Kitikmeot Inuit Association

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Advertisements

Proposed Quintette Mine Re-opening February 2011.
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Environmental Assessment in Nova Scotia
Environment Canada Presentation to Nunavut Impact Review Board Regarding Baffinland Mary River Project NIRB Prehearing Conference Pond Inlet and Igloolik,
Carolyn Dunn Environmental Assessment Division Healthy Environments Consumer Safety Branch Health Canada High Lake Mine Pre-Hearing Conference December.
Chris Dandurand, P.Eng Kiewit Infrastructure Group Large Hydro Perspective on the Permitting Process & Environmental Approvals.
Environment Canada’s Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Regarding AREVA Resources Canada Inc.’s Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project NIRB.
Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Baker Lake, NU March 2-14,
NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD Targeting Increased Effectiveness in a Changing Landscape Nunavut Mining Symposium, Iqaluit, April 17, 2012.
Applying First Nations Traditional Knowledge to Reclamation in the Oil and Gas Industry West Moberly First Nations Traditional Knowledge Project Oil and.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.
1 Pre-Hearing Conference November 6-10, 2011 Submissions of BIM on Process Issues.
Mineral Development Advisory Group (MDAG) Hope Bay Project &Doris North Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group (MDAG) Hope Bay Project.
Hope Bay Mining Ltd Doris North Project/ Phase II MDAG Meeting Oct 27, 2010 Cambridge Bay, NU.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
Freshwater Aquatic Organisms and Habitat ( ) Rick Palmer Senior Fisheries Biologist Sharleen Hamm Aquatic Ecologist.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
1 The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009.
KIVALLIQ WILDLIFE BOARD, RANKIN INLET AND CHESTERFIELD HTO NIRB: MELIADINE GOLD PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) TECHNICAL COMMENTS.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Type A Water License Renewal for the Nanisivik Mine Project Fisheries and Oceans.
Assessing Effects on Human Health Meadowbank Gold Project Margaux Brisco Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearings, Baker Lake, Nunavut March 27 to 31,
THE DORIS NORTH WATER LICENSE APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut August 2007.
Nunavut Impact Review Board Presentation of Technical Submission AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project March 2015 Transport Canada.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fish Habitat Management Program Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Doris North Gold Project Cambridge Bay August.
Izok Corridor Project: Kitikmeot Community Visit
Meadowbank Gold Project: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada’s Final Hearing Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board March 27 – 31, 2006.
Atlin/Taku Land Use Planning Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #3 March 6, 2009.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Nwtboardforum.com For reference only. Not a legal document Inuvialuit Settlement Region.
Proposed Amendment to Project Certificate (Condition 32) Meadowbank Private Access Road INAC's Comments to NIRB Baker Lake, Nunavut [ April 28-30, 2009.
Qikiqtani Inuit Association Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting and Pre-Hearing Conference January 16 th and 17 th, 2013.
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY. How has (NLCA) been met? a) whether the project would enhance and protect the existing and future well-being of the residents.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Agnico Eagle Mines Limited – Meliadine Gold Project August 21 – 27, 2014 Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Transport Canada.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
Mineral Development Advisory Group. To represent the interests of Kitikmeot Inuit by protecting and promoting our social, cultural, political, environmental.
Agenda  Opening Remarks - NIRB  NIRB Presentation: NLCA Reconsideration of the Meadowbank Gold Mine Project Certificate  General questions on.
TRTFN - BC Framework Agreement Planning Process Fred Oliemans, ILMB Bryan Evans, TRTFN Presentation to Public Workshop, Atlin, BC June 13, 2008.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Canadian Environmental Legislative David Hunter B.A., LL.B., LL.M. Bennett Jones LLP Presentation to: Fachbereich 1 Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen, Geomatik.
CONSULTATION GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE June 2007.
MEADOWBANK WATER LICENSE RENEWAL NWB 2AM MEA0815 January 14-15, 2015, Community of Baker Lake, NU Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd.
P.O. Box 18 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut X0B 0C0 Telephone: Fax: Kitikmeot Inuit Association Summary of Technical Issues.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Submissions Subcommittee
MADRID – BOSTON PROPOSAL PHASE 2 OF THE HOPE BAY PROJECT
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Meadowbank Water License Renewal
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Cumulative Effects
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Freshwater Environment
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Human Environment
Phase 2 – Technical Meetings
WHALE TAIL PIT Expansion Project
Phase 2 – Technical Meetings
Regional Environmental Health Specialist
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.’s Whale Tail Pit Expansion Project
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

Kitikmeot Inuit Association Presentation on Sabina Gold & Silver Corp.’s Back River Project FEIS Addendum

KIA Mandate “To manage Kitikmeot Inuit Lands and Resources to protect and promote the social, cultural, political, environmental, and economic well-being of the Kitikmeot Inuit.”

