John Rawls Ronald Dworkin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Justice.
An Egalitarian Law of Peoples Thomas Pogge
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
EM Winter Read for Friday  Chapter  Cases Eminent Domain Battling Over Bottled Water  Articles Isbister: Income distribution Maxwell:
Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
A Capitalist Conception of Justice
Chapter 4 Ethics in International Business McGraw-Hill/Irwin Global Business Today, 4/e © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Answering the Three Economic Questions
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
What is a Just Society? What is Justice?.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Ten Principles of Economics
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Chapter 11 Freedom in a Political and Cultural Context.
Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Limited Productive Resources and Unlimited Wants Preparing to Teach HS Economics 2014.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
Ideas about Justice Three big themes Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC A Practical Approach For Decision Makers SECOND EDITION EILEEN E. MORRISON.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
Consenting Adults Reading By Robert Pollock. Moral Equivalency? American academia and media were rife with the notion that the United States and the Soviet.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
The System of Social Justice Principles in the Contemporary Law Tradition of the West dr. Jolanta Bieliauskaitė Brno, 2015.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
University of Papua New Guinea Guest Lecture Lecture: Philosophy of Economics.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Philosophy 219 Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Political theory and law
Marxism PSIR308.
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
John Rawls’ theory of justice
TEN PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Three Dimensions of Justice
MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.
Chapter 5 Ethical Decision Making
Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.
ECONOMIC DECISIONS Unit 1, part one
Minimal State The regime advocated by libertarians, allows unrestricted laissez-faire capitalism. Such a political system would allow huge social inequalities.
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
Ten Principles of Economics
Socialism vs. Capitalism
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Presentation transcript:

John Rawls Ronald Dworkin People make decisions based on a veil of ignorance, they will not know what position they are hold until after the veil is lifted. People will choose the difference principle which allows inequalities to exist but, only if they benefit the least advantaged person. Ronald Dworkin Here the use of an envy-test is applied. Dworkin thought after the veil is lifted people would be envious of what others had. Therefore, everyone is given equal amounts of money to purchase the goods they most want. This system is based on everyone having the same abilities and capacities, however since this is not the case, there is insurance to supplement the “auction” for people with some disadvantage.

Right Libertarianism The only morally justified regime is unlimited laissez-farie capitalism. Left Libertarianism Meritocracy as the best political regime. Natural resources should be divided equally to all members of a society. Inheritance is strictly limited.

Utilitarianism Seeks to obtain the maximum amount of happiness for the society as a whole. Distribution of goods occurs only when in has some impact on maximization of overall happiness. Pluralism Resources should be allocated based on ability. However, no one person would benefit from all spheres i.e., economic, political, judicial, etc… Strict Egalitarian All members of a society should have exactly equal amounts or resources