RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAS 19 vs. FAS158, 132R, 87, etc. versus. The scope is broad and includes wages, vacation or holiday pay, bonus, termination benefits, etc. as well as.
Advertisements

Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
Ohio University January 27,  OPERS has a long history of proactively addressing issues as early as possible (examples include the Choices Health.
March 26, 2010 Althea A. Schwartz, FSA Consulting Actuary Milliman Inc. Managing DB Pension Plans in Stressful Times.
Cal PERS Basics and Pension Reform Cities Association of Santa Clara County May 12, 2011.
1 Actuarial Equivalency Factor Rule Accrued Benefit Policy Discussion January 14, 2003.
Pensions ACCTG 5120 David Plumlee.
ORP Contribution Concepts IFS-Sponsored Presentation Denise Yunker, Benefits Director Human Resources Division, OUS
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
 Daimler Benz in 1993 under German GAAP reported a profit of 168 million DM but under US GAAP for the same period, the company reported a loss of almost.
Illinois SURS Member Guide –Contributions (page 2) –Disability Benefits (pages 7-9) –Disability Retirement Allowance (page 10) –Retirement Benefits (pages.
M Forum Plenary Session McGill University Pension Plan October 5,
Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Health Professionals 356 Smith Street, Providence, RI Phone: Fax: www.rifthp.org.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Retirement Plan Annual Valuation Board of Curators January 31, 2013.
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Report on State Actuarial Valuation Joint Hearing Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security Committee Senate Public Employment and Retirement.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
1 Statewide Retirement Systems Funding Updates Presentation to the Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement Dave Bergstrom, MSRS Executive Director.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
ARIZONA CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION WINTER CONFERENCE PRESENTATION FEBRUARY 5, 2014 JAMES C. BACON, JR. TOWN MANAGER.
1 Interpreting Actuarial Information Fritzie Archuleta, ASA MAAA Senior Pension Actuary, CalPERS February 21, 2013.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
CALPERS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS City Council Workshop July 13, 2005.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
IPERS Update SAI Annual Conference August 3, 2011.
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
1 EMS/Fire Department Consolidation Treatment of Pension and Service Under the Police/Fire, CSRS, and 401(a) Plans.
SHARED RISK PLAN FOR ACADEMIC EMPLOYEES OF UNB (AESRP) Pre-Retirement Seminar UNB Human Resources & Organizational Development.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 FCERA Benefits and Reserves January 11, 2006 P.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
Illinois Pension Crisis By: Kaitlyn O’Shea, Connor Francesca, Nealkanth Patel, Darshan Kamdar.
Regional Transportation District Salaried Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Plan Presented by: Terry Bright January 13, 2015  Foster City, CA  Denver,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
Financial Fiduciaries, LLC
Pension Reform Effective Date July 1, 2017.
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
CHAPTER 17 Pensions 2.
League of AZ Cities and Towns PSPRS Pension Task Force August 15, 2014
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
History July 1, 1968 – Establishment of Trust Territory Social Security Administration July 1, 1974 – Establishment of disability program February 8,
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Pre-Retirement Seminar March 23, 2018
Other Post Employment Benefits
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Actuarial Information / Valuations 101
Beth Wright Managing Director
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
HRM Pension Plan Town Hall Information Sessions
Teachers’ Pension Scheme
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
William B. Fornia, FSA April 11, 2019
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
Insurance and Pension Fund Operations
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
City of Palos Verdes Estates Pension Overview
Presentation transcript:

RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2015  

January 1, 2015 Valuation Highlights (the plan is in funding peril) Contributions are not sufficient to fund the liabilities The amount of insufficiency has improved Total actuarial requirement is 25.21% (prior year was 27.14%) ; 18.0% scheduled for receipt in 2015 The contribution deficiency decreased, from 11.14% of payroll to 7.21% Fund is projected to be fully depleted by 2040; last year was 2036 and the prior year was 2032 Assuming 6% earnings the depletion date is 2035; at 8% there is no depletion date in the 30 year projection period Actuarial Accrued Liability increased by $1.0 million From $426.3 million to $427.3 million Actuarial Value of Assets returned 7.36%, exceeding the assumed 7.0% Increased by $4.6 million, from $207.4 million to $212.0 million Market value increased from $213.0 million to $214.5 million

January 1, 2015 Valuation Highlights (the plan is in funding peril) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability decreased by $3.5M From $218.8M to $215.3 million This decreased the actuarially determined contribution

January 1, 2015 Valuation Highlights The normal cost decreased from 11.81% of pay (including admin expenses) to 10.79% The scheduled contribution is 18% of pay Actuarially determined contribution (ADC) decreased by 1.93% of pay Decrease due to investment gains, salary increases less than expected and retirements fewer than expected (with that related assumption change) ADC will keep increasing as the actuarially determined contributions are “missed” Funded ratio increased from 48.7% funded on an actuarial basis to 49.6% Total active participant count increased by 106 From 1,581 to 1,687 New hires will continue to “bend down” the normal cost, so more funding can go to the unfunded accrued liability

History of the Funded Ratio Valuation Date- January 1, Funded Ratio 2002 106.39% 2003 82.96 2004 91.09 2005 91.73 2006 89.06 2007 87.07 2008 86.03 2009 72.57 2010 73.08 2011 68.67 2012 52.24 2013 47.52 2014 48.66 2015 49.61

The scheduled contribution amount was insufficient, starting in 2003 Plan Year Ended December 31, Percentage of ARC contributed 2002 102.2% 2003 53.7 2004 60.9 2005 75.3 2006 64.2 2007 64.6 2008 67.8 2009 44.5 2010 59.0 2011 47.3 2012 33.5 2013 46.2 2014 57.4 2015 --

Long-Term Funding-Reforms to improve the plan Total ARC is 25.21% of payroll compared to the total scheduled contribution rate of 18.00% of payroll. Amendment #22 was adopted in 2010 with the following changes in effect for participants hired on or after January 1, 2011 (Tier 2): New benefit schedule listed in Section 6.01 of the Plan provisions Vesting is changed from 5 years to 10 years The benefit multiplier is changed from 2.5% to 1.0% Unreduced retirement is changed from age 55 with 20 years of service to age 60 with 20 years of service Early retirement reduction is changed from 5.0% from age 55 to 2.5% from age 60 The maximum service included in the benefit calculation is reduced from 30 years to 25 years Sick and vacation payouts are no longer included in the pension benefit calculation Interest on employee contributions is changed from 5% to 3% Due to amendment #22, a drop in the normal cost rate is expected as new hires enter the plan. The normal cost last year was 11.81% and this year it is 10.79%

Long-Term Funding-Reforms to improve the plan On February 27, 2013, a tentative agreement was reached with the following schedule for contributions: Agreement also included specific short-term salary increases (less than 3% per year) Year RTD Members Total 2013 12% 4% 16% 2014 2015 13% 5% 18% 2016 2017

Long-Term Funding Considerations If all actuarial assumptions are met each year, including a net investment return of 7.0% per year, and annual contributions equal those stated in the tentative agreement: Assets will be fully depleted by 2040 Members are not retiring as quickly as assumed Based on a five year history, 745 members were expected to elect normal (non reduced) retirement and 185 were expected to elect early retirement. 194 elected normal retirement and 40 elected early retirement The retirement probabilities have been changed to reflect this slow down in retirement

RTD/ATU Summary There are positive signs that the pension reforms are working Decrease in the normal cost rate Decrease in the actuarially determined contribution Improvement in the funded ratio Gained four more years in the future depletion date (have gained 8 years in the past two years) But the plan is “not out of the woods yet”. Projections (based on an assumed 7% return) still show depletion in 2040 This is a highly volatile calculation; one year of poor returns could bring that number much closer to today