboration Meeting KL Mariyan Bogomilov MICE Collaboration Meeting 7-10 July 2010, RAL

KL remarks Fully operational since July 2008 Stable work since then – no hardware failure Three “well” defined periods of KL running: Commissioning with cosmic July 2008; Sep2008 – Dec2008; Dec2009 – now. For KL description (hardware components, HV settings, naming convention, cable configuration…) please visit http://mice.iit.edu/mico/manuals/KL-manual-15Dec09.pdf Software: KLMonitor runs online (thanks Vassil) KL offline software in place (not frozen, but developing) KL simulation skeleton exists (but needs work) MICE CM27, July 2010

Sketch of current setup TAG Counters TOF0 TOF1 TOF2 KL TAG Counters KL BEAM 92.4 cm 30 cm 30 cm ~ 735 cm ~ 242 cm ~ 10 cm SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW TAG Counters – 3 scintillator slabs, 10 cm wide each, 2.5 cm thick MICE CM27, July 2010

Runs, Variable and Criteria Runs Feb - May 2010 200 MeV/c pion: 1480 210 MeV/c pion: 1642, 1643, 1644, 1645 230 MeV/c pion: 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652 250 MeV/c pion: 1513, 1514 270 MeV/c pion: 1508, 1509 290 MeV/c pion: 1510, 1511, 1512 300 MeV/c pion: 1478 200 MeV/c electron: 1477, 1487 210 MeV/c electron: 1653, 1654, 1655, 1656, 1657 220 MeV/c electron: 1658, 1659, 1688, 1689, 1690 250 MeV/c electron: 1476, 1488 300 MeV/c electron: 1470 350 MeV/c electron: 1635, 1636, 1637, 1638, 1639, 1640, 1641 390 MeV/c electron: 1625, 1626, 1628, 1629 430 MeV/c electron: 1630, 1632, 1633, 1634 Variable: ADC Product = 2* (ADCleft * ADCright)/(ADCleft + ADCright)‏ Criteria: 1 track in TOF detector hit in TOF2 horizontal slabs 3, 4, 5, 6 and TOF2 vertical slabs 4, 5 => a spot area of 24 x 12 cm2 taken into account selection of particle type by TOF (next page)‏ MICE CM27, July 2010

TOF spectra (typical example)‏ MICE CM27, July 2010

Muons, pions, electrons and KL Muons are “contamination” in “electron” and “pion” run. Pions are “contamination” in “electron” run. Electrons are “contamination” in “pion” run. Problem: we don't know apriori approximate muon, electron and pion momentum at KL entrance from the beam setting in above cases because we don't know their momentum at the target. Solution for muons and pions: estimate momentum by TOF. Then using beam line table we fit estimated momentum in the middle between TOF1 and TOF2 table momenta. No way to calculate electron momenta from TOF. The only solution is to use “theoretical” electron momenta from beam line settings in electron runs. MICE CM27, July 2010

Muon spectra in KL An example of electron run with momentum 250 MeV/c at the target. Estimated muon momentum through beam line tables at KL entrance ~ 165 MeV/c. Fraction of muons reached TAG counters ~ 98%. MICE CM27, July 2010

Energy response to muons Muon dE/dx for Pb (the heaviest ingredient in KL) becomes smaller with momentum increasing. Energy deposit difference fits well with calculated momenta. MICE CM27, July 2010

Electron spectra in KL An example of electrons at 250 MeV/c at the target. Estimated electron momentum through beam line tables at KL entrance ~85 MeV/c. Fraction of showering electrons reached TAG counters ~ 70%. MICE CM27, July 2010

Pion spectra in KL An example of pion with momentum 270 MeV/c at the target. Estimated pion momentum through beam line tables at KL entrance ~195 MeV/c. Fraction of pions reached TAG counters ~ 83%. MICE CM27, July 2010

Energy response to pions MICE CM27, July 2010

Table Data and Results MICE CM27, July 2010

Graphics Results Almost all muons with P ≥ 135 MeV/c at KL entrance will reach EMR. Almost all muons with P ≤ 80 MeV/c at KL entrance will be killed in KL. > 70% of pions with P ≥ 150 MeV/c will reach EMR. Almost all pions with P ≤120 MeV/c at KL entrance will be killed in KL. 50-94% of electrons with 50 ≤ P ≤160 MeV/c will reach EMR. There is a drop in the fraction of pions passing KL for P > 240 MeV/c. The reason is unknown, only known is that there is ~ 2 months difference between data taking MICE CM27, July 2010

Conclusions KL is operational, stable from hardware and electronic point of view Software for reading, processing and analysing data is available Series of pion and electron runs with momenta between 200 MeV/c and 430 MeV/c are explored using data of TOF1-2, KL and TAG counters. Results for electrons confirm BTF data from 2006 test: - 50% of 50 MeV/c ‏ - 94% of 160 MeV/c release some energy in TAG counter. Results for muons - Muons with P≥135 MeV/c at KL entrance will reach EMR. - Muons with P≤80 MeV/c at KL entrance will be killed in KL. Results for pions: - >70% of pions with P≥150 MeV/c will reach EMR. - Pions with P≤120 MeV/c at KL entrance will be killed in KL. Still to come: - PID algorithm - attempt to extract time info from fADC - developing Monte Carlo simulation MICE CM27, July 2010