Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ramana S. Uppoor, M.Pharm., Ph.D., R.Ph.
Advertisements

Topical Bioequivalence Update Robert Lionberger, Ph.D. Office of Generic Drugs.
Dissolution stability of a modified release product 32 nd MBSW May 19, 2009
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Dale P. Conner, Pharm.D. Division of Bioequivalence OGD, CDER, FDA
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
ivivc - A Tool for in vitro- in vivo Correlation Exploration with R
Development and validation of an in vitro–in vivo correlation for extended buspirone HCl release tablets Sevgi Takka, Adel Sakr and Arthur Goldberg Journal.
Overview of Guidance Documents and Decision process: Biopharmaceutics Section Mehul Mehta, Ph.D. Director Division of Pharmceutical Evaluation I OCPB,
A Seminar on In vitro In vivo Correlation
Pharmacokinetics & Pharmacodynamics of Controlled Release Systems Presented By: Govardhan.P Dept. of pharmaceutics, University College of Pharmaceutical.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science May 3, 2005 Factors Impacting Drug Dissolution and Absorption : Current State of Science Lawrence X. Yu,
Alan Hartford Agensys Tim Schofield Biologics Consulting Group, Inc.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Bioequivalence of Topical Drug Products
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
1-Compartment Oral Dosing 400 mg of moxifloxacin is administered orally to Mr BB, a 68 yr old male who weighs 75 kg. Blood samples were drawn following.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
CHEE 4401 Definitions drug - any substance that affects the structure or functioning of an organism pharmaceutics - the area of study concerned with the.
Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Bioavailability Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Omer Al-Mukhtar University Tobruk, Libya.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence General concepts and overview
Bioavailability of Dietary Supplements: Key Issues in Defining the Research Agenda Impact of Formulation on Bioavailability? Discussion Leader: Stephen.
Exact PK Equivalence for a bridging study Steven Novick, Harry Yang (MedImmune) and Xiang Zhang (NC State) NCB, October 2015.
Modified release products. Considerations in the evaluation of modified release products Requirements for preparing extended release products. The bioavailability.
Lawrence X. Yu, Ph.D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER, FDA ACPS Meeting, ACPS Meeting, Oct. 22, 2003 Office of Generic Drugs Research.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
BIOPHARMACEUTICS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Roma Mathew.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
1/20 PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Source: Frank M. Balis Concentration and Effect vs. Time Conc./ Amount Effect [% of E MAX ] Time Central Compartment Peripheral Compartment Effect Compartment.
The Stages of a Clinical Trial
IN VITRO IN VIVO CORRELATIONS
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Chapter 8 BIOAVAILABILITY & BIOEQUIVALENCE
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Applications of Pharmacokinetics
Quantitative Pharmacokinetics
Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
Scientific rationale for EU regulatory expectations concerning product composition in case of Class-I and Class-III medicinal products Dr Ridha BELAIBA.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Selected Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetic Calculations
1 Concentration-time curve
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Biopharmaceutics 4th year
Selvadurai Muralidharan, Kalaimani Jaya Raja Kumar
Evaluation of tablet dosage form 5) dissolution
RingCap Technology Mrs. Maria Saifee Associate Professor,
Formulation factors By Dr. A. S. Adebayo.
Pharmaceuticals Industry
Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology
REFERENCE: APPLIED CLINICAL Slideshow by: lecturer HADEEL DELMAN
Presentation transcript:

Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process in the manufacture of therapeutic agents Bioequivalence studies should be done in many instances to ensure the efficacy of the new formulations The main objective of developing and evaluating an IVIVC is to enable the dissolution test to serve as a surrogate for in vivo bioavailability studies. This may reduce the number of bioequivalence studies required for approval as well as during scale-up and post-approval changes

Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Definition according to FDA “a predictive mathematical model describing the relationship between an in-vitro property of a dosage form and an in-vivo response”. in-vitro property is the rate or extent of drug dissolution or release. in-vivo response is the plasma drug concentration or amount of drug absorbed. The first and main role in establishing IVIVC is to use dissolution test as a surrogate for human studies. The benefit is to minimize the number of bioequivalence studies performed during initial approval and during scaling up and post approval changes

CATEGORIES OF IN VITRO/IN VIVO CORRELATIONS Level A: Requires deconvolution followed by comparison of the fraction of drug absorbed to the fraction of drug dissolved. A correlation of this type is generally linear and represents a point-to-point relationship between in vitro dissolution and the in vivo input rate In a linear correlation, the in vitro dissolution and in vivo input curves may be directly superimposable or may be made to be superimposable The model should predict the entire in vivo time course from the in vitro data

Level B Uses the principle of statistical moments. The mean in vitro dissolution time is compared either to the mean residence time or to the mean in vivo dissolution time. Like A it uses all the in vitro and in vivo points It is not considered as point to point correlation The in vitro data does not reflect the actual in vivo plasma level curve

Level C A single point relationship between a dissolution papameter (for example t50%, or percent dissolved in 4 hours and a pharmaokinetic parameter (AUC, Cmax or Tmax) This level dose not reflect the complete shape of the plasma concentration time profile (which is a critical factor in SR preparations) Level D or Multiple level C It relates one or several PK parameters of interest to the amount of drug dissolved at several tine points of the dissolution profile

General consideration ! Human data should be supplied for regulatory consideration of an IVIVC. ! Bioavailability studies for IVIVC development should be performed with enough subjects to characterize adequately the performance of the drug product under study. ! Any in vitro dissolution method may be used to obtain the dissolution characteristics of the dosage form. The same system should be used for all formulations tested. ! The preferred dissolution apparatus is USP apparatus I (basket) or II (paddle). In other cases, the dissolution properties of some formulations may be determined with USP apparatus III (reciprocating cylinder) or IV (flow through cell). A Level A IVIVC is considered to be the most informative and is recommended ! Multiple Level C correlations can be as useful as Level A correlations. However, if a multiple Level C correlation is possible, then a Level A correlation is also likely and is preferred. ! Level C correlations can be useful in early stages of formulation