RF Power Generation and PETS Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
I. Syratchev F D, GHza, mmb, mmR/Q, k  /m  M, % QMQM E S /E A K T, V/pC/m/m  D, % QDQD  D, deg
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
Proposals for conceptual design of the CLIC DR RF system at 2 GHz 20/10/2010 A.Grudiev.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
RF Power production at CTF3 X-band structure collaboration meeting,SLAC 6 th July 2009 Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  30 GHz power production  12 GHz power production.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
New RF design of CLIC DB AS Alexej Grudiev, BE-RF.
Higher-Order Modes and Beam-Loading Compensation in CLIC Main Linac Oleksiy Kononenko BE/RF, CERN CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting, March 14, 2012.
Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Overall strategy for the rf structure development program W. Wuensch CLIC ACE
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors LCWS, Arlington, Texas, October 22 th -26 th, 2012Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Overview of the CLIC main beam injectors.
Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Overall strategy for the rf structure development program W. Wuensch CLIC ACE
TBL experimental program Status and Results  Introduction  Status  Experimental program for 2010 and beyond  Outlook ACE, Steffen Döbert.
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
I. Syratchev, HGW 2012, KEK, Japan The high power demonstration of the PETS ON/OFF operation with beam. I. Syratchev for CLIC team.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
X-band Based FEL proposal
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
New test structures for CLIC (RF design)
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Summary of the test structure design
The CLIC Decelerator Beam Dynamics
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Progress in the design of a damped an
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
RF Parameters Calculation for JLEIC Colliders (e Ring)
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
Presentation transcript:

RF Power Generation and PETS Design I. Syratchev

Fixed input parameters for the CLIC 12 GHz PETS design: - Power production: Power/WDS = 76 MW WDS length (physical)=0.246 m Power limit/PETS ~ WDS ? Drive beam frequency = 12 GHz (first harmonic) Module layout: Quad + BPM length = 0.35 m PETS specific: Extractor length = 0.075 m Drive beam energy < 2.5 GeV Beam stability: Quad spacing  1 m PETS slotted configuration bring ~ 30% Wu enchantment. About 10% can be played back with optimizing the iris profile Module layouts #1 #2 #3 Unit length, m 1.0 Drive beam, GeV 2.25 Drive beam , A 93 Aperture, mm 15.7 23 30.8 Length, m 0.10 23 56.4 Power/PETS,MW 79 160 317 Wu/WDS (slotted) 0.46 1.0 1.37 Wt (norm./23mm) 3.1 1.0 0.42 Qt (norm./23 mm) 1.65 1.0 0.8 Layout #2 is the best compromise in terms of power production, beam stability and cost Module layouts #1 #2 #3

23 mm 12 GHz PETS base line RF design PETS parameters: Aperture = 23 mm Period = 6.253 mm (900/cell) Iris thickness = 2 mm R/Q = 2258 Ω V group= 0.453 Q = 7200 E surf. (160 MW)= 61 MV/m H surf. (160 MW) = 0.1 MA/m (ΔT max (140 ns, Cu) = 2.0 C0)

Power production efficiency In a structure with a high group velocity, the tail of the single bunch get the stronger deceleration. This effect can be compensated with a slight detuning of the structure synchronous mode frequency (Daniel). In general: the longer the structure and shorter the bunch, the less detuning detuning reduces beam stability ΔF, MHz Eff., % E0, GeV I,A 0 85.9 2.259 97.43 125 84 2.361 95.32 Note: this method was developed for the ancient 30 GHz CLIC PETS with ~ 80% Vg and provided efficiency recuperation about 7%

GDFIDL/HFSS/Wake model/PLACET: PETS Transverse wake Wake expression for the structure with high group velocity. Structure length – Ls. PLACET Loads Beta=0.702 C F=14.707 GHz Q=285 Kt=0.89 HFSS data Moderate damping Wt, V/pC/m/mm (log) Reflected wave |Ez| |E| Wake (single mode model) Wake (GDFIDL) Distance, m (log) Wt vs. aperture Heavy damping No damping EH Transverse wakes spectra, GDFIDL Moderate damping 23 mm 16 mm In a presence of the damping slots, the two competing transverse modes appear. The optimal balance between them should be found to provide stable beam transportation. Re (Zt) V/A/m/mm (log) 30 mm HE 12 Frequency, GHz Frequency, GHz

First and second harmonic, detuning and beam stability. For the given aperture and chosen method of damping, the wake amplitude and Q-factor can be estimated quite accurately. The draft PLCET simulations (W,Q f(Freq)) for the transverse frequency scan, Wake amplitude and Q scaling where done using layout #2. Drive beam frequency 12 GHz Drive beam frequency 6 GHz 84.% 80.1% 85.9% 86.1% For the CLIC PETS operating at a first harmonic the situation with the beam stability is rather critical (no safe margins) because of the natural frequency of the dominant transverse mode ~ 15 GHz. The detuning make the situation even worse and should be seriously discussed. The same time, operating at the second harmonic, the bunches sit close to the wake zero crossing providing a good stability

The control of the transverse modes frequencies and damping #1. Phase advance Radial #3. Damping slot configuration Inclined Iris 2.0 mm 900 1200 Impedance Impedance Frequency, GHz Flat #2. Iris thickness 3.5 mm 2.0 mm Phase/cell 1200 Impedance Frequency, GHz Wake integral at the punches center position Wt Frequency, GHz The lower phase advances and thinner irises favor the beam stability The damping slot configuration can be used for the fine tuning of the dangerous modes balance Distance, m Bunch number

GDFIDL & 9 modes model PETS with radial slots Beam envelope along decelerator simulated with PLACET (9 modes). Erik Adli Initial beam offset ~ Without detuning Q nominal Q nominal x 1.5 Frequency, GHz Q nominal x 1.5 With detuning Distance, m Q nominal Wt Q F

Further study towards 12 GHz CLIC PETS Power production: Optimization of the iris profile to reduce the surface peak power plow. Beam stability: Low frequencies HOM. Optimization of the damping slots and loads configuration. High frequencies HOM. Frequency detuning if necessary (phase advance). ON/OF capability: Integration of the detuning wedges. Minimization of their impact on the beam stability. Conclusion: Unit layout with 2 WDS/PETS and 2 PETS/ Quad is recommended as a baseline for configuration 12 GHz CLIC. Unit length 1.0 m, girder length 2.0 m. The PETS with 23 mm aperture, 900 phase advance per cell and iris thickness 2 mm is considered.