ALICE – First paper.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photons and Jets from the first year of ALICE A
Advertisements

HLT Collaboration; High Level Trigger HLT PRR Computer Architecture Volker Lindenstruth Kirchhoff Institute for Physics Chair of Computer.
High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
Dielectron Physics with ALICE Transition Radiation Detector (TRD) Prashant Shukla (for the ALICE TRD Collaboration) Institute of Physics University of.
HLT - data compression vs event rejection. Assumptions Need for an online rudimentary event reconstruction for monitoring Detector readout rate (i.e.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
Level-3 trigger for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Data rate reduction in ALICE. Data volume and event rate TPC detector data volume = 300 Mbyte/event data rate = 200 Hz front-end electronics DAQ – event.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/20 New Experiences with the ALICE High Level Trigger Data Transport.
> IRTG – Heidelberg 2007 < Jochen Thäder – University of Heidelberg 1/18 ALICE HLT in the TPC Commissioning IRTG Seminar Heidelberg – January 2008 Jochen.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
HLT Collaboration (28-Jun-15) 1 High Level Trigger L0 L1 L2 HLT Dieter Roehrich UiB Trigger Accept/reject events Select Select regions of interest within.
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.
Tom Dietel University of Cape Town for the ALICE Collaboration Computing for ALICE at the LHC.
Photon physics in ALICE Y.Kharlov D.Peressounko IHEP RRC “Kurchatov Institute” for the ALICE collaboration and.
The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
Heavy Ions at the LHC Peter G. Jones University of Birmingham, UK NP UK Community Meeting, Cosener’s House, September 2008.
The ALICE DAQ: Current Status and Future Challenges P. VANDE VYVRE CERN-EP/AID.
ALICE Upgrade for Run3: Computing HL-LHC Trigger, Online and Offline Computing Working Group Topical Workshop Sep 5 th 2014.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Heavy flavour capabilities with the ALICE TRD Benjamin Dönigus ISNP 2008 Erice/Sicily.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
EMCal in ALICE Norbert Novitzky 1. Outline How Electro-Magnetic Calorimeters works ? Physics motivation – What can we measure with Emcal ? – Advantages.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
Leo Greiner IPHC beam test Beam tests at the ALS and RHIC with a Mimostar-2 telescope.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
FPGA Co-processor for the ALICE High Level Trigger Gaute Grastveit University of Bergen Norway H.Helstrup 1, J.Lien 1, V.Lindenstruth 2, C.Loizides 5,
Upgrade Letter of Intent High Level Trigger Thorsten Kollegger ALICE | Offline Week |
Pierre VANDE VYVRE ALICE Online upgrade October 03, 2012 Offline Meeting, CERN.
Workshop ALICE Upgrade Overview Thorsten Kollegger for the ALICE Collaboration ALICE | Workshop |
DIS 2011, Newport News, April 2011Joakim Nystrand, University of Bergen 1 Small-x and forward measurements in ALICE Joakim Nystrand University of.
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
Recent Results from ALICE E. Vercellin Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Università di Torino and INFN Torino.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Computing in CBM Volker Friese GSI Darmstadt International Conference on Matter under High Densities 21 – 23 June 2016 Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology,
Use of FPGA for dataflow Filippo Costa ALICE O2 CERN
Evidence for Strongly Interacting Opaque Plasma
evoluzione modello per Run3 LHC
LHC experiments Requirements and Concepts ALICE
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
DAQ Systems and Technologies for Flavor Physics
Emanuele Leonardi PADME General Meeting - LNF January 2017
HLT & Calibration.
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Quarkonium production in ALICE
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
The LHCb Trigger Niko Neufeld CERN, PH.
LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics
Design Principles of the CMS Level-1 Trigger Control and Hardware Monitoring System Ildefons Magrans de Abril Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna.
Jet Measurements with the EMCal of ALICE
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Implementation of DHLT Monitoring Tool for ALICE
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
FIT detector as Luminometer for RUN3
Presentation transcript:

ALICE – First paper

ALICE Set-up TOF TRD HMPID ITS PMD Muon Arm PHOS TPC Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons TOF TRD HMPID ITS PMD Muon Arm PHOS ALICE Set-up TPC

ALICE TPC Large volume gas detector Drift volume and MPWC at the end caps 3-dim. “continuous” tracking device for charged particles x,y of pad z derived from drift time Designed to record up to 20000 tracks Event rate: about 1 kHz Typical event size for a central Pb+Pb collision: about 75 MByte 3

ALICE TPC: 5 years of construction

Trigger system Minimal requirements High level requirements Detect collisions Initialise readout of detectors Initialise data transfer to data acquisition (DAQ) Protection against pile-up High level requirements Select interesting events Needs real-time processing of raw data and extraction of physics observables trigger detector trigger system Detectors Why? interaction rate (e.g. 8 kHz for Pb+Pb) > detector readout rate (e.g. 1 kHz for TPC) > DAQ archiving rate (50 - 100 Hz) Readout electronics raw data high-level trigger trigger DAQ processed data

What to trigger on? trigger Every central Pb+Pb collisions produces a QGP - no need for a QGP-trigger But hard probes are (still) rare at high momentum In addition, the reconstruction efficiency of heavy quark probes is very low E.g. Detection of hadronic charm decays: D0  K– + + about 1 D0 per event (central Pb-Pb) in ALICE acceptance after cuts signal/event = 0.001 background/event = 0.01 trigger

PHOS L0 trigger PbO4W- crystal calorimeter for photons, neutral mesons, 1 to > 100 GeV Array of crystals + APD + preamp + trigger logic + readout DAQ L0 trigger tasks shower finder energy sum implementation FPGA VHDL firmware L0/L1 trigger 8

PHOS – muon tracks

D0 trigger Detection of hadronic charm decays: D0  K– + + (6.75%), c = 124 m HLT code D0 finder: cut on d0(K)*d0() TPC tracker TPC+ITS track fitter displaced decay vertex finder ITS TPC Preliminary result: invariant mass resolution is within a factor of two compared to offline

Introducing the High Level Trigger ALICE data rates (example TPC) TPC is the largest data source with 570132 channels, 512 timebins and 10 bit ADC value. Central Pb+Pb collisions event rates: ~200 Hz (past/future protected) event sizes: ~75 Mbyte (after zero-suppression) data rates: ~ 15 Gbyte/sec TPC data rate alone exceeds by far the total DAQ bandwidth of 1.25 Gbyte/sec HLT tasks Event selection based on software trigger Efficient data compression

HLT requirements Full event reconstruction in real-time Event analysis Main task: reconstruction of up to 10000 charged particle trajectories Method: Pattern recognition in the TPC Cluster finder Track finder Track fit Global track fit ITS-TPC-TRD Vertex finder Event analysis Trigger decision

HLT architecture HLT is a generic high performance cluster Detectors DAQ HLT Mass storage

HLT building blocks (1) Hardware Nodes Network Infrastructure Sufficient computing power for p+p 121 Front-End PCs: 968 CPU cores, 1.935 TB RAM, equipped with custom PCI card for receiving detector data 51 Computing PCs: 408 CPU cores,1.104 TB RAM Network Infiniband backbone, GigaBit ethernet Infrastructure 20 redundant servers for all critical systems

HLT building blocks (2) Software Cluster management and monitoring Data transport and process synchronisation framework Interfaces to online systems: Experiement control system, Detector control system, Offline DB,... Event reconstruction and trigger applications

First paper

First paper

First paper

First paper

First paper

Planning pp run November 200 collision @ 900 GeV December 106 collisions @ 900 GeV Some collisions @ 2.4 TeV February-> collisions @ 7 TeV