Child Support Trends Including 2002 Data Vicki Turetsky

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County od San Diego Department of Child Support Services County od San Diego Department of Child Support Services.
Advertisements

Child Support Cost Avoidance: 2004 NCSEA 57th Annual Training Conference and Exposition San Francisco, California August 6, 2008 Laura Wheaton The Urban.
Poverty, Welfare, and Women Chapter 12. Measuring Poverty Absolute Measure of Poverty –People living below a certain threshold Relative Income Poverty.
Paternity Establishment County% of Paternity Established For FFY 2012 % Change from FFY 2011 Rank Among Counties with caseloads greater than 50,000 Cuyahoga87.73%-0.2%4.
Incarceration among Non-custodial Parents: Implications for Welfare & Child Support Programs Pamela Caudill Ovwigho, PhD Catherine E. Born, PhD Correne.
1 Child Support Assignment and Distribution Provisions in TANF Reauthorization Bills Vicki Turetsky Center for Law and Social Policy Presented to the 2005.
Children thrive in safe, caring, supportive families and communities Title IV-D Child Support DCS Child Support Bureau - Prosecuting Attorney Collaboration.
1. 2 Social Security Act 42 USC Chapter 7 Title IV-D “The Title IV-D program was designed by Congress to save federal and state funds by recovering assigned.
CSDA Membership Meeting May Performance Incentives Modified in 1998 by Child Support Performance Incentive Act (CSPIA) Based on a State’s performance.
The Affordable Care Act Early Impacts. The main provisions of the law do not launch until However, a lot of change has taken place. Dependent Coverage:
Taxes & Government Spending Chapter 14 Section 3 Federal Spending.
Children thrive in safe, caring, supportive families and communities Title IV-D Program Overview IPAC Office Administrators Course May 8-9, 2013 Karla.
Incentives and Performance Measures – Where is the ZIP Line?
The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. Overview of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program Reduction.
0 OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Budget Outlook October 2, 2002 Office of Financial Management.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Initiative 601: Experience and Context Presentation to the House Finance Committee by the Office of Financial Management Victor Moore, Director Irv Lefberg,
Keeping Budgetary Commitments to the Poor? Texas and the Welfare Block Grant, Eva De Luna Castro, Budget and Policy Analyst, CPPP
10/27/20151 Introduction to Family Studies Welfare Reform.
Everything you want to know about Ohio’s Child Support Program.
After years of decline, education’s share of the state budget leveled off in ; actual dollars allocated to education continued to fall, however.
Access to Services at IDHS Local Offices: Granted or Denied? Dia Cirillo Work, Welfare and Families October 28, 2005.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
Modeling Health Reform in Massachusetts John Holahan June 4, 2008 THE URBAN INSTITUTE.
Chapter 17: Domestic Policy Part II (pp ).
Chapter 13: Economic Challenges Section 3. Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 2Chapter 13, Section 3 Objectives 1.Define who is poor, according.
THE NATURE OF CHILD SUPPORT AND THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN ITS RECOVERY Human & Economic Rights/Social Policy Perspectives 10 November 2015.
ork ork Work – Part 261 ä Individual Responsibility ä State Accountability ä Work Activities ä Caseload Reduction Credit ä Work Penalties ä Waivers ä.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities cbpp.org Deficits Have Fallen Sharply Since Recession.
3/8/20161 Family Sociology Welfare Reform. 3/8/20162 Families & Poverty  The percentage living below poverty has changed little over the past 20 years.
Child Support Provisions in the Deficit Reduction Act California Child Support Directors Association Training Conference October 4, 2006 By Paula Roberts.
MAKE OUR WORK COUNT October 20, CSDA Annual Child Support Training Conference and Expo Presenter: David Garcia, Butte County Department of Child.
Chapter 14 Section 3.
Taxes & Government Spending Chapter 14 Section 3 Federal Spending.
Federal Performance Measures New Directors Orientation Child Support Directors Association.
Welfare Programs May 3, TANF Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) is a federal block grant program that provides temporary financial assistance.
What’s Trending in Tribal Child Support Policy National Tribal Child Support Association Annual Training Conference June 26-30, 2016.
Disproportionate Share Payments
Health Insurance Options and Benefits.
Federal Expenditures The programs & services the federal government funds are divided into two categories. Mandatory spending—or spending that is required.
A college education significantly boosts a student’s annual and lifetime earnings.
Health Care Financing Challenges for 2009 and Beyond Michael Birnbaum Director of Policy, Medicaid Institute United Hospital Fund April 15, 2008 Funded.
Congress Considers Major Medicaid Changes
Social Welfare Policymaking
Overview of Income Redistribution Programs
Welfare Programs GOVT 2306, Module 12.
Welfare Programs May 2, 2017.
Randy Capps Immigration Studies Program The Urban Institute
HEALTH CARE POLICY.
Health Care Reform in America
Social Welfare Policymaking
Social Welfare Policymaking
WICHE Region 2017 Benchmarks: WICHE Region 2017 presents information on the West’s progress in improving access to, success in, and financing of higher.
Social Welfare Policymaking
Health Insurance Options and Benefits.
USING THE TANF EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY FUND IN ARRA TO HELP POOR FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN Select Committee on Federal Stabilization Funds March 12, 2009.
Social Welfare Policymaking
Child’s Play IBISWorld estimates 2017 daycare industry revenues were $48.9 billion, and will increase 1.9% annually to reach $52.5 billion by Private.
Government Policies and Individual Welfare
Social Welfare Policymaking
Chapter 13: Economic Challenges Section 3
Domestic Policy Domestic Policy.
“In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes. ”
G. Edward Miller, Jessica S. Banthin and Thomas M. Selden
The Federal Government
A college education significantly boosts a student’s annual and lifetime earnings.
State Board of Social Services
DART Financial Plan and Fare Structure
Debbie Henderson, Program Administrator
Copyright © 2019, The University of Pittsburgh
Presentation transcript:

