LIGO/Caltech and University of Western Australia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis Ugolini, Trinity University Bite of Science Session, TEP 2014 February 13, 2014 Catching the Gravitational Waves.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advanced Gravitational-wave Detectors and LIGO-India
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Status of the LIGO Project
2/9/2006Welcome to LIGO1 Welcome to LIGO!. 2/9/2006Welcome to LIGO2 LIGO: A detector that measures very tiny displacements How tiny?
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Listening to Gravitational Waves: Einstein’s Songlines from the Universe Barry C. Barish.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage – Scientist LIGO Hanford Observatory.
What are Gravity Waves?. According to Einstein's theory of gravity, an accelerating mass causes the fabric of space-time to ripple like a pond disturbed.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
David Shoemaker 30 August 05
LIGO-G v1 The LIGO Vacuum System and plans for LIGO-Australia Stan Whitcomb IndIGO - ACIGA meeting on LIGO-Australia 9 February 2011.
1 G Mike Smith Gravitational Waves & Precision Measurements.
Advanced LIGO: our future in gravitational astronomy K.A. Strain for the LIGO Science Collaboration NAM 2008 LIGO-G K.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
Gravitational Wave Arezu Dehghafnar Physics Department SUT.
LIGO-G Black holes, Einstein, and space-time ripples Peter R. Saulson Syracuse University.
LIGO G M Introduction to LIGO Stan Whitcomb LIGO Hanford Observatory 24 August 2004.
14 July LNGSSearch for Gravitational Waves with Interferometers 1 The search for gravitational waves with the new generation of interferometers Peter.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO-G v1 Building a Global Gravitational Wave Telescope Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech and University of Western Australia UC Santa Cruz 19 May 2011.
The Big Bang Observer: High Laser Power for Gravitational- wave Astrophysics Gregory Harry, Peter Fritschel LIGO Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
LIGO-G D Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech National.
LIGO-G D LIGO Laboratory1 Stoyan Nikolov LIGO-G D The LIGO project’s quest for gravitational waves Presenting LIGO to the students of.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
LIGO-G R LIGO, on the threshold of Gravitational Wave Astronomy Stan Whitcomb (for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) Seminar at Notre Dame University.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
The importance of Coatings for Interferometric Gravitational Wave Observatories Riccardo DeSalvo for the Coating group
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
The Status of Advanced LIGO: Light at the end of the Tunnels Jeffrey S. Kissel, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April APS Meeting, Savannah, GA April.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
LIGO-G D LIGO: on the threshold of first observations Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration UBC Physics Colloquium 27 March 2003.
Gravitational Waves What are they? How can they be detected?
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Status of Interferometers and Data Analysis
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Gravity -- Studying the Fabric of the Universe Barry C
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
Update on Status of LIGO
Detection of Gravitational Waves with Interferometers
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
The Next Generation: Advanced LIGO
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Presentation transcript:

LIGO/Caltech and University of Western Australia Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech and University of Western Australia IQEC-CLEO, Sydney 30 August 2011

Gravitational Wave Physics Einstein (in 1916) recognized gravitational waves in his theory of General Relativity Necessary consequence of Special Relativity with its finite speed for information transfer Most distinctive departure from Newtonian theory Time-dependent distortions of space-time created by the acceleration of masses Propagate away from the sources at the speed of light Pure transverse waves Two orthogonal polarizations 21st Congress of the ICO

Evidence for Gravitational Waves: Binary Pulsar PSR1913+16 · 17 / sec · ~ 8 hr Discovered by Hulse and Taylor in 1975 Unprecedented laboratory for studying gravity Extremely stable spin rate Possible to repeat classical tests of relativity (bending of “starlight”, advance of “perihelion”, etc. After correcting for all known relativistic effects, observe loss of orbital energy => Emission of GWs 21st Congress of the ICO

Astrophysical Sources for Terrestrial GW Detectors Compact binary inspiral: “chirps” NS-NS, NS-BH, BH-BH Supernovas or long GRBs: “bursts” GW signals observed in coincidence with EM or neutrino detectors Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic waves” Rapidly rotating neutron stars Modes of NS vibration Cosmological: “stochastic background” Probe back to the Planck time (10-43 s) IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Detecting GWs with Interferometry Suspended mirrors act as “freely-falling” test masses in horizontal plane for frequencies f >> fpend Terrestrial detector, L ~ 4 km For h ~ 10–22 – 10–21 (Initial LIGO) DL ~ 10-18 m Useful bandwidth 10 Hz to 10 kHz, determined by “unavoidable” noise (at low frequencies) and expected maximum source frequencies (high frequencies) IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO Optical Configuration Michelson Interferometer Light is “recycled” about 50 times Power Recycled end test mass beam splitter signal with Fabry-Perot Arm Cavities Light bounces back and forth along arms about 100 times input test mass Laser IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Initial LIGO Sensitivity Goal Strain sensitivity <3x10-23 1/Hz1/2 at 200 Hz Sensing Noise Photon Shot Noise Residual Gas Displacement Noise Seismic motion Thermal Noise Radiation Pressure IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO Sensitivity IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

What’s next for LIGO? Advanced LIGO Take advantage of new technologies and on-going R&D Active anti-seismic system operating to lower frequencies Lower thermal noise suspensions and optics Higher laser power More sensitive and more flexible optical configuration x10 better amplitude sensitivity  x1000 rate=(reach)3  1 day of Advanced LIGO » 1 year of Initial LIGO ! IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Advanced LIGO: Big Picture Advanced LIGO design begins ~1999, just about finished Construction project started April 2008, completes in 2015 Enthusiastically supported by the National Science Foundation Costs: $205 million from the NSF, plus contributions from UK, Germany, Australia Complete replacement of detectors at Livingston and Hanford Improved technology for increased sensitivity IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Advanced LIGO Performance Newtonian background, estimate for LIGO sites Seismic ‘cutoff’ at 10 Hz Suspension thermal noise Test mass thermal noise Quantum noise dominates at most frequencies 10-21 Initial LIGO 10-22 Strain 10-23 Advanced LIGO 10-24 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Stabilization cavities Initial LIGO Laser Stabilization cavities for frequency and beam shape Custom-built 10 W Nd:YAG Laser IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Advanced LIGO Laser Designed and contributed by Albert Einstein Institute Higher power 10W -> 180W Better stability 10x improvement in intensity and frequency stability IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Initial LIGO Mirrors Substrates: SiO2 Polishing Coating 25 cm Diameter, 10 cm thick Homogeneity < 5 x 10-7 Internal mode Q’s > 2 x 106 Polishing Surface uniformity < 1 nm rms (l / 1000) Radii of curvature matched < 3% Coating Scatter < 50 ppm Absorption < 2 ppm Uniformity <10-3 Production involved 5 companies, CSIRO, NIST, and LIGO IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Advanced LIGO Mirrors Larger size Smaller figure error 11 kg -> 40 kg Smaller figure error 0.7 nm -> 0.35 nm Lower absorption 2 ppm -> 0.5 ppm Lower coating thermal noise All substrates delivered Polishing underway Reflective Coating process starting up IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Initial LIGO Vibration Isolation HAM chamber BSC chamber 102 100 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 10-10 Horizontal Vertical IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Advanced LIGO Seismic Isolation Two-stage six-degree-of-freedom active isolation Low noise sensors, Low noise actuators Digital control system to blend outputs of multiple sensors, tailor loop for maximum performance Low frequency cut-off: 40 Hz -> 10 Hz IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Initial LIGO Test Mass Suspension Simple single-loop pendulum suspension Low loss steel wire Adequate thermal noise performance, but little margin Magnetic actuators for control IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Advanced LIGO Suspensions UK designed and contributed test mass suspensions Silicate bonds create quasi-monolithic pendulums using ultra-low loss fused silica fibers to suspend interferometer optics Pendulum Q ~105 -> ~108 Electrostatic actuators for alignment and length control 40 kg silica test mass four stages IQEC-CLEO, Sydney 20

Install and Integration sequence Oct 2010 Jul 2013 Install PSL/IO table Install IMC Install Rec’ld vertex MICH Full interferometer L1 10 months Install Single arm cavity PSL/IO table IMC Install Rec’ld vertex MICH Full interferometer H2 Squeezer install Squeezing Test Install PSL/IO table Install IMC Install Rec’ld vertex MICH H1 (non-project, risk reduction) H1 follows L1 sequence

Beyond Advanced LIGO Future detectors will require much further development Squeezed light, entanglement, macroscopic quantum mechanical techniques Unconventional optics: gratings, cryogenic optics, new shapes New materials for substrates and coatings New interferometer configurations Lasers: higher power, greater stability, new wavelengths IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Using GWs to Learn about the Sources: an Example Chirp Signal binary inspiral Requires source location and complete polarization measurement Can determine Distance from the earth r Masses of the two bodies Orbital eccentricity e and orbital inclination i IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

A Global Network of GW Detectors 2009 GEO Virgo LIGO TAMA Detection confidence Locate sources Decompose the polarization of gravitational waves 1 2 q DL = c dt IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO and Virgo Alone Northern hemisphere detectors have limited ability to locate sources particularly near the celestial equator IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Completing the Global Network GEO Virgo LIGO TAMA Southern Hemisphere detector LIGO-Australia IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO and Virgo Plus LIGO-Australia Adding LIGO-Australia to existing network gives nearly all-sky coverage IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO and Virgo Alone Northern hemisphere detectors have limited ability to locate sources particularly near the celestial equator IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO and Virgo Plus LIGO-Australia Adding LIGO-Australia to existing network gives nearly all-sky coverage IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Large Cryogenic Gravitational-wave Telescope IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Is Importance of LIGO-Australia Reduced Because of LCGT? Improvement in localization is ~independent of LCGT To first order, LIGO-Australia improves N-S localization, while LCGT improved E-W localization LIGO, Virgo, Australia and Japan Fraction of sky LIGO, Virgo, Australia or Japan LIGO, Virgo only Sq. deg IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO-Australia Concept A direct partnership between LIGO Laboratory and Australian collaborators to build an Australian interferometer LIGO Lab (with its UK, German and Australian partners) provides components for one Advanced LIGO interferometer, unit #3, from the Advanced LIGO project Australia provides the infrastructure (site, roads, building, vacuum system), “shipping & handling,” staff, installation & commissioning, operating costs The interferometer, the third Advanced LIGO instrument, would be operated as part of LIGO to maximize the scientific impact of LIGO-Australia Key deadline: LIGO needs a commitment from Australia by October 2011—otherwise, LIGO must pursue other options (e.g., installation at US site) IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

LIGO-Australia Site Australian Consortium for Interferometric Gravitational Astronomy (Australian National University, University of Western Australia, University of Adelaide, University of Melbourne, Monash University) 80 m facility located at Gingin (about 100 km from Perth) Operated as a high power test bed for LIGO Site expandable to 4 km Site also contains 1m robotic optical telescope and an award- winning science education centre IQEC-CLEO, Sydney

Final Thoughts We are on the threshold of a new era in GW detection First generation detectors have broken new ground in optical sensitivity Initial LIGO reached design sensitivity and proved technique Second generation detectors are starting installation Will expand the “Science” (astrophysics) by factor of 1000 Will continue to drive developments in optical technology and optical physics for decades to come A worldwide network is starting to come on line Groundwork has been laid for operation as a integrated system Australia could play a key role IQEC-CLEO, Sydney