Sound Source Verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NNMREC Estimating the Acoustic Impact of a Tidal Energy Project Chris Bassett, Jim Thomson, and Brian Polagye University of Washington Mechanical Engineering.
Advertisements

RADAR: An In-Building RF-based User Location and Tracking System.
CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS 2. Radio Wave Propagation.
Model-based Estimation of Noise Impact Zones for Deep Offshore Seismic Surveys Alexander MacGillivray, Marie-Noël R. Matthews JASCO Applied Sciences,
Tsunamis Detection The Mission  Tsunamis Detection can help to minimize loss of life and property from future tsunamis. Mission Introduction Mechanism.
Development of Improved Noise Metrics and Auditory Risk Assessment Procedure June 22, 2009 Won Joon Song and Jay Kim Mechanical Engineering Department.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
Listening to the Sound: Ambient Noise in Admiralty Inlet
Wireless Communication Channels: Large-Scale Pathloss
NNMREC November 4, 2010 Passive Acoustics New Environmental Technologies Renewable Ocean Energy and the Marine Environment Brian Polagye, Chris Bassett,
Anthropogenic Noise from Offshore Wind Farm Construction Background A key element of the UK plan for the delivery of renewable energy.
CEMTREX, INC. MODCON SYSTEMS LTD NIR Systems July 2010.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
NNMREC April 20, 2011 Ambient Noise in Admiralty Inlet Chris Bassett, Brian Polagye, and Jim Thomson University of Washington Northwest National Marine.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Acoustic Effects of Hydrokinetic Tidal Turbines Dr. Brian Polagye University.
A method whereby, in contrast to conventional marine seismic (towed streamer) acquisition, acoustic reflections are recorded by receivers placed on the.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
HOW DO WE STUDY THE SEAFLOOR?. 1. Line-sounding – starting around 85 B.C. lead weighted ropes were dropped over the side of the boat and the depth was.
A review of current debates on noise-mapping Professor Jian Kang 康健 School of Architecture, University of Sheffield United Kingdom 5th UK CARE Annual General.
Hydroacoustics ODOT Hydroacoustic Work Group Agreement on Thresholds Specifications Effects to fish Attenuation Monitoring and Reporting Information needs.
1 Research Question  Can a vision-based mobile robot  with limited computation and memory,  and rapidly varying camera positions,  operate autonomously.
Mapping of FM and HD Radio Coverage Brian Casey, Leandro Franca, and Thomas Shanks March 9, 2009.
Time (s) Angle (degrees) Pump via bottom reflection Pump via surface reflection Pump Drag head Underwater Anthropogenic.
Proposal for RCNDE feasibility study Practical feasibility of distributed guided wave SHM systems Investigators Paul Wilcox, Bruce Drinkwater, Anthony.
NEMO-O DE NEMO First results from the NEMO Test Site G. Riccobene, for the NEMO Collaboration The NEMO Collaboration is performing the Phase 1 of the project,
SIDE SCAN OVERVIEW. Sidescan Survey Overview A sidescan sonar can be used for a wide variety of survey operations. Search and recovery Geological Identification.
Acoustic Telemetry Tagging Hillary Sinnott SCM 330 March 12, 2008 Hillary Sinnott SCM 330 March 12, 2008.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
WP F/L Detection Unit Mechanical Structure and Deployment R. Papaleo 130/03/2011.
Institute of Professional Studies School of Research and Graduate Studies Selecting Samples and Negotiating Access Lecture Eight.
Developing a Sonar Sub-System for a Submarine to Obtain Time Delays between Received Signals Gary Eades Dy Eang Diana Fuertes 12/04/2007 ECE4884 L03 Dr.
E.A.R a quantum leap in leakage management. Leakage: Happens! Is not predicable other than most likely at times of climate changes – wet / dry, hot /
Cosmic Microwave Technology, Inc.
The Basics of Geography Chapters 1 — 4
Conclusions & Recommendations
C1300 advanced circular chart recorder
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Online RadFET reader for beam loss monitoring system
Correlation between underwater noise level and AIS data in the Gulf of Catania (Sicily) Sara Pulvirenti Erice International School.
Topics Introduction Hardware and Software How Computers Store Data
Leakage control in transmission pipelines
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Wave Coupling as Revealed in Swarm Plasma Densities and Drifts Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University.
Supervisor: Dr. Ian Wassell
Robert Lahmann VLVnT – Toulon – 24-April-2008
Unified Modeling Language
How SCADA Systems Work?.
ISO New England System R&D Needs
a critical approach for collecting and analysing data
Containers on Bow.
Factors that Influence the Geometric Detection Pattern of Vehicle-based Licence Plate Recognition Systems Martin Rademeyer Thinus Booysen, Arno Barnard.
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY
MEASURING INDIVIDUALS’ TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR BY USE OF A GPS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION IN DAR ES SALAAM CITY 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference.
Pipe Patrol – Leak detection and localisation system for Water Networks
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Data collection and activity analysis
Cableless seismograph Atom
Progress Works, recommendations and future work programme
OS 72B-0355 Analysis of Acoustic Signals from Ship Traffic at Pioneer Seamount Carl O. Vuosalo,1 Craig Huber,1 Michael D. Hoffman,1 Newell Garfield,2 and.
The Crossley Heath School, Halifax
Department of Electrical Engineering
Games Development Practices Sound Effects
Nanyang Technological University
Applying Use Cases (Chapters 25,26)
Applying Use Cases (Chapters 25,26)
Scalable Bandwidth for Remote Hydrographic Survey Monitoring
Low-Cost, Portable, Pneumonia Diagnostic Device
2.3. Measures of Dispersion (Variation):
NPS Introduction to GIS: Lecture 1 Based on NIMC and Other Sources.
Mosaic artifacts reduction in SIPS Backscatter
Real-time Uncertainty Output for MBES Systems
Presentation transcript:

Sound Source Verification SSV Guillermo Jiménez Rebecca Snyder Brian Heath

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION Sound Field Sound source Environment Impact of Sound SSV Mitigation

SSV SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION What does the sound field look like? How is the sound perceived by the animal? SSV How can we minimise the impact?

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Sound field of seismic surveys: two mapping methods presented. Generate high density SPL map around the source. Estimate mitigation zones using the SPL map either: Directly or Indirectly, to validate or refine a previous sound propagation model Data Collection Data Processing SPL Map Mitigation Zones

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Sound field of seismic surveys: two mapping methods presented. Generate high density SPL map around the source. Estimate mitigation zones using the SPL map either: Directly or Indirectly, to validate or refine a previous sound propagation model Data Collection Data Processing SPL Map Mitigation Zones

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Sound field of seismic surveys: two mapping methods presented. Generate high density SPL map around the source. Estimate mitigation zones using the SPL map either: Directly or Indirectly, to validate or refine a previous sound propagation model Data Collection Data Processing SPL Map Mitigation Zones

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Sound field of seismic surveys: two mapping methods presented. Generate high density SPL map around the source. Estimate mitigation zones using the SPL map either: Directly or Indirectly, to validate or refine a previous sound propagation model Data Collection Data Processing SPL Map Mitigation Zones

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Sound field of seismic surveys: two mapping methods presented. Generate high density SPL map around the source. Estimate mitigation zones using the SPL map either: Directly or Indirectly, to validate or refine a previous sound propagation model Data Collection Data Processing SPL Map Mitigation Zones

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Sound field of seismic surveys: two mapping methods presented. Generate high density SPL map around the source. Estimate mitigation zones using the SPL map either: Directly or Indirectly, to validate or refine a previous sound propagation model Data Collection Data Processing SPL Map Propagation Model SPL Map Mitigation Zones

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION Exclusion Area or Mitigation Zone 190 dB Mitigation Zone The exclusion area is circular for mitigation purposes. The actual area delimited by the threshold level might not be circular.

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION 190 dB Mitigation Zone The exclusion area is circular for mitigation purposes. The actual area delimited by the threshold level might not be circular.

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION 190 dB Mitigation Zone

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION 190 dB Mitigation Zone 180 dB Mitigation Zone

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION 190 dB Mitigation Zone 180 dB Mitigation Zone 160 dB Mitigation Zone High Threshold Levels Smaller mitigation zones Prevent auditory injury Low Threshold Levels Larger mitigation zones Prevent behavioural impact

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION The sea is a complex acoustic environment The sound field depends on the source, bathymetry, water properties and seabed geology. The environment characteristics vary in space and time. A good SSV approach must: Account for the dynamic nature of the underwater environment. Define a exclusion area (mitigation zone) for each distinct situation

SOUND FIELD MAPPING METHODS DATA COLLECTION SOUND FIELD MAPPING METHODS Deployment: drift buoys or towed hydrophones Source: impulsive source towed by seismic vessel Receiver: electronics + acquisition software + GPS + hydrophones Data collected Acoustic signal: PCM 16-bit, 2 channels, 88.2 kS/s to 500 kS/s Position of receiver: GPS and AIS Position of source: AIS and P190/SPS Log report: deployment/retrieval times, source status, etc

DATA COLLECTION DRIFT BUOY DEPLOYMENT Direction of Currents Drifting Buoys Source Vessel Direction of Currents Impulsive Source

DRIFT BUOY DESCRIPTION DATA COLLECTION DRIFT BUOY DESCRIPTION LED beacon: visual localisation Radar reflector: RF localisation Data acquisition unit: electronics, power supply, GPS, satellite tracker Float Hydrophones: pole-mounted, distinct gains (pre-selected)

DRIFTING BUOY DEPLOYMENT ― HIGHLIGHTS DATA COLLECTION DRIFTING BUOY DEPLOYMENT ― HIGHLIGHTS Portable buoys: easy transport, fast and simple assembly The buoys are light (~40 kg) ― 2 person team only Typical operations: < 8 h (30 min deployment, 6 h drift, 30 min retrieval) Data retrieval after each individual deployment A buoy can cover up to 25 km in fast currents Recorded shots per deployment: > 12,000 (10 s shot rate, 6 buoys ) Field projects included North Pacific and the Arctic Less flow noise – Particularly effective in fast currents

TOWED HYDROPHONE DEPLOYMENT DATA COLLECTION TOWED HYDROPHONE DEPLOYMENT Source Vessel Support Vessel Impulsive Source Hydrophone Array Support vessel: no predefined path Source vessel: survey lines

TOWED HYDROPHONE DESCRIPTION DATA COLLECTION TOWED HYDROPHONE DESCRIPTION GPS: placed in a high point on ship Interface: display + keyboard Data acquisition box: acoustics + GPS PC Deck cable Hydrophones: various gains Tow cable (all lengths supplied)

TOWED HYDROPHONE DEPLOYMENT ― HIGHLIGHTS DATA COLLECTION TOWED HYDROPHONE DEPLOYMENT ― HIGHLIGHTS Acquisition box and cable: compact system, easy installation Data acquisition: switch on before survey, switch off after survey Typical operations: weeks to months Data retrieved after crew rotation (few weeks) Covers the entire survey area Recorded shots per day: > 4,000 (10 s shot rate, 12 h deployment) Field trials in the North Sea and North Atlantic Requires no additional resources.

DATA PROCESSING SPL Map Acoustic Signal Source Position Vessel Receiver Source Source Position SPL Map Source Receiver Position

DATA PROCESSING SPL Map Acoustic Signal Source Position Vessel Receiver Source Source Position SPL Map Received SPL Source Receiver Position

DATA PROCESSING SPL Map Acoustic Signal Source Position Receiver Position

DATA PROCESSING SPL Map Acoustic Signal Source Position Receiver Position

DATA PROCESSING SPL Map Acoustic Signal Source Position Receiver Position

DATA PROCESSING SPL Map Acoustic Signal Source Position Receiver Position

SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL MAPS SPL MAP FOR DRIFT BUOYS

SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL MAPS SPL MAP FOR DRIFT BUOYS 1 source position Multiple receiver positions Clear image of sound field Long distance and angle coverage Easy to interpret Ideal for model verification Various source positions may be required

SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL MAPS SPL MAP FOR A TOWED HYDROPHONE

SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL MAPS SPL MAP FOR A TOWED HYDROPHONE Multiple source positions Multiple receiver positions Accurate representation of sound field variations Ideal for model refinement May be difficult to interpret Limited distance and angle coverage

DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES MITIGATION ZONES DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 SPLrms [dB re 1µPa] Distance [km]

DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES MITIGATION ZONES DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 SPLrms [dB re 1µPa] Distance [km]

DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES MITIGATION ZONES DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES 4100 m 95th Percentile Curve 90th Percentile Curve 80th Percentile Curve 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 SPLrms [dB re 1µPa] Distance [km]

DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES MITIGATION ZONES DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES 95th Percentile Curve 90th Percentile Curve 80th Percentile Curve 3500 m 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 SPLrms [dB re 1µPa] Distance [km]

DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES MITIGATION ZONES DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES 3200 m 95th Percentile Curve 90th Percentile Curve 80th Percentile Curve 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 SPLrms [dB re 1µPa] Distance [km]

DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES MITIGATION ZONES DIRECT CALCULATION FROM MEASURED SPL VALUES Measured SPL map: shows variability of sound field. Sampling strategy and deployment constraints affect point distributions. Can be extended with validated propagation model.

SOUND SOURCE VERIFICATION SUMMARY Easy deployment, retrieval and implementation Cost effective Very large datasets (thousands of SPL points) Multiple receiver positions Extensively tested (Pacific, Atlantic, Arctic, North Sea) Minimal environmental impact Fast data collection, analysis and reporting (< 24 hours)