Child Support Trends Including 2002 Data Vicki Turetsky Center for Law and Social Policy Presented to the 2nd National Symposium of Children, Courts, and the Federal Child Support Enforcement Program, Sponsored by the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement Chicago, IL • May 2003

Child Support Program 16.1 Million Cases in 2002 The largest group of families participating in the child support program is welfare leavers. Families who currently receive TANF assistance 2.8 million cases Families who never received assistance 5.9 million cases Families who formerly received assistance 7.4 million cases Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 1 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Caseload Trends 1988-2002 The decline in welfare cases since 1994 has caused the child support caseload to fall. Millions of Cases Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 2 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Caseload Decline 1999-2002 Between 1999 and 2002, the child support caseload declined by 7%. The caseload of current TANF families and the caseload of those who never received TANF declined steadily. Former assistance cases increased, then leveled off. Millions of Cases Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 3 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Improved Performance 1996 2002 Total collections (billions): $12 B $20 B Total cases (millions): 19 M 16 M Percent of cases with support orders: 59% 70% Collection rate for all cases: 20% 49% Collection rate for cases with orders: 35% 69% Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 4 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program $20.1 Billion Collections in 2002 Over 90% of support is collected for low-income working families who have left welfare or never received it. Collections in current assistance cases $1.7 billion Collections in cases where family never received assistance $10.2 billion Collections in former assistance cases $8.3 billion Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 5 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Increase in Collections 1999-2002 Between 1999 and 2002, child support collections increased 27%. Collections in former TANF cases increased 72%. Collections in current and never assistance cases increased in 2002 after a period of declining or flat collections. Billions Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 6 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Collections by Type of Case 2002 Total IV-D Cases Current Assistance Cases Former Assistance Cases Never Assistance Cases Cases w/orders 70% 50% 77% 72% Cases w/collections 49% 29% 51% 55% Cases w/orders and collections 69% 58% 67% Average amount of collections in all cases1 $1,254 $599 $1,125 $1,728 Average amount of collections in cases with any collections $2,575 $2,087 $2,201 $3,130 1. Annual average includes IV-D cases with zero collections, including cases lacking established paternity or support orders. Of all cases, 30% lack a support order. Of those cases with a support order, 31% have no collections. Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 6 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Average Annual Payments in Cases with Collections 1996-2002 The child support program is collecting support in more cases, but many of these cases do not pay as well. Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 7 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Collection Rates, 1991-2002 Collection rates have more than doubled since 1996, due in large part to child support reforms included in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA). Percent Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 8 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Collection rates have increased in every category of cases. Child Support Program Percent of Cases with Collections by Type of Case 1999-2002 Collection rates have increased in every category of cases. Percent Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 9 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Number of Cases with Collections 1996-2002 The number of child support cases with collections has doubled since 1996, even though the child support caseload has declined by 17%. Millions of Cases Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 10 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Percent of Cases with Support Orders 1991-2002 Support order establishment rates have increased sharply since 1999. Percent Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 11 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Percent of Cases with Support Orders by Type of Case 1999-2002 Order establishment rates have increased in every category of cases. Former TANF families are now more likely to obtain a support order than families who never participated in TANF. Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 12 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Number of Cases with Orders Established In 2002, 70% of all child support cases in the program had child support orders, compared to 59% in 1996. Although the proportion of cases with orders has increased since 1996, the number of cases with orders has not. Millions of Cases Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 13 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Number of Paternities (000) Child Support Program Number of Established and Acknowledged Paternities Per Year 1994-2002 A child’s paternity may be voluntarily acknowledged by the parents in the hospital when the child is born, or established by the court through a legal proceeding. The number of paternities acknowledged or established has more than doubled since 1994, when in-hospital procedures were implemented.1 Number of Paternities (000) 1. Numbers include IV-D and non-IV-D children whose paternity is acknowledged in the hospital. Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 14 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Performance Rates Used for Incentive Payments 2002 Federal incentive payments are now based on state performance in five areas. The chart shows nationwide performance levels, and the minimum levels a state must meet to receive at least a partial incentive payment. $2.00 40% 50% 50%, or Minimum level Nationwide level Indicator 76% Paternity establishment percentage (statewide) $4.13 Cost-effectiveness 60% Percent of cases with arrearage collections 58% Percent of current support collected 70% Percent of cases with orders 73% Paternity establishment percentage (IV-D caseload), or Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 15 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Collections and Expenditures 1996-2002 The child support program collects $4 for every dollar it spends. Billions Source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 16 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program $20.1 Billion Collections in 2002 Most support collected by the child support program is paid to families, but a fraction of collections are kept by the government to repay welfare and Medicaid benefits. Retained collections $2.1 billion Assigned collections for current and former assistance families retained by the government. Medical support $89 million Collections paid to former and never-assistance families. Medical support paid to families and retained by the government. Family collections $17.9 billion Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 17 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Retained Collections $2.1 Billion in 2002 More than half of the collections kept by the government are withheld from former TANF families. The government keeps 55% of collections for current TANF families and 15% of collections for former TANF families. Collections retained in current TANF assistance cases $919 million Collections retained in former assistance cases $1.21 billion Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 18 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Collections 1991-2002 Although total collections have almost tripled over the last decade, retained welfare collections have declined since 1997. Billions Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 19 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Retained Collections and Expenditures 1988-2002 The child support program has not paid for itself since 1988, and the gap between program costs and revenues is widening. Billions Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 20 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Retained Collections $2.1 Billion in 2002 The state retains collections for current and former assistance families and shares them with the federal government according to the state’s Federal Medicaid Assistance Percentage (FMAP). State share $950 million Federal share $1.18 billion Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 21 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Federal and State Shares of Retained Collections 1996-2002 Both federal and state shares of retained collections have fallen since 1997 and have returned to pre-1996 levels. Millions Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars. Beginning in FY 2002, incentive payments are paid with appropriated dollars, and no longer are paid out the federal share of collections. However, the incentives are subtracted to compare 2002 with prior years. (2002 preliminary data) Slide 22 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Incentive Payments 1996-2002 Federal performance incentive payments to states have fallen since 1997, in part because of declining welfare collections and in part because of new performance requirements. Millions Slide 23 Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (estimated incentives) (2002 preliminary data) Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Net Federal and State Revenues 1996-2002 Net state revenues from the child support program are higher than net federal revenues, but both federal and state revenues have fallen since 1997. Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 24 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Expenditures $5.2 Billion in 2002 The federal government pays 66% of program costs, while states pay 34%. State share $1.8 billion Federal share $3.4 billion Data source: HHS (2002 preliminary data) Slide 25 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)

Child Support Program Federal and State Shares of Expenditures 1996-2002 The federal government pays a larger share of program costs than states, but both federal and state costs have increased. Billions Data source: HHS, unadjusted dollars (2002 preliminary data) Slide 26 Center for Law and Social Policy (5/03)