Project Location on Inuit Owned Land The Back River Project footprint overlaps 5 Inuit Owned Land Parcels BB-02 BB-13 BB-15 BB-16 BB-27 BB-27 BB-16 BB-15 BB-02 BB-13

Sabina Mineral Claims in the Kitikmeot Region

KIA Participation KIA has participated fully and to maximum capacity throughout the NIRB process KIA and Sabina have a positive working relationship Sabina has been receptive to KIA’s concerns and comments, and engaged KIA on many occasions to discuss and resolve issues

KIA Review Team Jared Ottenhof – KIA Lands and Environment Officer Technical Review Lead John Donihee – Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP KIA Legal Counsel

KIA Specialists Wildlife Zoetica Environmental Research Services Inc. Geotechnical Engineering BGC Engineering Inc. Water Quality Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd. Fish and Fish Habitat Palmer Environmental Consulting Group Inc. Air Quality Pottinger Gaherty Environmental Consultants Ltd. Socio-Economics Shared Value Solutions Ltd. Traditional Knowledge Banci Consulting Ltd.

Information Requests KIA submitted approximately 140 Information Requests for the DEIS review phase, and 67 Information Requests to the NIRB for the FEIS phase 25 Traditional Knowledge issues (mostly editorial in nature) were identified in the FEIS and resolved with outcomes included in the KIA’s final written submission prior to the 2016 FEIS Hearing

Technical Comments & Joint Submissions KIA presented the NIRB with 26 technical comments in the initial FEIS review, and 20 technical comments on the FEIS Addendum KIA and Sabina presented 2 joint submissions on proposed terms and conditions for the project certificate to minimize or eliminate KIA concerns: 3 related to water quality 3 related to geotechnical matters 3 related to fish / fish habitat 7 related to wildlife and caribou

KIA-Proponent Interaction Following the release of the Nunavut Impact Review Board Report on the project, Sabina engaged KIA, making significant efforts to resolve KIA’s technical comments and requests This occurred through continual talk and contact between KIA and Sabina that is well documented by Sabina, and was presented at the pre-hearing conference and earlier in this hearing KIA’s submissions to the Board as part of the review process were the results of this ongoing constructive communication

Resolved Technical Comments

Water Quality TC1: Placement of Monitoring Stations in Near- and Mid-Shore Marine Environment TC2: Baseline Water Quality Data TC3: Freshwater Monitoring Locations TC4: Water Quality Sampling Frequency TC5: Water Quality Monitoring Suite TC6: Data Evaluation and Response Framework TC7: Exclusion of Zooplankton from the AEMP

Water Quality Sabina adequately addressed all of KIA’s recommendations or Requests Fine details and detailed designs related to water quality will be addressed through the improvement of the Aquatic Effects Monitoring Program, and other components of Nunavut Water Board water licensing stage

Fish and Fish Habitat TC8: Clarify Representation of Impacts to Fish Habitat TC9: Mitigation by Design vs. Offsetting TC10: Detail on the Design and Construction, and Conceptual Feasibility of the Fish Mitigation Passage TC11: Baseline for Rascal Stream Memo TC12: Reporting on Timing of Fishway Mitigation Activities TC13: Clarification of Terminology and Characterization of Effects TC14: Monitoring of Proposed Mitigation Measure TC15: Evaluating Success as part of the Monitoring Program TC16: Clarification on the Timing of Satellite Imagery for Bathymetric Maps TC17: Serious Harm to non-Fish Bearing Lakes and Ponds TC18: Losses in Fisheries Productivity

Fish and Fish Habitat Sabina adequately addressed all of KIA’s recommendations or Requests Fine details and detailed designs related to fish and fish habitat will be determined in the Fisheries Act authorization stage

Caribou and Wildlife TC19: Mitigation plan Continuity between WMMP Versions TC20: Caribou Mitigation and Protection

KIA Recommendations KIA would like to reiterate their support for the commitments, terms and conditions that were jointly submitted with Sabina at the 2016 FEIS Hearing

Future KIA Matters Though there have been progressive technical discussions with Sabina, there are several key project components not yet in place Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement Compensation Agreements under the Nunavut Agreement Land Tenure / Lease Agreement Nunavut Water Board Water License Fisheries Act Authorization KIA anticipates ongoing discussions with Sabina on these matters

Concluding Remarks

Koana-Quana-Thank You