Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Advertisements

ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Shifting the Position of Focal Point of Proton Beam Relative to Intersection Point with Fixed Emittance for IDS120h Configuration X. Ding, UCLA Target.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Primary beam production: progress - Extraction from LSS2 - Switching from TT20 at 100 GeV B.Goddard F.Velotti, A.Parfenova, R.Steerenberg, K.Cornelis,
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB-PS TRANSFER AT 2 GEV - CONCEPTS AND OPTICS W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira et al. ABT LIU Review, 20-Nov-15.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
Beam Optics of the TTF2 Nina Golubeva DESY. Beam optics from the BC2 up to the undulators General introduction to linear optics: – constraints for different.
1 RTML Emittance Measurement Station Yuri Kubyshin (1), Robert Apsimon (2), Hector García (1,2) (1) Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) (2) CERN CLIC.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
PS2 Orbit Correction - Update Wolfgang Bartmann PS2 Meeting, 26 th March Mar-091PS2 Orbit Correction - Update.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Extraction and beam delivery
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Acknowledgements and credits to: W. Herr, B. Holzer, A. Streun, A
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
Design a top‐up injection System for a light source
TT20 MD for the NA61/SHINE fragmented beam experiment
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Transfer Line for EIC.
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Booster to Ion Ring Transfer Line
Presentation transcript:

Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS Christoph Hessler TT20 for BDF Meeting 06/03/2017

Assumed Beam Parameters Value Energy (GeV) 400 Norm. horizontal emittance (μm) 14.9 Norm. vertical emittance (μm) 14.2 Phys. horizontal emittance (m) 3.503619e-08 Phys. vertical emittance (m) 3.335715e-08 Beta_x (m) 31.468311 Beta_y (m) 137.60468 Alpha_x -1.533736 Alpha_y -3.738247 Mu_x 0.47825 Mu_y 0.33557 D_x -0.2291 DP_x 0.01359 D_y 0.289 DP_y 0.00348 From tracking simulations From official optics 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Present Optics for TT20 2016 optics for TT20 (T2) as found on /afs/cern.ch/eng/ps/cps/TransLines/TT20/2016 Beta function for other targets even higher. → Are these optics really used in practice? 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Preliminary Beam Line Design (I) Preliminary beam line design by Brennan Goddard and Matthew Fraser: 17 new MBBs, 5 new quadrupoles Dispersion suppression scheme 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Beam Optics (I) Beam matched to 10 mm sigma at the target Dispersion well suppressed 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Aperture (I) But: Partially only 2 sigma aperture! 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Preliminary Beam Line Design (II) 5 new MBBs, 18 new MBNs, 6 new quadrupoles. Beam from SPS matched to the FODO structure of the beam line. Beam matched to the FODO structure of the new part of the line. Beam not yet matched to the target Dispersion not yet suppressed at target. Work in progress 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Aperture (II) Now there are some problems in the existing part of the line, but not as severe. More optimization needed. 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Aperture studies for splitting magnet Based on Matthew’s preliminary beam line design Beam envelope (6 sigma) and the position of the beam deflected by 8.2 mrad in total calculated in the enlarged MSSB. Error distributions for quadrupole alignment errors, main dipole field and tilt errors and injection errors added and beam coordinates for 1000 random values of these error distributions calculated. In the attached pictures you can see the cross section at the start of the 1st splitter magnet, after each splitter magnet and after BTV.211743 . Each trajectory shows a red spot (not really visible) surrounded by an ellipse defining the 6 sigma beam radius. The green spot and ellipse is the non-deflected beam. The beam direction is out of the plane. By averaging over all trajectories I got the following values for the transverse position of the beam centre: 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Aperture studies for splitting magnet <x>= 0.08 mm <x>= 6.51 mm <x>= 28.11 mm <x>= 64.88 mm <x>= 83.46 mm 06 March 2017 C. Hessler

Next Steps Survey matching to the good target position → Where is it? CCS coordinates? Using good beam parameters. Match beam to the target Dispersion suppression. Get aperture problem fixed. Add dilution kickers. → Which magnet type? Proposal MPLH/MPLV. 06 March 2017 C. Hessler