Context Aware Reuse of Learning Resources Franz Weitl, Burkhard Freitag, Rudolf Kammerl, Monica Göstl University of Passau.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
The Project MuSIK Telematics-supported Informatics Education Enschede, 28 January 2000 Peter Gorny Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Fachbereich.
Chapter 1: The Database Environment
Chapter 7 System Models.
Requirements Engineering Process
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Improving Human-Semantic Web Interaction: The Rhizomer Experience Roberto García and Rosa Gil GRIHO - Human Computer Interaction Research Group Universitat.
Science Subject Leader Training
1 of 18 Information Dissemination New Digital Opportunities IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Dissemination New Digital Opportunities.
Relational Database and Data Modeling
18 Copyright © 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved. Distributing Modular Applications: Introduction to Web Services.
1 EUROPEAN STEEL COMPANIES–UNIVERSITIES JOINT CONFERENCE Warsaw April 2007 e-learning in steel production –general concepts and application examples.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 What Is The Next Step? - A review of the alignment results Liru Zhang, Katia Forêt & Darlene Bolig Delaware Department of Education 2004 CCSSO Large-Scale.
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
1 Term 2, 2004, Lecture 9, Distributed DatabasesMarian Ursu, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths College Distributed databases 3.
Making the System Operational
Copyright 2006 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. MarcOnt Initiative Tools for collaborative ontology development.
Raising Achievement. 2 Aims To explore approaches and materials to support the planning of learning. To consider strategies for preparing learners for.
Company LOGO Towards the Validation of Adaptive Educational Hypermedia using CAVIAr Mark Melia & Claus Pahl Dublin City University.
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Week 2 The Object-Oriented Approach to Requirements
Chapter 2 Instructional Systems Presented By: Presented By: Shelly Romack Shelly Romack Instructional Technology and Media for Learning Smaldino, Russell,
Configuration management
Software change management
WEB- BASED TRAINING Chapter 4 Virginija Limanauskiene, KTU, Lithuania.
OOAD – Dr. A. Alghamdi Mastering Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with UML Module 3: Requirements Overview Module 3 - Requirements Overview.
1 Mobile Applications and Web Services Part II Prof. Klaus Moessner, Dr Payam Barnaghi Centre for Communication Systems Research Electronic Engineering.
ABC Technology Project
Ontology-based User Modeling for Web-based Information Systems Anton Andrejko, Michal Barla and Mária Bieliková {andrejko, barla,
TU e technische universiteit eindhoven / department of mathematics and computer science 1 Empirical Evaluation of Learning Styles Adaptation Language Natalia.
TU/e eindhoven university of technology PACIS'03 July Engineering Semantic Web Information Systems Richard Vdovjak Flavius Frasincar Geert-Jan Houben.
VOORBLAD.
A Process to Identify the Enduring Skills, Processes, & Concepts for your Content Area 1.
The 20th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE2008) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lecture 6: Software Design (Part I)
April 2003 ONLINE SERVICE DELIVERY Presentation. 2 What is Online Service Delivery? Vision The current vision of the Online Service Delivery program is.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
1 K. C. Lo / L. M. Chow Power Systems Business Group CLP Power Knowledge Management in CLP Power Oct 2004.
25 seconds left…...
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
James A. Senn’s Information Technology, 3rd Edition
PSSA Preparation.
Chapter 11 Creating Framed Layouts Principles of Web Design, 4 th Edition.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
Organization Theory and Health Services Management
Chapter 13 The Data Warehouse
Modeling Main issues: What do we want to build How do we write this down.
1 Distributed Agents for User-Friendly Access of Digital Libraries DAFFODIL Effective Support for Using Digital Libraries Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen,
From Model-based to Model-driven Design of User Interfaces.
© Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
AICC Meeting – Minneapolis, MN June 24, 2003 Benefits of Reusable Objects – Design/Development Flexibility Design for Multiple Contexts Smallest Media.
Presentation transcript:

Context Aware Reuse of Learning Resources Franz Weitl, Burkhard Freitag, Rudolf Kammerl, Monica Göstl University of Passau

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 2 Outline of the Talk Reuse of learning content is not a straight forward process. Problem: Context Dependency –What is the context of a learning resource? –In which aspects is learning content context dependent? –Can context dependency be avoided? –How does context dependency affect reuse? –Can we support the reuse of contexualized learning content? In the sequel: –analysis of the problem –not: answers to the questions

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 3 Background: WWR- Project National joint project (12 Universities) founded by the bmbf Goal: Pool of 144 online teaching/learning modules in computer engineering Duration: April 2001 – April 2004 Example

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 4 Focus Scalable Documents (intensity, target group, medium) 18 variants per module module.xml var1.xml var18.xml filter.xsl output.xsl var1.html var18.html intensity=basic target =teacher medium=online

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 5 Challenges Implementation of variable learning content is easy (conditional fragments). But: Design of variable learning content? –What about referential consistency? content cohesion –What about didactic consistency? learning dependencies Maintenance: if I change fragment X –which configurations will be affected and does the change make sense in all of them? –which other fragments do I need to change to maintain consistency? Context dependencies cause problems in dynamically assembled content.

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 6 Reusable learning content – learning object approach Goal: small independently usable chunks of learning content, which can be flexibly combined to larger courses.

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 7 Reuse Process of Learning Objects LO Repository Retrieval LO Selection LO Aggregation LO Course

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 8 Design of Learning Objects Design for reusability Decontextualization –Modularity: avoidance of interdependencies across different LOs –Generality: LOs not too specifically designed for a certain pedagogic context.

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 9 Design of Learning Objects Course LO Repository global objectives decontextu- alization metadata tagging

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 10 Design of Learning Objects Course LO Repository decontextu- alization metadata tagging local objectives

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 11 The Reuse Paradox Reusabilty vs. Contextualization There has been much debate about whether instruction can be designed with multiple contexts or environments in mind......the SCORM introduces a reusability paradox: the most reusable objects are context-independent, while the best instruction is highly contextualized [The SCORM Implementation Guide: A Step-by-Step Approach]

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 12

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 13 The Problem Design for reusability ( context independency) can affect the instructional quality of the learning content. Can we support reuse of highly contextualized learning content? –What does highly contextualized mean exactly? –How do context dependencies affect reuse? –What can we do about it?

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 14

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 15 x + yior a + bj ? C or ? 180° or ?

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 16

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 17 Problem Analysis: Definition of Context The context of something consists of the ideas, situations, events, or information that relate to it and make it possible to understand it fully. [Collins Cobuild Dictionary] Context of a fragment of a learning document consists of the objects which influence its pedagogic effect. –The internal context of a fragment consists of the content of the document the fragment is placed in. –The external context of a fragment consists of the properties of the environment the fragment is accessed in. A Doc A Env E access external contextinternal context

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 18 Aspects of Contextualization Interconnection (cognitivism [Ausubel68]) –topics of the content: logical relationships of subject matter entities –learning steps: activation of previously learnt knowledge, motivation of future learning steps, embedding of detail into the context (problem, objective). Specialization (situated learning [Brown et. al 1989]) –target groups: preknowledge, motivation, goals, current tasks, experience, learning styles,... –learning/teaching setting: course type, teaching styles, available staff, rooms, technical environment (learning platform, browser features), examination regulations,... –authoring environment: preferences, styles and skills of authors, conventions for notation and terminology, authoring tools, resources (personnel, time, budget) Problem: many dimensions of contextualization!

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 19 External Contexts of Learning Content fragment authoring context application context learning context fragment course content Acourse content B instantiation instance Ainstance B individual instance A course Acourse B curriculum X individual instance B curriculum Y execution reuse Author Teacher Learner

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 20 Authoring Context: Abstract Model context authoring context application context contentauthors authoring environment internal context intends conventions & criteria leads to external context fragment meets refers to

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 21 Problem: Context Dependency What is context? In which aspects is learning content context dependent? Can context dependency be avoided? How does context dependency affect reuse? Can we support the reuse of contexualized learning content?

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 22 Reuse Process of Contextualized Learning Content F Repository FFF 1. select2. de-contextualize 3a specialize3b integrate Source ContextTarget Context 3. re-contextualize 4. retain transformation phase

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 23 Reuse Process of Contextualized Learning Content

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 24 Implications on Reuse Support Systems 1. Retrieval in context: –Current authoring context should be taken into account when querying a repository compatibility of contexts –Retrieval results should be presented in tandem with their previous use contexts 2. Decontextualization on demand: –Identification and Classification of context dependent content –Evaluation of dependencies between fragments of learning content F Repository FFF 1. select2. de-contextualize 3a specialize3b integrate Source ContextTarget Context 3. re-contextualize 4. retain

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 25 Implications on Reuse Support Systems 3. Recontextualization: Adaptation and Integration –Recognition of unsatisfied external context dependencies –Automatic adaptation and interconnection 4. Repository: Change management –Management of variants –Propagation and integration of changes –Copyright management F Repository FFF 1. select2. de-contextualize 3a specialize3b integrate Source ContextTarget Context 3. re-contextualize 4. retain

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 26 Our Research Focus: Recognition of Unsatisfied Context Dependencies Are there dangling semantic references within the document? Specification and verification of semantic references within a learning document Does the document as a whole (still) meet the conventions and criteria of the authoring context? Specification and verification of structural didactic properties of a learning document After integration of a fragment into a new document: A Doc B A Doc A Source Context conventions & criteria A Target Context conventions & criteria B ? ?

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 27 Methods and Conceptual Framework Representation of knowledge about the content –topics and their relationships –didactic structure of the content Metadata-Indexing and Ontologies (RDF + OWL) Specification and verification of semantic references Description Logics and DL-based Reasoning Specification and verification of properties of the didactic structure: ???

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 28 Context Aware Resource of Learning Resources - Summary What is context? –internal / external In which aspects is learning content context dependent? –interconnection / specilization Can context dependency be avoided? –pedagogic requirement How does context dependency affect reuse? –de- and recontextualization processes Can we support reuse of contexualized learning content? –??? Required: –Theory of context in e-Learning –Empirical research of reuse processes Technical challenges: –Models of context and contextualized content –Formalisms to represent and reason about (certain) context dependencies –Handling of incompleteness and fuzziness –Handling of changes and variants –Practicability: overhead vs. benefit

, © 2004 Lehrstuhl für Informationsmanagement, Universität Passau 29 Further Information Franz Weitl, Rudolf Kammerl, Monica Göstl: Context aware Reuse of Learning Resources. In: Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland,