(Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 paul drumm; Jan’05; MICE RF Needs MICE RF Power Paul Drumm ISIS Facility Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & MICE.
Advertisements

MICE & nuSTORM V. Blackmore University of Oxford Neutrino Oscillation Workshop September 13 th, /30V. Blackmore: MICE.
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Precision Neutrino Oscillation Measurements & the Neutrino Factory Scoping Study for a Future Accelerator Neutrino Complex – Discussion Meeting Steve Geer,
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
Alain Blondel NUFACT03 Why do we believe that the neutrino fluxes can be determined to at a Neutrino Factory? source: M. Apollonio et al, OSCILLATION.
THE MICE RF SYSTEM J.F.Orrett* A.J.Moss, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory, WA4 4AD, UK Accelerator Science and Technology Centre
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
CHIPP Sept 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 What is MICE  Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment  What is Ionisation Cooling ? Cooling = Reduction of Beam.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
MICE CM - Fermilab, Chicago - (11/06/2006) 1 A (short) history of MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
Alain Blondel Neutrino Factory scenarios I will endeavour to address some principle design issues related to the physics use of high intensity muon beams.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Fast TOF for Muon Cooling Experiments Robert Abrams Muons, inc.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Ken Peach Particle Physics Department Neutrino Factory Overview.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.
Road Map of Future Neutrino Physics A personal view Ken Peach Round Table discussion at the 6 th NuFACT Workshop Osaka, Japan 26 th July – 1 st August.
Highlights of Tuesday’s session Machine aspects Copyright © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
How to extract Neutrino Factory flux from IMD and neutrino elastic scattering? Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Bright muon sources Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab August 29, 2014.
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.
General motivation S. Geer, K. Long Charge: (July collaboration meeting) Neutrinos and our lives (PR motivation) Neutrino oscillation and the role of NuFact.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
CHIPP Aug 2010J.S. GraulichSlide 1 MICE and the Neutrino Factory Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
H. Haseroth Friday, August 31, 2001 MUG Meeting 1 Overview of the CERN Neutrino Factory Machine Studies H. Haseroth for the Neutrino Factory Working Group.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
ICHEP Conference Amsterdam 31st International Conference on High Energy Physics 24  31 July 2002 Gail G. Hanson University of California, Riverside For.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
PPAP Review 09 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Future Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Dave Wark Imperial/RAL PPAP Birmingham July 15 th, 2009.
Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
1May, IPPP- Imperial College, London1 NF activities at IC (part II) m. apollonio.
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations
An introduction to MICE
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
MOMENT Overview Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
Muon Front End Status Chris Rogers,
The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment: Controls and Monitoring
Design of the MANX experiment
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
UCLA High Energy & Astro-Particle (HEAP) Seminar
Future physics at nuSTORM
Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Future neutrino experiments
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Presentation transcript:

(Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment) the MICE experiment (Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment) A Neutrino Factory (NF) is a device conceived to produce a large amount of neutrinos (nm ,ne) in a very clean way, due to the underlying physical process of their generation. These characteristics make the NF a really powerful tool to investigate the ultimate properties of the leptonic sector (q13 mixing angle and the measurement of a leptonic CP violation effect). To reach these goals we need to store ~ 1021 muons/yr. A possible design for a NF foresees to store ~20 GeV muons in a “ring” where they decay along the straight sections (m  nm + ne + e) generating the neutrinos suitable for the physics where the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation is exploited to study the properties of neutrinos with great precision. Since the mechanism of neutrino oscillation is used in the downstream detector the optimal baseline is of the order of few 1000 km. A schematic view of the NF is shown in fig. 1 Muons are tertiary beams and are produced with a high emittance therefore they need to be cooled before acceleration. The cooling must also be fast, given the short lifetime of the muon (t ~2 ms); this fact puts conventional systems (e.g. stochastic cooling) out of the game. Ionization Cooling, instead, appears to be the only practical technique. The principle (illustrated in fig.2) is quite simple: layers of an absorber material and RF sections are alternated. The absorber causes an energy loss by ionization of the charged particle crossing the medium, the RF cavity accelerates the muon in the forward direction. The cooling effect is somewhat spoiled by the multiple scattering always present when going trhough a material. At the proper initial emittance the overall effect is a reduction in the transverse emittance. The mechanism is “well known to work …”, theoretically. The goal of MICE is to prove the feasibility of this principle by building a portion of a cooling channel and measuring its performances MICE will be built at the Rutherford Laboratory (UK) in 6 steps, starting from a very basic configuration to a final layout displayed in the cartoon of fig. 3 and on fig.4. It is an international collaboration involving institutions from UK, Europe, United States, Japan and China. Fig. 1: a possible layout of the Neutrino Factory Fig. 2: principle of muon cooling and theoretical formula with the effects of cooling and multiple scattering Fig. 3: emittance reduction in MICE Optmizing the matching coil currents emittance variation vs initial e BZ along axis (T) b (m) Transmission of the channel downstream SPE (m rad)  low Z absorber material  tight focus (low b function)  H2 is best absorber material MICE steps and phases PHASE I Emittance vs amplitude PHASE II m.apollonio@physics.ox.ac.uk Poster session, CERN accelerator school 2006, Zakopane