Risk adjustment (margin)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model IAA Fund Meeting Kuala Lumpur, October 10, 2011 Darryl Wagner, FSA, MAAA.
Advertisements

IFRS 4 Phase II Insurance Contracts (Exposure Draft)
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
Session 8 IFRS and Solvency Requirements Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL-FIDES 25 November 2009, Lima Peru Takao Miyamoto, IAIS Secretariat.
Manulife Financial Corporation operates as John Hancock in the United States, and Manulife in other parts of the world. Enterprise Risk Management in Life.
11 Making Informed Judgments Part 9 Statistics, Measurement, and the Financial Crisis Navigating Accounting, ® G. Peter & Carolyn R. Wilson, ©
Risk & Capital Management A Regulator’s Perspective Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division, OSFI June 16, 2008.
*connectedthinking  Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Sabine Wuiame.
© 2002 KPMG – Dr. Kölschbach – IFRS for Insurance Contracts – 1.
GOOD PRACTICE IN REGULATING ANNUITY PROVIDERS Chris Daykin UK Government Actuary.
IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS. DEFINITIONS NOT SAME IAS 36 was reissued in March 2004 and applies to goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations.
Operational and Actuarial Aspects of Takaful Distribution of Surplus.
Use of Statistical Models on the Supervisory Process of
Jiří Fialka, Partner, Actuarial & Insurance Solutions Seminář z aktuárských věd, 25. listopadu 2005 IASP4: Investiční smlouvy. Oceňování investičních smluv.
Credit Standing in the Fair Value of Liabilities by Sam Gutterman & Mo Chambers presented at the 2003 Bowles Symposium by Sam Gutterman.
Course on Professionalism Statement of Principles.
PD - 16 Developments on International Accounting Standards From a P & C and Life Perspective Canadian Institute of Actuaries Annual Meeting David Oakden.
Click to edit Master title style Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar – San Diego, CA September 10 – 11, INSURANCE AND ACTUARIAL.
International Accounting Standards Board © 2011 IFRS Foundation. 30 Cannon Street | London EC4M 6XH | UK. The views expressed in this presentation.
International Actuarial Association Page1 ASSOCIATION ACTUARIELLE INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION IASB Board Meeting June 22, 2006 Presented.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary - PfAD Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné PED 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary - PfAD Colloque pour l’actuaire.
IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS)
Presentation on second IAIS Liabilities Paper1 Technical Committee 31 May 2006 IAIS Second Liabilities Paper Presentation to Technical Committee Rob Esson.
Financial Audit Autonomous Bodies AS 1 and 4 Session Accounting Standards.
Fair Value Measurement By: Feras Alghamdi Shawneen Kelly Austin Tullos Meredith Whitaker.
Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector Catherine Guttmann 15 March 2006 REPARIS Workshops on Accounting and Audit Regulation, Vienna, March 2006.
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian.
Andreas Rauter, UNIQA REPARIS Workshop, Vienna March 15, 2006 Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector.
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Impairment of assets.
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Munich Reinsurance Company of Canada September 14, 2004 Las Vegas Session 7 Loss Reserve.
Current IASB Position Contracts with Participating FeaturesContracts: Measurement of the Insurance Contract Liability.
1 PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES IN RATEMAKING (FIN - 12) Russ Bingham Vice President and Director of Corporate Research Hartford Financial Services Seminar.
Operational and Actuarial Aspects of Takaful Topic 13 Surplus Distribution.
International Accounting Standards for Insurance Contracts Fair Value Implications for Property/Casualty Insurance in the United States Casualty Actuarial.
1 RISK AND RETURN: DEBATING ALTERNATIVE MODELING “APPROACHES” (FIN - 10) Russ Bingham Vice President and Director of Corporate Research Hartford Financial.
Financial Accounting II Lecture 37. Following portion of the IAS was covered in the last lecture: Selection and application of accounting policies Consistent.
Premium Allocation Approach
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Impairment of assets
Participating Contracts
Sailing a Course through Risk Margins Will it be perilous?
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 10
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, December 1, 2016 Eric Lu
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, August 3, 2015 Eric Lu Session 18
Contractual Service Margins
Actuarial Valuation Methods
Real Estate Institute of Zimbabwe
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model
Loss Reserve Discounting – International Accounting Ralph Blanchard, FCAS CAS representative to the IAA Insurance Accounting Committee.
24th India Fellowship Seminar
FASB Targeted Improvements
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Chris Hancorn Session 32
IASB Questions & Feedback
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Bill Horbatt Session 33
Casualty Actuarial Society Practical discounting and risk adjustment issues relating to property/casualty claim liabilities Research conducted.
Accounting proposals for insurance contracts
CHAPTER 5 BOND PRICES AND RISKS.
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Bill Horbatt Session 33
Section 21 Provisions & Contingencies
Introduction to IFRS 17 for Non-Life Actuaries
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 11
Presentation Workshop
Contract boundaries Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Una scenografia teatrale della commedia dell’arte
Presentation transcript:

Risk adjustment (margin) Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Bill Horbatt Session 19

Agenda Definition of Risk Adjustment Risk Adjustment Techniques

Risk Adjustment (B76) Compensation that an entity requires for indifference between fulfilling: (a) Insurance contract liability that has a range of possible outcomes; and (b) fulfilling a liability with fixed cash flows with the same expected present value as the insurance contract.

Risk Adjustment (B77) (a) diversification and Risk adjustment is the compensation that the entity requires for bearing uncertainty about the amount and timing of cash flows that arise as the entity fulfils the contract, Risk adjustment reflects: (a) diversification and (b) both favourable and unfavourable outcomes.

Risk Adjustment (B78) The purpose of the risk adjustment is to measure the effect of uncertainty in the cash flows that arise from the insurance contract. Risk adjustment reflects all risks associated with the insurance contract, except those reflected through the use of market consistent inputs

Explicit risk adjustment (B79) Separate from estimates of future cash flows and discount rates that adjust for time value of money. These are disclosed separately from risk adjustment

Observations Risk adjustment is not a “cushion” to absorb volatility No cash value floor Risk adjustment is dynamic (“unlocked”) Independent of gain at issue (see “service margin”) No references to 3rd parties Liability adequacy test (loss recognition) not required

Risk Adjustment Techniques

Replicating portfolio (B80) The requirement that a risk adjustment must be included in the measurement in an explicit way does not preclude a ‘replicating portfolio’ approach. To avoid double-counting, the risk adjustment does not include any risk that is captured in the fair value of the replicating portfolio

Desirable Characteristics of Risk Margins IAA Risk Margins Paper (and in the insurance contract ED B81) 1. The less that is known about the current estimate and its trend; the higher the risk margins should be. 2. Risks with low frequency and high severity will have higher risk margins than risks with high frequency and low severity. 3. For similar risks, contracts that persist over a longer timeframe will have higher risk margins than those of shorter duration. 4. Risks with a wide probability distribution will have higher risk margins than those risks with a narrower distribution. 5. To the extent that emerging experience reduces uncertainty, risk margins will decrease, and vice versa.

Judgement (B82) Apply judgement choosing an appropriate risk adjustment technique. Requirement to translate the result of that technique into a confidence level if a different risk adjustment technique is used.

Risk Adjustment Techniques Prior ED (2010)Techniques for estimating the risk adjustment: Confidence Interval; Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE); and Cost of Capital. Other possible techniques Explicit margins in actuarial assumptions

Exposure Draft Confidence Interval: Likelihood that the actual outcome will be within specified interval. Sometimes referred to as Value at Risk (VaR). Easy to communicate and calculate. Not as useful for distribution that are not statistically normal. Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE or tail VaR): Better reflection of extreme losses. Focuses on the tail of the probability distribution → reflects aspects of insurance. Judgment required to determine band and may need to change in future periods.

Exposure Draft Cost of Capital: Applied in pricing, valuations and regulatory reporting, etc. Reflects estimated cost of holding required capital to meet obligations with high confidence. Need to determine capital rate that reflects risk relevant to liability. Approach used in SII for risk margin.

Desirable Characteristics of Risk Margins IASB Insurance Contract Discussion Paper 1. Applies a consistent methodology for the entire lifetime of the contract; 2. Uses assumptions consistent with those used in the determination of the corresponding current estimates; 3. Be determined in a manner consistent with sound insurance pricing practices; 4. Varies by product (class of business) based on risk differences between the products; 5. Ease of calculation; 6. Is consistently determined between reporting periods for each entity, i.e. the risk margin varies from period to period only to the extent that there are real changes in risk; 7. Is consistently determined between entities at each reporting date; i.e., two entities with similar business should produce similar risk margins using the methodology; 8. Facilitates disclosure of information useful to stakeholders; 9. Provides information that is useful to users of financial statements; 10. Consistent with regulatory solvency and other objectives; and 11. Consistent with IASB objectives.

Thank You