The LHC Machine Jörg Wenninger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rüdiger Schmidt - Wuppertal Januar Der LHC Beschleuniger Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN Universität Wuppertal Januar 2004 Herausforderungen LHC Beschleunigerphysik.
Advertisements

Transverse dynamics Selected topics, University of Oslo, Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2014,
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
1 The LHC Accelerator Complex Jörg Wenninger CERN Accelerators and Beams Department Operations group Hadron Collider Summer School - June 2007 Part 1:
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
1 LHC : construction and operation Jörg Wenninger CERN Beams Department / Operation group LNF Spring School 'Bruno Touschek' - May 2010 Part 1: Introduction.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
1 Commissioning challenges of the LHC Jörg Wenninger CERN Accelerators and Beams Department Operations group February 2008 LHC overview Magnets Luminosity.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
1 The LHC Machine Jörg Wenninger CERN Beams Department / Operations group Hadron Collider Summer School - June 2009 Part 1: Introduction to acc. physics.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Rüdiger Schmidt CERN September Der LHC Beschleuniger Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN 10 September 2009 Vortrag für Physiklehrer Challenges LHC accelerator.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
REQUIREMENTS FOR FCC DILUTION KICKERS AND BEAM DUMP LINE GEOMETRY F. Burkart, W. Bartmann, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, T. Kramer FCC dump meeting 18 th June.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Rüdiger Schmidt1 The LHC collider project I Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN SUSSP Sumer School St.Andrews Challenges LHC accelerator physics LHC technology Operation.
Accelerator Design: the nuts and bolts…and gaskets and resistors Elvin Harms Beams Division/Fermilab
HST 2009 Introduction to AcceleratorsD. Brandt 1 The LHC: Physics without mathematics ! D. Brandt, CERN.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 Operational challenges of the LHC Jörg Wenninger CERN Accelerators and Beams Department Operations group November 2007 Part 1: LHC overview and status.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Dipole magnets A dipole magnet gives a constant B-field.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
contribution to the round table discussion
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Operational challenges of the LHC
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
The Status of the LHC machine
The LHC Accelerator Complex
Operational challenges of the LHC
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Introduction to particle accelerators
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
LHC : construction and operation
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
LHC Machine Advisory Committee, CERN 12th June 2008
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

The LHC Machine Jörg Wenninger CERN Beams Department / Operations group Hadron Collider Summer School - June 2009 Part 1: Introduction to acc. physics LHC magnet and layout Luminosity and inter. Regions

Outline The LHC challenges Introduction to magnets and particle focusing LHC magnets and arc layout LHC luminosity and interaction regions Machine protection Incident 19th Sept. 2008 LHC commissioning and operation Part 1 Part 2

LHC History 1982 : First studies for the LHC project 1983 : Z0/W discovered at SPS proton antiproton collider (SppbarS) 1989 : Start of LEP operation (Z/W boson-factory) 1994 : Approval of the LHC by the CERN Council 1996 : Final decision to start the LHC construction 2000 : Last year of LEP operation above 100 GeV 2002 : LEP equipment removed 2003 : Start of LHC installation 2005 : Start of LHC hardware commissioning 2008 : Start of (short) beam commissioning Powering incident on 19th Sept. 2009 : Repair, re-commissioning and beam commissioning

7 years of construction to replace : LEP: 1989-2000 e+e- collider 4 experiments max. energy 104 GeV circumference 26.7 km in the same tunnel by LHC : 2008-2020+ proton-proton & ion-ion collider in the LEP tunnel 4+ experiments energy 7 TeV CMS LHCB ATLAS ALICE

Tunnel circumference 26.7 km, tunnel diameter 3.8 m Depth : ~ 70-140 m – tunnel is inclined by ~ 1.4%

LHC – yet another collider? The LHC surpasses existing accelerators/colliders in 2 aspects : The energy of the beam of 7 TeV that is achieved within the size constraints of the existing 26.7 km LEP tunnel. LHC dipole field 8.3 T HERA/Tevatron ~ 4 T The luminosity of the collider that will reach unprecedented values for a hadron machine: LHC pp ~ 1034 cm-2 s-1 Tevatron pp 3x1032 cm-2 s-1 SppbarS pp 6x1030 cm-2 s-1 The combination of very high field magnets and very high beam intensities required to reach the luminosity targets makes operation of the LHC a great challenge ! A factor 2 in field A factor 4 in size A factor 30 in luminosity

Field challenges y s B v F x The force on a charged particle is given by the Lorentz force which is proportional to the charge, and to the vector product of velocity and magnetic field: y x s v B F To reach a momentum of 7 TeV/c given the LHC (LEP) bending radius of 2805 m: Bending field B = 8.33 Tesla Superconducting magnets To collide two counter-rotating proton beams, the beams must be in separate vaccum chambers (in the bending sections) with opposite B field direction.  There are actually 2 LHCs and the magnets have a 2-magnets-in-one design!

