Eligibility and Informed Clinical Opinion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation and Assessment
Advertisements

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Using the Child Outcomes Summary From Part II: What is the COSF Using the Child Outcomes Summary From Part II: What.
IESBVI Medicaid Billing for Part C Developmental and Orientation & Mobility Services Presenter: Jim Donoghue Medicaid Consultant Iowa Department of Education.
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP) Be an advocate Be involved Be knowledgeable.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
NECTAC Webinar Series on Early Identification and Part C Eligibility Session 2: A Rigorous Definition of Developmental Delay March 10, 2010 Steven Rosenberg,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine nMRCGP Workplace-based Assessment March 2007.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 8: Developmental Milestones Checklist - Evaluator Edition Instructions for completing the Developmental Milestones Checklist.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 10: Developmental Milestones Checklist - Service Provider Edition Instructions for completing the Developmental Milestones.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
2010 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION REPORT SUMMARY The provision of training and technical assistance (TA) to provider agencies is an integral component.
Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning, a division of Thomson Learning Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Partners in Play: Assessing Infants and Toddlers in.
Informed Clinical Opinion During Eligibility Determination Please Call Enter Code # What do you find to be your most valuable.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Screening-
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Construct Validity of the Battery of Developmental Assessment (BDA): A Model Tool for Lebanon Huda Husseini Bibi (Ed.D) Lebanese International University.
Introduction Gathering Information Observation Interviewing Norm Referenced Tools Scores Administering Why, What, How Learning Check 5 Authentic Assessment.
Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Dale.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Introduction Gathering Information Observation Interviewing Norm Referenced Tools Authentic Assessment Characteristics of Authentic Assessment – 7M’s Validity.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
Dr. Sarbjit Saini TPD – Sandwell VTS. What we will be covering When to complete ESR Creating a review period What is contained in an ESR Collecting.
Part C Eligibility (Part H). Eligibility Criteria: Children ages birth through two who are developmentally delayed or are at established risk for developmental.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
The NC Infant Toddler Program: Together We Grow Policy information taken N.C. Infant-Toddler Program Manual.
Essential Assessment Then & Now Karen E. Blankenship 1.
Evaluation for Eligibility l 8/26/05 3 Evaluation2 Objectives  To ensure that school staff are aware of evaluation /reevaluation procedures under IDEA.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Johnson, J., Rahn, N., and Bricker, D., 2015 ECSE 672 Fall 2015 ACTIVITY-BASED APPROACH TO EARLY INTERVENTION.
Nondiscriminatory Evaluations NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
1 Early Intervention Program Referral and Services.
1 Early Intervention Program Referrals and Services March 18, 2016.
Assessment.
Advocacy Using Assessment of FASD in Schools
FAMILY HEALTH NURSING PROCESS
Understanding the IEP Process
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Learning Objectives Identify the steps for eliciting concerns and conducting developmental surveillance and screening with families from culturally and.
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
CHAPTER 7: Developmental Assessment
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
SPE 574 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
SPE 574 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
New IFSP – Policy and Procedures Update
Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Gather data from all assessment procedures to be synthesized.
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP)
Chapter 1 Special Education Assessment.
Chris Russell Sam Morgan Hunter College SPED 746
Update from ECO: Possible Approaches to Measuring Outcomes
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Functional Vision Evaluation
OSCE Interest group 3rd April 2009 Barry Ricketts
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Chapter 1 Assessment Basics
Presentation transcript:

Eligibility and Informed Clinical Opinion Beth Konde MS, OTR/L Shriners Hospital June 10, 2015

Eligibility Based on a synthesis of the data gathered from all assessment activities Medical records Administration of a norm-referenced assessment A family assessment Observation of the child in typical routines and activities A diagnosis of a medical condition that has a high probability of resulting in a developmental delay. A developmental delay in one or more areas as documented on a norm-referenced assessment of 1.5 standard deviations below the mean or a delay of 25% from the child’s chronological age and informed clinical opinion.

Informed Clinical Opinion (ICO) Appears in IDEA part C Used by EI professionals in the evaluation and assessment process to make recommendations for eligibility Uses Qualitative and Quantitative information Difficult to measure aspects of development What are some of the aspects of development that are difficult to measure? What types of assessment tools can providers use to measure difficult areas of development?

What ICO is not! Informed Clinical Opinion is not “eyeballing” a child for a few minutes and deciding whether or not she is eligible.

Key Components of ICO Multiple Sources of information Expertise and Experience Synthesizing

Multiple Sources of Information Parent observation and report Medical and Health information Provider observation

Expertise and Experience ICO may be used by qualified personnel to establish a child’s eligibility even when other instruments do no not establish eligibility

Provider Skills Needed The ability to use informed clinical opinion requires: Appropriate Training Previous experience Cultural sensitivity Ability to gather and use family perceptions

Synthesizing and Documenting The team synthesizes and interprets all available information Documentation should include: Who was involved on the team Description of procedures used Description of the functioning of the child State the decision of the team and rationale