Kalin Siow,1,2 Donald T.H. Tan1,2,3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT’S NEW IN EYE CARE? Richard Madonna, OD Kirk Smick, OD Jack Schaeffer, OD Andrea Thau, OD Mark Dunbar, OD Peter G. Shaw-McMinn, OD Moderator.
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Cortical Organization
Chapter 6 Spatial Vision. The visual system recognizes objects from patterns of light and dark. We will focus on the mechanisms the visual system uses.
21st Century Amblyopia: The Next Decade Ben Thompson Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland.
BACKGROUND Lesion Characteristics Related to Naming Improvement in Aphasic Stroke Patients: The Role of Anterior Cortex and the Basal Ganglia R.B. Parkinson.
Bridget C. Hendricks, James Comerford, Frank Thorn, and Eli Peli The New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA Contrast Matching With Complex and Natural.
Adult Cortical Plasticity 1.Maps in somatic sensory and motor cortex 2.Reorganization of cortical maps following sensory deprivation 3.Synaptic basis of.
Refractive Effects of Lamellar Keratectomy/Debridement for Corneal Surface Disorders Pre-Cataract Surgery Haresh Ailani MD, 1 Ira J. Udell MD, 1 Jules.
M.Sc. CNS Visual Perception Concept of receptive field Stan Gielen Dept. of Biophysics.
Laurent Itti: CS599 – Computational Architectures in Biological Vision, USC Lecture 5: Introduction to Vision 2 1 Computational Architectures in.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Playing Piano in the Mind – An fMRI study on music imagery and performance in pianists I.G. Meister, T. Krings, H. Foltys, B. Boroojerdi, M. Muller, R.
Treatment Results Cont’d Presbyopia Group Mean near UAVA improvement was 1.6 near ETDRS lines from 0.33 to 0.17.
A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis Laurent Itti, Christof Koch, and Ernst Niebur IEEE PAMI, 1998.
Asia Arvo 2007, 508 (322) B149 Cortical enhancement of Habitual VA of subjects using Neural Vision Correction Technology Methods A total of 43 subjects.
Background Aniesekonia may limit the effectiveness of conventional optical correction in prevention/treatment of amblyopia. Co-existent medical conditions.
Frank E. Musiek, Ph.D., Jennifer Shinn, M.S., and Christine Hare, M. A.
Pilot Study To Evaluate The Efficacy of Neural Vision Correction™ (NVC™) Technology For Vision Improvement in Low Myopia Donald Tan 1,2,3, Bill Chan 1,
Chapter 3: Neural Processing and Perception. Neural Processing and Perception Neural processing is the interaction of signals in many neurons.
. Introduction NeuroVision™ NVC vision correction technology is a non-invasive, patient-specific treatment based on visual stimulation and facilitation.
Enhancement of Under Corrected Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Myopic Children Using NeuroVision’s Neural Vision Correction (NVC) Technology.
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Treatment Results Cont’d Mean UAVA improvement was 2.8 ETDRS lines (from 0.42 to 0.15) (Fig. 6). Study group improved.
Chapter 4: Cortical Organization
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
Psychology 4051 Amblyopia.
Mind, Brain & Behavior Monday February 10, Sensory Systems  Sensory modalities: Vision, hearing, touch, taste, smell  Submodalities – building.
BIOPHYSICS 6702 – ENCODING NEURAL INFORMATION
Undetected Visual Anomalies in Adult Literacy
Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0
From: Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space Journal of Vision. 2013;13(2):8.
ORTH 140 NORMAL BINOCULAR SINGLE VISION AND MOTOR FUSION
A Bayesian account of context-induced orientation illusions
Pilot Study To Evaluate The Efficacy of Neural Vision Correction™ (NVC™) Technology For Vision Improvement in Low Myopia Donald Tan 1,2,3, Bill Chan 1,
Improving VA and CSF in Subjects with Low Degrees of Myopia and Early Presbyopia using Neural Vision Correction (NVC) Technology Donald Tan 1,2,3 Singapore.
The Alternative Approach to Visual Blur: NeuroVision Treatment (NVC) for Myopia, Post-Refractive Surgery and Presbyopia Donald Tan 1,2,3 Chua Wei Han1,2,
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;53(12): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
Perceptual Development
Early Processing in Biological Vision
Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing
Optic Nerve Projections
STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES
Perception: Structures
Mind, Brain & Behavior Wednesday February 12, 2003.
Spatial Frequency Maps in Cat Visual Cortex
Vision: In the Brain of the Beholder
The unsolved mystery of vision
Orientation tuning: strongest response to one orientation
The authors have no financial interest to disclosure
Saccades actively maintain perceptual continuity
Spike Timing-Dependent LTP/LTD Mediates Visual Experience-Dependent Plasticity in a Developing Retinotectal System  Yangling Mu, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Wavefront Correction of high refractive errors
Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
David T. Vroman, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Beth L. Parkin, Hamed Ekhtiari, Vincent F. Walsh  Neuron 
Neural Network Models in Vision
Lasik decentration with the VISX ActiveTrak™ System
Outline Announcements Human Visual Information Processing
Outline Human Visual Information Processing – cont.