Luminosity challenges The event rate N for a physics process with cross-section s is proprotional to the collider Luminosity L: k = number of bunches = 2808 N = no. protons per bunch = 1.15×1011 f = revolution frequency = 11.25 kHz s*x,s*y = beam sizes at collision point (hor./vert.) = 16 mm To maximize L: Many bunches (k) Many protons per bunch (N) A small beam size s*u = (b *e)1/2 b * : characterizes the beam envelope (optics), varies along the ring, min. at the collision points. e : is the phase space volume occupied by the beam (constant along the ring). High beam “brillance” N/e (particles per phase space volume)  Injector chain performance ! Small envelope  Strong focusing ! Optics property Beam property

LHC Layout The main dipole magnets define the geometry of the circle ! 8 arcs. 8 long straight sections (insertions), ~ 700 m long. beam 1 : clockwise beam 2 : counter-clockwise The beams exchange their positions (inside/outside) in 4 points to ensure that both rings have the same circumference ! Beam dump blocks IR5:CMS IR4: RF + Beam instrumentation IR6: Beam dumping system IR3: Momentum collimation (normal conducting magnets) IR7: Betatron collimation (normal conducting magnets) The main dipole magnets define the geometry of the circle ! IR8: LHC-B IR2:ALICE IR1: ATLAS Injection ring 1 Injection ring 2

LHC and its injectors LHC LEIR CPS SPS Booster LINACS 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 Top energy/GeV Circumference/m Linac 0.05 30 PSB 1.4 157 CPS 26 628 = 4 PSB SPS 450 6’911 = 11 x PS LHC 7000 26’657 = 27/7 x SPS LEIR CPS SPS Booster LINACS LHC 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 Ions protons Beam 1 Beam 2 TI8 TI2 The energy gain/machine of 10 to 20 is typical for the useful range of magnets !!!

Basics of Accelerator Physics

Dipole fields y s B v F x South y B x North Dipole magnets are the simplest accelerator magnets and have ‘just’ 2 poles. Their field is constant across the magnet. They are used to bend the beam and define the reference path. The dipoles define the beam MOMENTUM ! y x s v B F South y B x North

Quadrupolar field - focusing A quadrupole magnet has 4 poles, 2 north and 2 south. The poles are arranged symmetrically around the axis of the magnet. There is no magnetic field along the central axis. The field increases linearly with distance to the axis. y x B f In a given plane, the quadrupole has the same properties like a classical optical lens.

Looking in the direction Focusing But a quadrupole differs from an optical lens : It is focusing in one plane, defocusing in the other !!! y y Looking in the direction of the particles x x x Defocusing in the horizontal plane y Focusing in the vertical plane s s

Accelerator lattice horizontal plane Focusing in both planes is achieved by a succession of focusing and defocusing quadrupole magnets : The FODO structure vertical plane

LHC arc lattice Dipole- und Quadrupol magnets Sextupole magnets Provide a stable trajectory for particles with nominal momentum. Sextupole magnets Correct the trajectories for off momentum particles (‚chromatic‘ errors). Multipole-corrector magnets Sextupole - and decapole corrector magnets at end of dipoles Used to compensate field imperfections if the dipole magnets. To stabilize trajectories for particles at larger amplitudes – beam lifetime ! One rarely talks about the multipole magnets, but they are also essential for the good machine performance !

Fits through the hole of a needle! Beam envelope CMS collision point ARC cells ARC cells Fits through the hole of a needle! The envelope of the size beam is given by the so-called ‘b’-function ( optics): In the arcs the optics follows a regular pattern. In the long straight sections, the optics is matched to the ‘telescope’ that provides very strong focusing at the collision point. Collision point size (rms, defined by ‘b*’): CMS & ATLAS : 16 mm LHCb : 22 – 160 mm ALICE : 16 mm (ions) / >160 mm (p)

Acceleration Acceleration is performed using electric fields that are fed into Radio-Frequency (RF) cavities. RF cavities are basically resonators tuned to a selected frequency. To accelerate a proton to 7 TeV, a potential of 7 TV must be provided to the beam: In circular accelerators the acceleration is done in small steps, turn after turn. At the LHC the acceleration from 450 GeV to 7 TeV lasts ~ 20 minutes, with an average energy gain of ~ 0.5 MeV on each turn. s

