Criticisms of the Ontological Argument

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ontological Argument
Advertisements

God A Priori Arguments. Classical Theism Classical conception of God: God is Classical conception of God: God is Omnipotent Omnipotent Omnipresent Omnipresent.
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to summarise the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain the Cosmological and Ontological.
The ontological argument
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
The Ontological Argument
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
Epistemology Revision
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. A BASIC INTRODUCTION. THIS MUST BE USED AS A STARTING POINT : OTHER SHEETS, TEXT BOOK AND INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED TO HAVE.
 Born to a noble family in Italy  As a young man, joins the Benedictine Order in Normandy, France, residing in the monastery there for 30 years – 15.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
PHIL/RS 335 God’s Existence Pt. 1: The Ontological Argument.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Telelogical Ontological Cosmological Telelogical.
The Ontological Argument
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
Chapter 1: Religion Proving God: The Ontological Argument Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological argument 2 This time it’s critical!
Ontological Argument (Ontological is from the Greek word for being, named by Kant) Learning Objectives To know the specification content To know the meaning.
Philosophy of Religion Ontological Argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
Gaunilo’s response the stage one of Anselm’s argument
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
ASPECTS OF GOD OMNIPOTENCE.
The Ontological Argument
The ontological argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Arguments for The Existence of God
Philosophy MAP 2 and new topic The Idea of God
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
Challenges to the OAs The different versions of OA are challenged by:
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Kant’s criticisms of the Ontological Argument
The ontological argument: an a-priori argument (ie, deductive rather than inductive) Anselm ‘God’ is that being than which nothing greater can be conceived’;
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Norman Malcolm American philosopher. 11 June 1911 – 4 August 1990.
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
The Ontological Argument Ontological
The Ontological argument 2
The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm’s First Argument
Draw the most perfect holiday Island you can imagine...
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
A: What would Anselm say. B: What would Gaunilo say
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
Necessary Being Discussion 1
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Other versions of the ontological argument
The Ontological Argument
What makes these things different?
The Ontological Argument
Omnipotent Deity Atheist Agnostic Omnibenevolent Polytheist Analogy
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
Ontological Argument – challenges against
IN SUPPORT OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

Criticisms of the Ontological Argument

Starter Briefly outline Anslems’ first argument

Anselm v Gaunilo Students research Gaunilo’s criticism of Anslem and outline both the criticism and response by Anselm. Class members will present and argue both sides of the debate.

Gaunillo’s criticism: The ‘perfect island’ I can conceive of an island than which no greater island can be thought. Such an island must possess all perfections. Existence is a perfection. Therefore the island exists!

Plenary Summarise (bullet point) Gaunilo’s criticism and Anslem’s response.

Anselm’s response Gaunilo is saying you cannot define something into being. He is saying that God is the greatest actual being and the island is the greatest actual island Anslem is actually saying God is the greatest POSSIBLE being. This argument applies only to God.

Auquinas rejects the ontological argument There is no agreed definition of God e.g. Some people think he has a body (Aquinas thinks this is absurd). We cannot agree on a definition but even if we could, we have no way of knowing whether that definition is correct