Proving Causation Why do you think it was me?!.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Section 4.2. Correlation and Regression Describe only linear relationship. Strongly influenced by extremes in data. Always plot data first. Extrapolation.
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Aim: How do we establish causation?
AP Statistics Section 4.3 Establishing Causation
Correlation AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
MA 102 Statistical Controversies Friday, March 22, 2002 Today: Chapter 15 More on Correlation Regression Causation Reading : None new Exercises: 15.1,
Lesson Establishing Causation. Knowledge Objectives Identify the three ways in which the association between two variables can be explained. Define.
AP STATS: 50 point quiz Sit with your partner. This is open notes/textbook. Work for 20 minutes with your partner on the quiz. Each person will have to.
 Pg : 3b, 6b (form and strength)  Page : 10b, 12a, 16c, 16e.
Chapter 4 Section 3 Establishing Causation
The Question of Causation
1 10. Causality and Correlation ECON 251 Research Methods.
 Correlation and regression are closely connected; however correlation does not require you to choose an explanatory variable and regression does. 
Looking at data: relationships - Caution about correlation and regression - The question of causation IPS chapters 2.4 and 2.5 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and.
Lecture PowerPoint Slides Basic Practice of Statistics 7 th Edition.
Topic 10 - Linear Regression Least squares principle - pages 301 – – 309 Hypothesis tests/confidence intervals/prediction intervals for regression.
Does Association Imply Causation? Sometimes, but not always! What about: –x=mother's BMI, y=daughter's BMI –x=amt. of saccharin in a rat's diet, y=# of.
Warm-Up.
+ Chapter 4 Designing Studies 4.1Samples and Surveys 4.2Experiments 4.3Using Studies Wisely.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
Get out your Residuals Worksheet! You will be able to distinguish between correlation and causation. Today’s Objectives:
AP STATISTICS LESSON 4 – 2 ( DAY 1 ) Cautions About Correlation and Regression.
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
Lecture 5 Chapter 4. Relationships: Regression Student version.
Describing Relationships
Cautions About Correlation and Regression Section 4.2.
+ Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3b Using Studies Wisely.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
Prediction and Causation How do we predict a response? Explanatory Variables can be used to predict a response: 1. Prediction is based on fitting a line.
Section 3.3 Day 3.
2.7 The Question of Causation
Cautions About Correlation and Regression Section 4.2
Chapter 4.2 Notes LSRL.
Cautions About Correlation and Regression
Establishing Causation
4.3: Using Studies Wisely.
Section 4.3 Types of Association
Chapter 2 Looking at Data— Relationships
Register for AP Exams --- now there’s a $10 late fee per exam
How can we identify a novel carcinogen?
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Cautions about Correlation and Regression
The Question of Causation
Looking at data: relationships - Caution about correlation and regression - The question of causation IPS chapters 2.4 and 2.5 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and.
Lesson Using Studies Wisely.
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Does Association Imply Causation?
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
29.) A. Overall, 11.88% of white defendants and 10.24% of black defendants receive the death penalty. For white victims, 12.58% of white defendants and.
4.2 Cautions about Correlation and Regression
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Section 6.2 Establishing Causation
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
AVOID the word “causes” in
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: More on Two-Variable Data
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Presentation transcript:

Proving Causation Why do you think it was me?!

Causation A “correlation” between two variables does not immediately mean that one variable “causes” the other. The relationship is often influenced by other variables “lurking” in the background.

How to see causation?? The best evidence for causation comes from randomized comparative experiments. Why? The relationship may be due to direct causation, common response, or confounding.

Direct Causation There is a strong correlation between smoking cigarettes and death from lung cancer. Does smoking cigarettes cause lung cancer? There is a strong correlation between the availability of hand guns in America and the homicide rate. Is the availability of hand guns the cause of the homicide rate?

Does watching TV make you live longer? This is called a “nonsense” correlation. People with TV’s are also in more developed countries, have better health care, etc.

Common Response If “watching too much television” is the explanatory variable and “obesity in children” is the response variable, a possible lurking variable can be “poor food choices”. Did poor food choices cause obesity in children? Did poor food choices make children watch too much television (junk food in front of TV)?

Confounding You just don’t know if it was the explanatory variable or the lurking variable which caused the response variable. There is an association between variables, but you don’t know if there is a cause and effect relationship.

How they look… The arrows represent a cause-and-effect link. The dashed lines represent an association. X = Explanatory, Y = Response, Z = Lurking

If an experiment is not possible… The association is strong. The association is consistent. Higher doses are associated with stronger responses. The alleged cause precedes the effect in time. The alleged cause is plausible. You need to make sure you can prove the following to establish causation when you cannot perform an experiment:

Now for you and your groups… Create 5 confounding diagrams (of each type) related to different topics. Make sure you use different variables (especially different lurking variables, each time).