Synchrotron radiation loss LHC RF system The LHC RF system operates at 400 MHz. It is composed of 16 superconducting cavities, 8 per beam. Peak accelerating voltage of 16 MV/beam. For LEP at 104 GeV : 3600 MV/beam ! Synchrotron radiation loss LHC @ 7 TeV 6.7 keV /turn LEP @ 104 GeV ~3 GeV /turn The LHC beam radiates a sufficient amount of visible photons to be actually observable with a camera ! (total power ~ 0.2 W/m)

The particles oscillate back and forth in time/energy RF buckets and bunches The particles oscillate back and forth in time/energy The particles are trapped in the RF voltage: this gives the bunch structure RF Voltage 2.5 ns time E LHC bunch spacing = 25 ns = 10 buckets  7.5 m RF bucket time 2.5 ns 450 GeV 7 TeV RMS bunch length 11.2 cm 7.6 cm RMS energy spread 0.031% 0.011%

Magnets & Tunnel

Superconductivity Bc Tc The very high DIPOLE field of 8.3 Tesla required to achieve 7 TeV/c can only be obtained with superconducting magnets ! The material determines: Tc critical temperature Bc critical field The cable production determines: Jc critical current density Lower temperature  increased current density  higher fields. Typical for NbTi @ 4.2 K 2000 A/mm2 @ 6T To reach 8-10 T, the temperature must be lowered to 1.9 K – superfluid Helium ! Bc Tc

The superconducting cable 6 m 1 mm A.Verweij Typical value for operation at 8T and 1.9 K: 800 A width 15 mm Rutherford cable A.Verweij

Coils for dipoles Dipole length 15 m I = 11’800 A @ 8.3 T The coils must be aligned very precisely to ensure a good field quality (i.e. ‘pure’ dipole)

Steel cylinder for Helium Ferromagnetic iron Non-magnetic collars Superconducting coil Beam tube Steel cylinder for Helium Insulation vacuum Vacuum tank Supports Weight (magnet + cryostat) ~ 30 tons, Length 15 m Rüdiger Schmidt 25

Regular arc: Magnets 1232 main dipoles + 3700 multipole corrector magnets (sextupole, octupole, decapole) 392 main quadrupoles + 2500 corrector magnets (dipole, sextupole, octupole) J. Wenninger - ETHZ - December 2005 26

Regular arc: Cryogenics Connection via service module and jumper Static bath of superfluid helium at 1.9 K in cooling loops of 110 m length Supply and recovery of helium with 26 km long cryogenic distribution line J. Wenninger - ETHZ - December 2005 27

Regular arc: Vacuum Beam vacuum for Beam 1 + Beam 2 Insulation vacuum for the magnet cryostats Insulation vacuum for the cryogenic distribution line J. Wenninger - ETHZ - December 2005 28

Tunnel view (1)

Tunnel view (2)

Complex interconnects Many complex connections of super-conducting cable that will be buried in a cryostat once the work is finished. This SC cable carries 12’000 A for the main quadrupole magnets CERN visit McEwen

Vacuum chamber The beams circulate in two ultra-high vacuum chambers, P ~ 10-10 mbar. A Copper beam screen protects the bore of the magnet from heat deposition due to image currents, synchrotron light etc from the beam. The beam screen is cooled to T = 4-20 K. 50 mm 36 mm Beam screen Magnet bore Cooling channel (Helium) Beam envel. ~ 1.8 mm @ 7 TeV

Luminosity and Interaction Regions

Luminosity Let us look at the different factors in this formula, and what we can do to maximize L, and what limitations we may encounter !! f : the revolution frequency is given by the circumference, f=11.246 kHz. N : the bunch population – N=1.15x1011 protons - Injectors (brighter beams) - Collective interactions of the particles - Beam encounters k : the number of bunches – k=2808 - Injectors (more beam) - Collective interactions of the particles - Interaction regions - Beam encounters s* : the size at the collision point – s*y=s*x=16 mm - Injectors (brighter beams) - More focusing – stronger quadrupoles For k = 1:

Collective (in-)stability The electromagnetic field of a bunch interacts with the chamber walls (finite resistivity !), cavities, discontinuities etc that it encounters: The fields act back on the bunch itself or on following bunches. Since the fields induced by of a bunch increase with bunch intensity, the bunches may become COLLECTIVELY unstable beyond a certain intensity, leading to poor lifetime or massive looses intensity loss. Such effects can be very strong in the LHC injectors, and they will also affect the LHC – in particular because we have a lot of carbon collimators (see later) that have a very bad influence on beam stability !  limits the intensity per bunch and per beam !

