1 Where does the Exclusionary Rule Not Apply? Civil cases and proceedings Civil cases and proceedings Evidence obtained in a private search by a private.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT Constitutional Law.
Advertisements

Exclusionary Rule Chapter Rights of the accused The heart of the guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures and self incrimination lies.
Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply
CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice
Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11th Edition
Exclusionary Rule ACG 6935/4939.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Open.
Chapter 9 The Exclusionary Rule.
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence.
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
The Fourth and Fifth Amendments How do they protect our rights?
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
+ Protecting Individual Liberties Section 1 Chapter 14.
Winning, until proven guilty …. Searches and Seizures The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Searches must be conducted.
Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.
The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.
Chapter Nine – Searches and Seizures Not Fully Protected by the Fourth Amendment: Plain View, Open Fields, Abandonment, and Border Searches Rolando V.
Review of Exceptions to Warrant Rule Vehicles Open fields Anything with consent Abandoned property Inventory Plain view.
School district attorneys help to develop searches and seizures policies. School districts should provide trainings at schools in order to make sure of.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Policing Legal Aspects Go to this Site. Due Process Most Due Process requirements are in either: –evidence and investigation –arrest –interrogation All.
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
The Bill of Rights The First Fundamental Changes of the Constitution.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure. The 4 th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against.
Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.
Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and other Evidence Obtaining Physical and other Evidence.
Criminal Justice-- Investigations Chapter 12—Due Process Rights of Suspects under 4 th & 5 th Amendments.
Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Five: The Exclusion of Evidence This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Chapter 6: Police and the Constitution.
Chapter Four – The Exclusionary Rule
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Six: Warrantless Arrests and Searches This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply
4 th Amendment: Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects personal privacy, and every citizen's right to be free from.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
4 th Amendment Timothy Bian, Myris Kramsch, Mazen Elhosseiny, Daniel Alday, John Scott, Kartik Raju.
Slide 1 III. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution A.Analyze and Define Criminal Procedure B.Analyze the provisions of the 4 th and 5 th Amendments pertaining.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
LAWFUL OR UNLAWFUL SEARCH? YOU BE THE JUDGE. 1. Mr. H searches your Locker 2. You go through a metal detector at school.
Chapter 12: Criminal Justice Process ~ The Investigation Objective: Student should be able to correlate how the constitution relates to an investigation.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 6 Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement: Plain View, Open Fields, Abandoned.
© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights Reserved Class Name, Instructor Name Date, Semester Lasley & Guskos,
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Automobile Searches: exceptions to the warrant requirement Criminal Justice.
Evidence Collection at the Crime Scene and Constitutional Law
Rules of Evidence.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PROPERTY
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
Search and Seizure Part II.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Search and Seizure Concepts
Thinker The first ten amendments are also known as:
Chapter 9 The Exclusionary Rule.
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATIVE PHASE
Search and Seizure Part II.
Class Name, Instructor Name
Analyze The Exclusionary Rule
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
Search and Seizure Part II.
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
Presentation transcript:

1 Where does the Exclusionary Rule Not Apply? Civil cases and proceedings Civil cases and proceedings Evidence obtained in a private search by a private person Evidence obtained in a private search by a private person A defendant does not have standing or if no right of privacy of the defendant has been violated A defendant does not have standing or if no right of privacy of the defendant has been violated Evidence obtained from a abandoned property will not be suppressed Evidence obtained from a abandoned property will not be suppressed

2 Chapter 10 Where the Exclusionary Rule Does not Apply Where the Exclusionary Rule Does not Apply

3 Evidence found in open fields or when evidence is discovered in plain view Evidence found in open fields or when evidence is discovered in plain view Evidence is obtained where the Good Faith rule or the Honest Mistake rule apply Evidence is obtained where the Good Faith rule or the Honest Mistake rule apply Evidence obtained by a law officer who has lawful authority to seize the evidence Evidence obtained by a law officer who has lawful authority to seize the evidence Where does the Exclusionary Rule Not Apply? Cont….

4 Evidence obtained in a private search by a private person Evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment is inadmissible. Evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment is inadmissible. This prohibition applies to mistakes or misconducts by. police and other officials in the executive branch of govt, NOT by private citizens This prohibition applies to mistakes or misconducts by. police and other officials in the executive branch of govt, NOT by private citizens

5 Evidence obtained in a private search by a private person The exclusionary rule does not apply to private persons The exclusionary rule does not apply to private persons Evidence obtained by private persons, even if the result of illegal conduct, is not subject to…. Evidence obtained by private persons, even if the result of illegal conduct, is not subject to…. *Exclusionary Rule *Exclusionary Rule Supreme Court held in what case? Supreme Court held in what case? *Burdeau v. McDowell *Burdeau v. McDowell

6 Exclusionary rule applies in ONLY in criminal cases. The exclusionary rule forbids the use of evidence tainted or spoiled by improper or illegal police conduct in criminal cases. The exclusionary rule forbids the use of evidence tainted or spoiled by improper or illegal police conduct in criminal cases. This evidence can be used in… This evidence can be used in… Civil Cases Civil Cases Which case did this apply to? Which case did this apply to? O.J. Simpson O.J. Simpson

7 If a defendant does not have standing or if no right of privacy of the defendant has been violated The exclusionary rule does not apply The exclusionary rule does not apply Evidence is excluded by the defendant making a motion to suppress that evidence Evidence is excluded by the defendant making a motion to suppress that evidence To succeed in this motion, the defendant MUST show that his rights were violated, not the rights of some other person To succeed in this motion, the defendant MUST show that his rights were violated, not the rights of some other person

8 Standing Meaning the defendant is the proper person to challenge the police conduct because it violated the defendants rights specifically. Meaning the defendant is the proper person to challenge the police conduct because it violated the defendants rights specifically.