Jenni Deveau, Daniel J. Ozer, Aaron R. Seitz  Current Biology 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
University of California, San Diego Shiley Eye Center
Pairing-Induced Changes of Orientation Maps in Cat Visual Cortex
Lark Kwon Choi, Alan Conrad Bovik
Presentation transcript:

Kalin Siow,1,2 Donald T.H. Tan1,2,3 2 Years Follow-Up Results of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Enhancement in Patients with Low Myopia using NeuroVision’s Neural Vision Correction (NVC) Technology Singapore National Eye Centre Singapore Eye Research Institute Kalin Siow,1,2 Donald T.H. Tan1,2,3 1Singapore National Eye Centre, 2Singapore Eye Research Institute, 3Dept. of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore . Introduction NeuroVision™ NVC vision correction technology is a non-invasive, patient-specific treatment based on visual stimulation and facilitation of neural connections responsible for vision. The technology involves the use of an internet-based computer generated visual training exercise regime using sets of patient specific stimuli based on Gabor patches, to sharpen contrast sensitivity and visual acuity. We reviewed 122 patients (244 eyes) of low myopia on NVC technology in enhancing the unaided visual acuity (UAVA) and unaided contrast sensitivity function (UACSF) in low myopic patients with -1.50 D sphere and below and cylinder -0.75D or less. We also monitored the persistence follow-up to 24 months. Scientific background Cortical neurons in the visual cortex function as highly specialized image analyzers or filters, responding only to specific parameters of a visual image, such as orientation and spatial frequency, and visual processing involves the integrated activity of many neurons, with inter-neural interactions effecting both excitation and inhibition1. Visual contrast activates neurons involved in vision processing, and neural interactions determine the sensitivity for visual contrast at each spatial frequency, and the combination of neural activities set Contrast Sensitivity Function (CSF)1,2. Studies have shown that the noise of individual neurons can be brought under control by appropriate choice of stimulus conditions, and CSF can be increased dramatically through control of stimulus parameters4-8 This precise control of stimulus conditions leading to increased neuronal efficiency is fundamental in initiating the neural modifications that are the basis for brain plasticity9,10. Brain plasticity (the ability to adapt to changed conditions in acquiring new skills) has been demonstrated in many basic tasks, with evidence pointing to physical modifications in the adult cortex during repetitive performance11-12. NeuroVision’s technology probes specific neuronal interactions, using a set of patient-specific stimuli that improve neuronal efficiency6,13 and induce improvement of CSF due to a reduction of noise and increase in signal strength. As visual perception quality depends both on the input received through the eye and the visual cortex processing, NeuroVision’s technology compensates for blurred (myopic) inputs, coming from the retina, by enhancing neural processing. It does not reduce myopia. Purpose NeuroVision’s NVC technology is a non-invasive, patient-specific, perceptual learning program based on visual stimulation and facilitation of neural connections at the cortical level, involving a computerized visual training regime using Gabor patches, to improve contrast sensitivity and visual acuity. We report the treatment in enhancement of unaided visual acuity (UAVA) and unaided contrast sensitivity function (UACSF) in low myopes and monitored the persistence of the improvement for up to 24 months. Methods 244 eyes of low myopes (range 0D to -2.63D with spherical equivalent) underwent NVC treatment in Singapore National Eye Centre. 136 eyes completed 6 months follow-up, 54 eyes completed 12 months follow-up and 36 eyes completed 24 months follow-up post treatment end. Results Mean Baseline LogMAR UAVA was 0.40 improving to 0.107 at the end of the treatment, approximating 3 lines of improvement in acuity. 78% of this improvement was maintained after 6 months, 76% was maintained after 12 months and 74% was maintained after 24 months. Mean baseline UCSF at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd was: 39, 41, 23, 7, 2 improving to: 117, 145, 148, 61, 18. Average 82% of this improvement was maintained after 6 months, 79% was maintained for 12 months and 75% was maintained for 24 months. Mean refractive error in all groups remained unchanged. NeuroVision Data Center Internet Network NeuroVision Treatment Station located at clinic or at home Table 1. Summary of no. of lines of LogMAR improvement, Percentage and no. of eyes treated Unaided VA improvement (LogMAR ± SD) Percentage of the improvement maintained Number of eyes Immediate post-treatment 0.292 ± 0.13 N/A 244 6 month Follow up (compared to immediate post-treatment) 0.235 ± 0.12 78% 136 12 month Follow up (compared to immediate post-treatment) 0.236 ± 0.14 76% 54 24 month Follow up (compared to immediate post-treatment) 0.204 ± 0.12 74% 36 Figure 1. Improvement of Immediate post treatment on unaided Contrast Sensitivity Functions Conclusions: Results suggest that NVC treatment improves UAVA and UCSF in low myopes. This improvement appears to be retained for 24 months after treatment Figure 2. Unaided Contrast Sensitivity Function is retained for 24 months after treatment Graph 1. Unaided VA is retained for 24 months after treatment 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 Baseline PTE 6mth FU 12mth FU 24mth FU Time Unaided VA (logMar) 2 40 eyes 1 30 54 eyes 34 eyes 44 36 36 eyes References