Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Measurement of Strain in the Left Ventricle during Diastole with cine-MRI and.
Advertisements

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Introduction of the Element Interaction Technique for Welding Analysis and Simulation.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Fatigue Limit Prediction of the Matrix of 17-4PH Stainless Steel Based on Small.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Considerations in the Design and Analysis of an ASME Section VIII, Div. 2 Reactor.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Tip Leakage Vortex for Operating Range Enhancement of Centrifugal.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Ratcheting Studies on Type 304LN Stainless Steel Elbows subjected to Combined Internal.
Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Comprehensive Parametric Finite Element Study on the Development of Strain Concentration.
Date of download: 6/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Error Correction Methods Applied to Solid.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Seismic Design of a Double Deck Floating Roof Type Used for Liquid Storage Tanks.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Turbulent Heat Transfer Over a Moving Surface Due to Impinging Slot Jets J. Heat.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 7/16/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study on Hardness and Elastic Modulus of Surface Nanostructured 304 Stainless.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Prediction of Vortex-Induced Vibration Response of a Pipeline Span by Coupling.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Impact Pressure on Reducing the Weld Residual Stress by Water Jet Peening.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: High Frequency Guided Wave Natural Focusing Pipe Inspection With Frequency and.
Date of download: 9/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Unified Approach for Notch Stress Strain Conversion Rules
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Forced Flexural Gravity Wave Motion in Two-Layer Fluid
From: Nonlinear Vibrations and Chaos in Floating Roofs
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Boilers Optimal Control for Maximum Load Change Rate
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Seismic Vibration Control Using Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Orifice Design of a Pilot-Operated Pressure Relief Valve
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Optimal Design of Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Design of Radiation Tolerant Nanostructured Metallic Multilayers
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: Schematic view of comprehensive seismic response analysis

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: (a) The location of the target pipeline, observation points, and assumed fault. The 12 black dots indicate subfaults of the assumed earthquake. The dotted line is the domain of the earthquake ground motion simulation. Pi (i = 1–7) indicate observation points. P4 indicates the target site. (b) Target pipeline with soil structure. The white line indicates the target pipeline, located at P4, and the contour map shows the elevation of the interface between the soft layer and the bedrock (elevation of the ground surface is 72 m).

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: (a) Three-dimensional crust model for computing earthquake ground motion with a fault rupture process and wave propagation. (b) Three-dimensional finite element model of the white rectangular part in (a).

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: Wave profiles and Fourier spectrum in NS directions at each observation point. (a) and (b) Wave profiles, the frequency components of which (i.e., <0.5 and 2.5 Hz) were cut off with a high-cut filter. (c) The Fourier spectrum of the wave profile.

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: Contour map of the elevation of the three-dimensional crust model

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: (a) Three-dimensional soil structure model. The white line indicates the target region and pipeline. A fictitious ground structure is added around the target region to remove reflected waves from the sides. (b) Composition of model. (c) Close-up view of finite element model.

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: Distribution of the time history norm of displacement and its maximum distribution

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: Distribution of the time history maximum principal strain and its maximum distribution

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comprehensive Seismic Response Analysis for Estimating the Seismic Behavior of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Ground Motion and Soil Amplification J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;138(5):051801-051801-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033250 Figure Legend: Maximum axial tensile strain along the pipeline (color contour) and depth distribution of the interface between the soft layer and the bedrock (black and white contour). These strains were computed from soil amplification analysis using wave profiles observed at P4 and P7.