PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
Advertisements

Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) Internal quality assurance.
Executive Director of the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Regional Meeting of Ministers of Education on the Implementation of the European Higher Education Area 17 – 18 October 2013 Yerevan Overview of the student.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Improving Institutional Quality in Europe: The role of the European University Association Kate Geddie, EUA Brussels Tor Vergata, 27 November 2003.
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
Doctoral education through students’ eyes Juuso Leivonen The 21st century doctorate – sharing European developments Scotland House Conference.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
Higher Education and Research Council of Europe September 2006.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
The Governance and Management of European Universities – Future Trends Thomas Estermann Senior Programme Manager European University Association Targu.
Glasgow, 17 May 2012 Mike Coles Developments in the validation of learning in the EU.
WORKSHOP 6: Quality Assurance after Bergen: Implementing the European Standards Contributions from Quality Assurance Networks Francisco Marcellán Director.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
Plurilingualism in Higher Education – Opportunities and Challenges Waldemar Martyniuk Language Policy Division Council of Europe Strasbourg, France.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
QUALITY, ICTs AND « LICENCE-MASTER- DOCTORATE »(LMD) REFORMS Juma SHABANI Abuja, September 22nd, 2015.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
REFORMING HIGHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE – CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND Sjur Bergan Head, Dept. of Higher Education and History Teaching Council of Europe.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE nd UNICA EduLab Budapest, 3rd December, 2015 Taina Moisander Bologna With Student Eyes 2015.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto Vice-President, ENQA Ljubljana, 20 October 2009.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Tonka Krešić, mag. iur. BY BOLOGNA 1. Sarajevo 2. Banja Luka 3. Mostar 4. Bihać 5. Istočno Sarajevo 6.DŽ. B. Mostar 7. Zenica 8. Tuzla.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
HIGHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE – AN OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS Sjur Bergan Head, Dept. of Higher Education and History Teaching Council of Europe.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Adam Gajek European Students’ Union The ESG – students in focus.
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
RE:LOD ISRAEL National Union of Israeli Students
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
The Role of Students in the QA System in Kazakhstan: IAAR Experience
TOWARDS THE YEREVAN 2015 MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE: A NEW AGENDA FOR THE EHEA Hayk Sargsyan 11 March 2015 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Recognition of prior learning: report
Promoting an Internal Quality Culture in Mozambican Universities
HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN EUROPE – AN OVERVIEW
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
OECD - Introduction It is an organisation of those countries which describe themselves as Democratic and have Market economy. Its HQ is in Paris, France.
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
Local Self-Governance in Europe
Quality Assurances System. Where we came from and where we are now
HERE report 2015 – good practices and recommendations
Recognition of prior learning: report
Introduction of ENQA Art of self-reflection for constant enhancement: the purpose and objectives of the review Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
27 November 2014 Mantas Sekmokas
Introduction to the training
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Boosting Social Enterprises in Europe December 3-4, 2015
Involving students to promote employability of higher education
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
THE ETF – HELPING countries develop through learning
Towards a European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning
Cooperation between the Asia-Pacific and the Lisbon Recognition Convention regions re recognition of TNQ Asia-Pacific Forum in Quality and Recognition.
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Thinking and acting globally The role of recognition, quality assurance and qualifications frameworks for student and talent mobility: challenges and opportunities.
External review of QA agencies: the role of the students
Thinking and acting globally The role of recognition, quality assurance and qualifications frameworks for student and talent mobility: challenges and opportunities.
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR COUNCIL OF EUROPE Directorate of School, Out-Of-School And Higher Education, Higher Education and Research Division and PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR MAKING THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA A REALITY: THE ROLE OF STUDENTS

Making Higher Education Area a Reality: Role of Student Organizations by Tatsiana Khoma ESIB – the National Unions of Students in Europe Moscow, November 2-3, 2006

ESIB – the National Unions of Students in Europe 45 member National Unions of Students from 34 countries in Europe Representing more than 10 mln European Students Was founded in 1982 to promote the educational, economic, cultural, social and political interests of students in Europe www.esib.org

Role of Student Organizations Role of students and student organizations; Areas of student interest; Areas of ESIB concern; Criteria for student organizations; Conclusions. Outlines of the topics to be touched during the speech

Role of Students Students are... biggest stakeholder in higher education center of the learning process: no students – no universities Factor of innovation, growth and development Investment of the society its the future promoters of active citizenship, equality, democracy and the rule of law

European Students Rights Charter – Student Involvement ... the right to organize themselves freely in legally recognized entities... ... right to participate in all decision-making bodies and for a relevant to their education... ... the right to be informed about all higher education affairs in a transparent manner... ... the right to have their opinion considered as that of an equal stakeholder in higher education... ... right to freely express themselves and this should not be limited to academic matters... ... the right to participate as equal partners in continual assessment We had our seminar on students rights in Serbia this spring where we discussed the rights of students in different spheres. The outcomes pretty much explain how european see their own role in the process and what they want and can do. Lets focus on the point of student involvement over here as a part of a document on wich ESIB has been working since then.

Student organizations are... ... the point of reference for student interests for non-student actors in student related issue ... central actor in a round-table on everything related to students

Areas of interest Students' rights Governance in Higher Education Students' well-being Quality assurance Students' mobility Equality within higher education Reforms of HE and processes bringing changes (BP, LP, etc.) Etc...

Students' Rights Overarching issue Making students' rights legal at both national and European level European Students' Rights Charter Draft document can be found at www.esib.org

Students Well-being Reaching optimal study conditions for all students; Is an issue of mutual interest for students and the society; One of the central focus for student organizations at all level.

Governance and decision-making “Efficiency in governance structures might be a useful goal, but efficiency must never mean that students, teachers and staff are being excluded in favour of corporate steering models for universities and polytechnics. Furthermore, the autonomy of institutions should be designed in a way that gives a collective responsibility to all stakeholders of the higher education community, not by transferring all decision-making powers to the university leadership.”

Governance and decision-making Lack of legal regulations for actual student involvement, not only consultative roles; Lack of student involvement in formal bodies that prepare decisions; Students are not or less involved in topics related to finances, hiring of staff, follow up of evaluation results, issues related to study environment, etc.; Mentality of other stakeholders who are not used or willing to consider students as equal partners but rather as mere users whose opinions hardly count; Unwillingness of governments and/or HEIs to value the opinion of students if they are different from their own; Lack of financial and human resources of student unions and representatives.

Quality Assurance Students demands to quality... ... study programs that are flexible in their organization and possibilities of individual choices ... properly working instruments allowing for full recognition of their qualifications and competences ... study programs being meaningful QA has become one of the priority topics for the discussions in HE arena. Students have a very big interest in high quality Higher education. And students are able to substantially contribute within QA. There are numerous issues which can be best identified and analysed by those who face the reality every day. ESIB sees main challenges for QA to be: 1. Involvement of the stakeholders, particularly students, is not ensured in all countries on all levels. 2. Not all higher education institutions have in place well-defined and transparent procedures of Internal Quality Assurance. 3. An independent agency carrying out QA is still lacking in many Bologna signatory countries. The involvement of students and other stakeholders is maybe the most critical point of those three. For a successful system of QA, student involvement is a must. But let's see the picture... the picture of Bologna With Student Eyes, 2005. The four levels mentioned are - students in decision-making body of national QA agency - students in external peer review groups - local students consulted by external peers - students in internal QA measures.

Student participation in QA: Bologna with student eyes, 2005

Criteria for student organizations be open to all students; democratic in their structure and in their principles; run by students; independent and accountable to students they represent.

Conclusions Role of student organizations as student representatives is crucial; More transparency and inclusion of students into decision-making and quality assurance is needed; Idea of partnership between all stakeholders is a key to success; Student organizations should be supported and not prohibited from their activity.

Thank you for your attention!