9 Evidence obtained from abandoned property will not be suppressed If by conduct or words the defendant shows that he/she has relinquished the expectation privacy in property, the object can be used as evidence If by conduct or words the defendant shows that he/she has relinquished the expectation privacy in property, the object can be used as evidence Which case defined the legal concept of abandonment? Which case defined the legal concept of abandonment? United States v. Thomas 1989 United States v. Thomas 1989

10 Throwaway as a type of abandonment Persons fleeing the police with illegal drugs or other contraband on their person will throw away what can be very incriminating Persons fleeing the police with illegal drugs or other contraband on their person will throw away what can be very incriminating If the throw away is a voluntary abandonment of the objects the court will If the throw away is a voluntary abandonment of the objects the court will Allow the object to be used as evidence Allow the object to be used as evidence If the throwaway is the direct or indirect product of an illegal police stop or other improper police conduct, the courts will If the throwaway is the direct or indirect product of an illegal police stop or other improper police conduct, the courts will Generally forbid the use of the throwaway item as evidence Generally forbid the use of the throwaway item as evidence

11 Denial of Ownership as a form of abandonment Persons who deny ownership of property to a law enforcement officer relinquish their right of privacy in the property and do not later have a standing to challenge the use of evidence obtained from the property Persons who deny ownership of property to a law enforcement officer relinquish their right of privacy in the property and do not later have a standing to challenge the use of evidence obtained from the property

12 Examples of denial cases that have come before criminal courts Airport denial of luggage. Airport denial of luggage. Train passengers denial of a garment bag. Train passengers denial of a garment bag. Denial of luggage in the trunk of car. Denial of luggage in the trunk of car. Denial of a satchel that the defendant hid after a car accident. Denial of a satchel that the defendant hid after a car accident. Denial of ownership of an apartment Denial of ownership of an apartment

13 Evidence obtained from a garbage or trash Trash receptacles kept in a home or garage have fourth amendment constitutional protection. Trash receptacles kept in a home or garage have fourth amendment constitutional protection. Evidence obtained from these places without valid consent or a search warrant would be suppressed. Evidence obtained from these places without valid consent or a search warrant would be suppressed. One who disposes of personal property in a trash bin and placed it at curbside or in a common trash receptacle, generally is held to have abandoned the property One who disposes of personal property in a trash bin and placed it at curbside or in a common trash receptacle, generally is held to have abandoned the property (Calif. V Greenwood) (Calif. V Greenwood)

14 Abandoned Motor Vehicles United States v. Oswald United States v. Oswald US court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, 783 F.2d 663 (1986) Defendant was transporting $300,000 worth of cocaine in a stolen car when the car caught on fire. Oswald fled from the car thinking it would blow up. He did not report the fire. When the authorities put out the fire they took all of the personal items out of the car before having it towed. They then found the suitcase full of cocaine. Defendant was transporting $300,000 worth of cocaine in a stolen car when the car caught on fire. Oswald fled from the car thinking it would blow up. He did not report the fire. When the authorities put out the fire they took all of the personal items out of the car before having it towed. They then found the suitcase full of cocaine. With the car being abandoned for more than a hour and half they were able to use the evidence in court. With the car being abandoned for more than a hour and half they were able to use the evidence in court.

15 Evidence discovered in open fields WILL NOT be suppressed Curtilage- is that area close to a home where persons assert of right of privacy. Curtilage- is that area close to a home where persons assert of right of privacy. The protection of the fourth amendment extends to the home and the curtilage. The protection of the fourth amendment extends to the home and the curtilage. US Supreme Court defined curtilage as follows in 1984: US Supreme Court defined curtilage as follows in 1984: Persons living in a single-family home have a greater expectation of privacy in their curtilage than a large apartment building Persons living in a single-family home have a greater expectation of privacy in their curtilage than a large apartment building

The U.S. Supreme Court held that… Curtilage questions should be resolved with the reference to four factors: Curtilage questions should be resolved with the reference to four factors: The proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home The proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home Whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home Whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home The nature of the uses to which the area is put The nature of the uses to which the area is put The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by the people passing by The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by the people passing by

17 Evidence discovered in good faith or honest mistake will not be suppressed The Good Faith Exception The Good Faith Exception 1984 the US Supreme Court case of United States v. Leon 1984 the US Supreme Court case of United States v. Leon The Leon Good Faith rule permits the use of evidence where a search warrant contains a technical error that does not violate a fundamental constitutional right of a suspect. The Leon Good Faith rule permits the use of evidence where a search warrant contains a technical error that does not violate a fundamental constitutional right of a suspect.

18 The Honest mistake Rule U.S. Supreme Court case of Maryland v. Garrison (1987) U.S. Supreme Court case of Maryland v. Garrison (1987) The Supreme Court pointed out that the court has recognized the need to allow some latitude for honest mistakes that are made by officers in the dangerous and difficult process of making arrests and executing search warrants The Supreme Court pointed out that the court has recognized the need to allow some latitude for honest mistakes that are made by officers in the dangerous and difficult process of making arrests and executing search warrants