WESTAR Increment Recommendations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Advertisements

New Source Review Reform Vera S. Kornylak, Associate Regional Counsel EPA Region 4 Office of Regional Counsel and Gregg Worley, Chief, Air Permits Section,
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
AgTech Committee Agricultural Research Projects Request for Direction by the Study Agency San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Villa Florence Hotel San Francisco, CA April 9-11, 2003.
North Dakota’s Approach to a Periodic Review to Determine the Status of Consumption of PSD Class I Sulfur Dioxide Increments WESTAR Fall Technical Conference,
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Treatment of Natural Events WESTAR Planning Committee & WESTAR NEP Workgroup March 28, 2006.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
New Source Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD): Refinement of Increment Modeling Procedures Proposal Jessica Montañez.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
FLMs, PSD Increment, and AQRVs: the Oregon experience WESTAR Fall Technical Conference Seattle September 2003 Philip Allen, Oregon DEQ.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
Life After Class I Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest County Potawatomi NTF 2011.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
CAA Program Reporting Clarification Regarding Federally-Reportable Violations for Clean Air Act Stationary Sources (March 2010) (FRV Clarification Memo)
NSR and Title V Activities WESTAR Business Meeting May 2005.
Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
1 The Exceptional Events Rule (EER) Overview Tom Link EPA – OAQPS Geographic Strategies Group Westar Meeting, San Francisco, February 25, 2009.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Miscellaneous Stuff William Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 3, 2007.
1 Update on New Source Review (NSR) Activities and Priorities for Information Transfer and Program Integration Division April 7, 2004.
Regional Haze, PM, and Permits Update WESTAR Fall Meeting September 26, 2006.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
David Klemp State of Montana
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Sources Committee Presentation Spring 2003 WESTAR Business Meeting
Coal Mining Activities
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Bill Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 8, 2009
Coal Mining Activities
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
WESTAR PSD New Framework
WRAP Workplan WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations and Action Items
WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
WESTAR Business Meeting April 7, 2004 Tempe, Arizona
PSD Reform Recommendations
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
John Bunyak National Park Service
New Source Review Update
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
Wildland Fire Policy Revision
David Klemp State of Montana
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Technical Coordinator Report
Presentation transcript:

WESTAR Increment Recommendations March 2006

WESTAR Recommendations Recommendation 1: SILs Recommendation 2: Periodic reviews using a “tiered” approach with the rigor and cycle of analysis tied to increment consumption conditions in the air quality planning area. Recommendation 3: Cumulative increment analyses should be consistent within and across States. EPA, with input from WESTAR, prepare guidelines that delineate both the geographic scope and the categories of sources that should be included in emissions inventories and how they should be included for use in PSD program implementation. Recommendation 4: Develop a menu of emissions calculation approaches and guiding principles for use when preparing emissions inventories for cumulative PSD increment analyses.

WESTAR Recommendations Recommendation 5: Regulatory basis for Air Quality Related Values cumulative analysis. Recommendation 6: FLAG guidance is a useful tool supporting AQRV impact analyses provided that expectations around the use of threshold values are clarified acceptably. Recommendation 7: WESTAR recommends that an explicit consultation relationship be established between States and FLMs to develop policy approaches for the use of “critical loads” information for pollutants in Class I areas. Recommendation 8: WESTAR recommends that modeled indications of increment violations associated with PSD Major Source permit actions should be addressed in a manner that provides time to refine models to ensure accurate results, but would ultimately result in denial of the permit application in the absence of mitigation measures adequate to address impacts that could be directly attributed to the proposed source.

WESTAR Recommendations Recommendation 9: EPA adopt a tiered response process to provide permitting authorities flexibility to address formal findings of increment violations identified during Periodic Review or a permitting action. Recommendation 10: A tiered response system should be developed to provide permitting authorities flexibility to address adverse AQRV impacts identified during AQRV impact analyses. Recommendation 11: New technical tools and emissions data should be used when they become available for future analysis involving evaluating and planning air quality management. However, fair and equitable approaches must be sought when addressing increment exceedances associated with revised assumptions and/or techniques. Recommendation 12: EPA explicitly acknowledge the roles that ambient monitoring information can play in PSD program implementation.

WESTAR Recommendations Recommendation 13: States and FLMs should recognize the importance of, and work to improve where necessary, communication, coordination, and public notification expectations and procedures associated with PSD permitting activities. Recommendation 14: In the context of single source permit and Periodic Review inter-jurisdictional emissions impacts, WESTAR encourages States to consult early and often and agree in advance on modeling protocols to enable consistency between the States in performing the analyses and to ensure equity in application of the analysis. WESTAR further recommends EPA take steps to ensure EPA Regions, in partnership with States and FLMs, operate consistently among themselves in inter-jurisdictional contexts and develop data and methods that will better enable inter-jurisdictional analysis.

Priority Permitting Rulemakings NSR Applicability for Electric Utilities Supplemental notice and final rule Notice of data availability – NO2 Increments and Clean Air Interstate Rule Debottlenecking and Aggregation Rule Potential to Emit Rule (NSR, Title V and Section 112) Phase II 8-hour Ozone Implementation PM2.5 Implementation Tribal NSR Rule Appendix S Remand on Reasonable Possibility

Permitting Litigation and Related Activities Newmont Mining Reconsideration (Fugitive Emissions) D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals (Effective date of PCP decision) Decision on appeal of 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Duke Decision Ozone Implementation Phase I D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals - Equipment Replacement Provision