Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
ICD Energy Calibration Andy White January 16, 2002.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)1 The CMS Preshower Detector Overview CERN Armenia : Yerevan Physics Institute Belarus : Minsk.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
A Prototype Diamond Detector for the Compton Polarimeter in Jefferson lab, Hall C Medium Energy Physics Group Amrendra.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Lucia Bortko | Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design | | IFJ PAN Krakow | Page 1/16 Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design Lucia.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
DHCAL Jan Blaha R&D is in framework of the CALICE collaboration CLIC08 Workshop CERN, 14 – 17 October 2008.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
A Forward Calorimeter (FoCal) as upgrade for the ALICE experiment at CERN S. Muhuri a, M. Reicher b and T. Tsuji c a Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
or getting rid of the give-away particles in a test-beam environment
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
Beam test of Silicon-Tungsten Calorimeter Prototype
M. Brigida, F. de Palma, C. Favuzzi, P. Fusco, F. Gargano, N
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
“minimum-ionisation” peak
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
BESIII EMC electronics
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG 16 September 2002.
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Single Particle Geant4 simulation for the sPHENIX PRESHOWER
PrimEx p0 radiative width extraction
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina HEP2006 Recent Developments in High Energy Physics and Cosmology Ioannina, Greece, April 13-16, 2006

Talk Overview The Preshower detector in CMS. Preshower calibration (why?) Test Beam Setup Data Analysis Pedestal Subtraction Common Mode correction Single strip signal extraction Total signal extraction GEANT 4 simulation Energy calibration Data over MC Summary Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector in CMS Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector Barrel ECAL Preshower fiducial coverage: 1.653<η<2.6 or 10˚<θ<20˚ Endcap ECAL Preshower The Preshower is a sandwich of two lead plates (absorbers) and two plates of silicon strip sensors. Provides the position of the foot of the shower in the ECAL. Main task is to identify the photons from π0→γ γ and distinguish them from single photons (π0/γ separation). Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector Signal : Higgs decay to two gammas Background : one gamma faked by π0 decay Single γ detection Double γ detection from π0 decay Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector μmodule Ladder 32 strips 6.3 cm 6.3 cm layout of the ladders for one half of an ES plane Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Preshower calibration (Why?) Total Energy Deposition in ECAL: ETotal = ECrystals + EPreshower Preshower should provide EPreshower with an accuracy of ~5%. Signal produced by the sensors depends on: Incident particle type and energy. Angle of incidence (varies with η). Sensor capacitance (vary by ±5% due to variation of thickness 320±15 μm). Charge collection efficiency of the sensors, which decreases with neutron (1.6x1014cm-2) proton(0.4x1014cm-2) fluence. Intrinsic gain of pre-amplifier (PACE3) Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Preshower calibration PACE 3: 32 channel Preamplifier shaper 32x192 analogue memory for event pipelining Silicon Sensor PACE3 hybrid PACE 3 modes of operation: “Calibration mode”: average gain ~ 20 mV /mip “Normal mode”: average gain ~ 3.2 mV /mip (1 mip = 83.7 KeV = 3.7 fC for a 320 μm thick sensor) Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Preshower calibration Muons with momentum ~150 GeV/c are on the most probable energy loss plateau. Energy deposition ~91 KeV for a 320μm thick sensor. Most probable energy loss in silicon, scaled to the mean loss of a minimum ionising particle, 388 eV/μm (1.66 MeV g-1 cm2) (PDG 2004) Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Test Beam Setup CERN H4 experimental hall. Muon data at 150 GeV/c (used for this analysis) Electron data at 20, 35, 50, 80 and 120 GeV/c Pion data at 20, 30, 50, 80 and 120 GeV/c Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

One Plane of the Preshower Prototype Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Pedestal Subtraction Evaluation of pedestal per strip using dedicated pedestal runs. For every channel raw values fitted to a Gaussian distribution. Extraction of central values and sigmas. X sensor: average σ=6.6 ADC counts (2.9 mV) Y sensor: average σ=8.5 ADC counts (3.7 mV) Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Pedestal subtraction Pedestal values and sigmas for all channels of X and Y sensors. Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Common Mode correction Small displacement of base line, differing on an event by event basis, due to external sources of noise. Correction on an event by event basis. Method: Projection of the event on the y axis. Fitting of the peak to a Gaussian distribution. Evaluation of common mode. Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Single strip signal extraction Pedestal region fitted to a Gaussian Distribution (sigma = noise N). Signal region fitted to a Landau distribution convoluted with a Gaussian one (MPE = signal S). X-sensor : S/N≈9 Y sensor : S/N≈7 Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Total signal extraction Total signal (ADC channels) = The sum of all strips after cutting 5σ (pedestal σ) on every strip. Fitting data to a Landau distribution convoluted by a Gaussian: σL : Width parameter of Landau density MPE : Most Probable Energy of Landau density Integral : Normalization constant σG : Width of convoluted Gaussian distribution Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

GEANT 4 simulation For the analysis of the Test Beam Data a Monte Carlo was developed based on Geant 4. Fit MC data on a Landau distribution. Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Energy calibration Combining data and MC results the following absolute energy calibration of our sensors is possible: Simulation DATA (KeV) (ADC counts) Sensor X (MPE) 89.0±0.1 49.0±0.1 Sensor Y (MPE) 89.3±0.1 43.7±0.1 Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Data over MC Electronic noise added in MC in the form of a Gaussian distribution with widths: X sensor: 5.4 ADC counts correspond to 9.8 KeV Y sensor: 5.9 ADC counts correspond to 12.1 keV Data MC without noise MC with noise Data MC without noise MC with noise Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Summary The Muon signal per silicon sensor is extracted, after pedestal subtraction and common mode correction. The absolute calibration of the Preshower sensors is demonstrated. MC in excellent agreement with data. This work: CMS NOTE 2006/046, NIM A in print. Calibration before detector construction. Calibration during construction of the ladders using cosmic muons. Calibration during data taking. An absolute calibration will be performed at regular intervals in-situ in CMS using muons or even pions. Ioannina HEP2006 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina