Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona The heavy ionising particles in CMS tracker Hip effect description. The PSI beam test. Measurements of hip rate and induced dead.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)1 The CMS Preshower Detector Overview CERN Armenia : Yerevan Physics Institute Belarus : Minsk.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
11/18/2016 Test beam studies of the W-Si tracking calorimeter for the PHENIX forward upgrade Y. Kwon, Yonsei Univ., PHENIX.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
A Prototype Diamond Detector for the Compton Polarimeter in Jefferson lab, Hall C Medium Energy Physics Group Amrendra.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
or getting rid of the give-away particles in a test-beam environment
Beam test of Silicon-Tungsten Calorimeter Prototype
FCAL R&D towards a prototype of very compact calorimeter
M. Brigida, F. de Palma, C. Favuzzi, P. Fusco, F. Gargano, N
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
CALICE scintillator HCAL
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
“minimum-ionisation” peak
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
BESIII EMC electronics
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Single Particle Geant4 simulation for the sPHENIX PRESHOWER
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
The Measurement of Forward Particle Production in LHC
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c and absolute energy calibration of a CMS Preshower Prototype Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina On behalf of the CMS ECAL Collaboration IPRD06 10th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors 1-5 October 2006 Siena, Italy

Talk Overview The Preshower detector in CMS. Preshower calibration (why?) Test Beam Setup Muon Data Analysis Pedestal Subtraction Common Mode correction Single strip signal extraction Total signal extraction GEANT 4 simulation Energy calibration Data over MC Electron Analysis Summary Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector in CMS Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector Barrel ECAL Preshower fiducial coverage: 1.653<η<2.6 or 10˚<θ<20˚ Endcap ECAL Preshower The Preshower is a sandwich of two orthogonal layers of silicon strip sensors positioned behind two planes of lead absorbers. Provides the position of the foot of the shower in the endcap ECAL. Main task is to identify the photons from π0→γ γ and distinguish them from single photons (π0/γ separation). Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector Signal : Higgs decay to two gammas Background : one gamma faked by π0 decay Single γ detection Double γ detection from π0 decay Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

The Preshower Detector μmodule Ladder 32 strips 6.3 cm 6.3 cm layout of the ladders for one half of an ES plane Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Preshower calibration (Why?) Total Energy Deposition in ECAL: ETotal = ECrystals + EPreshower Preshower should provide EPreshower with an accuracy of ~5%. Signal produced by the sensors depends on: Incident particle type and energy. Angle of incidence (varies with η). Sensor capacitance (vary by ±5% due to variation of thickness 320±15 μm). Charge collection efficiency of the sensors, which decreases with neutron - proton fluence (10 y for High Luminosity ~1.6x1014cm-2 neutrons and ~0.4x1014cm-2 protons for large η). Intrinsic gain of pre-amplifier (PACE3). Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Preshower calibration PACE 3: 32 channel Preamplifier shaper 32x192 analogue memory for event pipelining Silicon Sensor PACE3 hybrid PACE 3 modes of operation: “Calibration mode”: average gain ~ 20 mV /mip “Normal mode”: average gain ~ 3.2 mV /mip (1 mip = 83.7 KeV = 3.7 fC for a 320 μm thick sensor) Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Test Beam Setup CERN H4 experimental hall. Muon data at 150 GeV/c Electron data at 20, 35, 50, 80 and 120 GeV/c Pion data at 20, 30, 50, 80 and 120 GeV/c Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

One Plane of the Preshower Prototype Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Pedestal Subtraction Use of dedicated pedestal runs. Pedestal evaluation per strip. For every channel raw values fitted to a Gaussian distribution. Extraction of central values and sigmas. Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Common Mode correction Small displacement of base line, differing on an event by event basis, due to external sources of noise. Correction on an event by event basis. Method: Projection of the event on the y axis. Fitting of the peak to a Gaussian distribution. Evaluation of common mode. Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Single strip signal extraction Pedestal region fitted to a Gaussian Distribution (sigma = noise N). Signal region fitted to a Landau distribution convoluted with a Gaussian one (MPE = signal S). X sensor : S/N≈9 Y sensor : S/N≈7 Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Total signal extraction Total signal (ADC counts) = The sum of all strips after cutting 5σ (pedestal σ) on every strip. Fitting data to a Landau distribution convoluted by a Gaussian: σL : Width parameter of Landau density MPE : Most Probable Energy of Landau density Integral : Normalization constant σG : Width of convoluted Gaussian distribution Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

GEANT 4 simulation For the analysis of the Test Beam Data a Monte Carlo was developed based on Geant 4. Fit MC data on a Landau distribution. Simulation DATA (keV) (ADC counts) Sensor X (MPE) 89.0±0.1 49.0±0.1 Sensor Y (MPE) 89.3±0.1 43.7±0.1 Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Data over MC Electronic noise added in MC in the form of a Gaussian distribution with widths: X sensor: 5.4 ADC counts correspond to 9.8 keV Y sensor: 5.9 ADC counts correspond to 12.1 keV Data MC without noise MC with noise Data MC without noise MC with noise Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Electron Detection Analysis of electron Data. Pedestal Subtraction. Common Mode correction. Total signal (ADC counts) = The sum of all strips after cutting 5σ (pedestal σ) on every strip. Use Absolute Energy Calibration (muons). Going from “calibration” to “normal” mode. Plot electron Energy Deposition in X and Y sensor. Preliminary Preliminary Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Electron Detection Electrons Mean Energy Deposition per sensor and for the various momentum. Red points Monte Carlo. Preliminary Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Summary The Muon signal per silicon sensor is extracted, after pedestal subtraction and common mode correction. The absolute calibration of the Preshower sensors is demonstrated. MC in excellent agreement with data. Electron – pion analysis in progress. Calibration before detector construction. Calibration during construction of the ladders using cosmic muons. Calibration during data taking. An absolute calibration will be performed at regular intervals in-situ in CMS using muons or even pions. Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Spare Transparencies Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Preshower calibration Muons with momentum ~150 GeV/c are on the most probable energy loss plateau. Energy deposition ~91 KeV for a 320μm thick sensor. Most probable energy loss in silicon, scaled to the mean loss of a minimum ionising particle, 388 eV/μm (1.66 MeV g-1 cm2) (PDG 2004) Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

Calibration using cosmic muons μ Stack of 6 ladders. Two scintillators for triggering. Trigger rate ~1Hz. ~1 week data taking. One year operation for 536 ladders (4300 μmodules). Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina

In-situ Absolute Calibration Using muon or jet events. Use tracker/muon system to predict ES strips that have been traversed. ES plane #2, (Y-plane) X Y strip orientation Z ΔΧ ΔΥ vertex ES plane #1, (X-plane) Single track <2 weeks needed for calibration at low luminosity Siena IPRD06 Panagiotis Kokkas, Univ. of Ioannina