‘Beam-beam’ interaction When a particle of one beam encounters the opposing beam at the collision point, it senses the fields of the opposing beam. Due to the typically Gaussian shape of the beams in the transverse direction, the field (force) on this particle is non-linear, in particular at large amplitudes ! The effect of the non-linear fields can become so strong (when the beams are intense) that large amplitude particles become unstable and are lost from the machine:  poor lifetime  background THE INTERACTION OF THE BEAMS SETS A LIMIT ON THE BUNCH INTENSITY! Quadrupole lens Beam(-beam) lens

Combining the beams for collisions The 2 LHC beams circulate in separate vacuum chambers in most of the ring, but they must be brought together to collide. Over a distance of about 260 m, the beams circulate in the same vacuum chamber and they are a total of ~ 120 long distance beam encounters in ATLAS, CMS, ALICE and LHCb.

COLLIDE WITH A CROSSING ANGLE IN ONE PLANE ! Crossing angles Since every collision adds to our ‘Beam-beam budget’ we must avoid un-necessary direct beam encounters where the beams share a common vacuum: COLLIDE WITH A CROSSING ANGLE IN ONE PLANE ! There is a price to pay : A reduction of the luminosity due to the finite bunch length of 7.6 cm and the non-head on collisions  L reduction of ~ 17%. IP Crossing planes & angles ALTAS Vertical 280 mrad CMS Horizontal 280 mrad LHCb Horizontal 300 mrad ALICE Vertical 400 mrad 7.5 m

Separation and crossing : ATLAS Horizontal plane: the beams are combined and then separated 194 mm ATLAS IP ~ 260 m Common vacuum chamber Vertical plane: the beams are deflected to produce a crossing angle at the IP Not to scale ! ~ 7 mm

Collision schemes The 400 MHz RF system provides 35’640 possible bunch positions (buckets) at a distance of 2.5 ns along the LHC circumference. A priori any of those positions could be filled with a bunch… The smallest bunch-to-bunch distance is fixed to 25 ns, which is also the nominal distance: limits the max. number of bunches to 3564. In practice there are fewer bunches because holes must be provided for the fast pulsed magnets (kickers) used for injection and dump. But the LHC is very flexible and can operate with many bunch patterns. 2.5 ns 25 ns = bunch position = filled position …

Collision point symmetry LHC CMS Atlas Alice LHCb displaced by c x 37.5 ns = 11.25 m LHCb Symmetry axis ATLAS, ALICE and CMS are positioned on the LEP symmetry axis (8 fold sym.) LHCb is displaced from the symmetry axis by 11.25 m <<-->> 37.5 ns. For filling patterns with many bunches this is not an issue, but it becomes a bit tricky with few bunches.

Filling pattern example: 1x1 LHC CMS Atlas Alice LHCb With 1 bunch per beam, there are 2 collision points at opposite sides of the ring. Depending on their position along the circumference, the 2 bunches can be made to collide: in ATLAS and CMS, OR in ALICE, in LHCb, but never in all experiments at the same time !!

Nominal bunch distance (ns) Filling patterns Schema Nominal bunch distance (ns) No. bunches Comment 43x43 2025 43 No crossing angle required 156x156 525 156 25 ns 25 2808 Nominal p filling 50 ns 50 1404 75 ns 75 936 Ion nominal 100 592 Nominal ion filling Ion early 1350 62 In the 43x43 and 156x156 schemes, some bunches are displaced (distance  nominal) to balance the ALICE and LHCb luminosities. For the multi-bunch schemes (25, 50, 75, 100 ns) there are larger gaps to accommodate fast injection magnets (‘kickers’) risetimes. All schemes have a ≥ 3 ms long particle free gap for the beam dump kicker.

Nominal filling pattern The nominal pattern consists of 39 groups of 72 bunches (spaced by 25 ns), with variable spacing to accommodate the rise times of the injection and extraction magnets (‘kickers’). There is a long 3 ms gap (t5)for the LHC dump kicker (see later). 72 bunches t5 t3 b=bunch, e=empty t2 t1

Tevatron I Tricky to operate !! E E The Tevatron is presently the ‘energy frontier’ collider in operation at FNAL, with a beam energy of 980 GeV and a size of ~ ¼ LHC. It is the first super-conducting collider ever build. It collides proton and anti-proton bunches that circulate in opposite directions in the SAME vacuum chamber. One of the problems at the TEVATRON are the long-distance encounters of the bunches in the arc sections. A complicated separation scheme with electrostatic elements has to be used: Tricky to operate !! E E

Tevatron II The Tevatron has undergone a number of remarkable upgrades and it presently collides 36 proton with 36 anti-proton bunches (k=36), with bunch populations (N) similar to the ones of the LHC (but there are always fewer anti-protons !). Compare LHC and Tevatron: fTevatron  4 fLHC Tevatron gets a factor 4 ‘for free’ because of ring size !! kLHC  100 kTevatron LLHC  30 LTevatron N2/(sx sy) ~ equal Luminosity gain of LHC comes basically from the number of bunches (k) !!