Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Control of Magnetic Chaos & Self-Organization John Sarff for MST Group CMSO General Meeting Madison, WI August 4-6, 2004.
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
ASIPP HT-7 belt limiter Houyang Guo, Sizhen Zhu and Jiangang Li Investigation of EAST Divertor Asymmetry in Plasma Detachment & Target Power Loading Using.
ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
Two-dimensional Structure and Particle Pinch in a Tokamak H-mode
Inter-ELM Edge Profile and Ion Transport Evolution on DIII-D John-Patrick Floyd, W. M. Stacey, S. Mellard (Georgia Tech), and R. J. Groebner (General Atomics)
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-10 TOKAMAK PLASMAS V. Vershkov, L.G. Eliseev, S.A. Grashin. A.V. Melnikov, D.A.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
Model prediction of impurity retention in ergodic layer and comparison with edge carbon emission in LHD (Impurity retention in the ergodic layer of LHD)
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
Rotation effects in MGI rapid shutdown simulations V.A. Izzo, P.B. Parks, D. Shiraki, N. Eidietis, E. Hollmann, N. Commaux TSD Workshop 2015 Princeton,
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
Tritium burnup fraction C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project meeting, July 27-28, 2011 Gaithersburg, MD.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
Edge characterization experiments in the National Spherical Torus Experiment V. A. Soukhanovskii and NSTX Research Team Session CO1 - NSTX ORAL session,
HT-7 ASIPP The Influence of Neutral Particles on Edge Turbulence and Confinement in the HT-7 Tokamak Mei Song, B. N. Wan, G. S. Xu, B. L. Ling, C. F. Li.
Session I-B – Overview Talks Lithium in Magnetic Confinement Experiments S. MirnovLi collection experiments on T-11M and T-10 in framework of Li closed.
Radial Electric Field Formation by Charge Exchange Reaction at Boundary of Fusion Device* K.C. Lee U.C. Davis *submitted to Physics of Plasmas.
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
1 EAST Recent Progress on Long Pulse Divertor Operation in EAST H.Y. Guo, J. Li, G.-N. Luo Z.W. Wu, X. Gao, S. Zhu and the EAST Team 19 th PSI Conference.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
Simulation of Turbulence in FTU M. Romanelli, M De Benedetti, A Thyagaraja* *UKAEA, Culham Sciance Centre, UK Associazione.
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
IAEA-TM 02/03/2005 1G. Falchetto DRFC, CEA-Cadarache Association EURATOM-CEA NON-LINEAR FLUID SIMULATIONS of THE EFFECT of ROTATION on ION HEAT TURBULENT.
Plasma Turbulence in the HSX Stellarator Experiment and Probes C. Lechte, W. Guttenfelder, K. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, D.T. Anderson HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Temperature Measurements of Limiter Surfaces at High Heat Flux in the HT-7 Tokamak H. Lin, X.Z. Gong, J. Huang, J.Liu, B. Shi, X.D. Zhang, B.N. Wan,
Similarities and differences in SOL physics
Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics
24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – IAEA CN-197
11th IAEA Technical Meeting on H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers" , September, 2007 Tsukuba International Congress Center "EPOCHAL Tsukuba",
Recycling and impurity retention in high-density,
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Development and Analysis of Gas Puff CXRS in SOL
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
K. Ida1,2, R. Sakamoto1,2, M. Yoshinuma1,2, K. Yamasaki3, T
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
KTM & CWGM 2006 Kyoto University, Kyoto ( Sep., 2006)
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
H. Nakano1,3, S. Murakami5, K. Ida1,3, M. Yoshinuma1,3, S. Ohdachi1,3,
Presentation transcript:

Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS Y. Feng, P.Grigull, F.Sardei, K.McCormick, J.Kisslinger Island divertor vs tokamak divertor -basic differences and similarities Transport features of attached plasmas Recycling, neutral screening & core-fueling Impurity screening of the edge islands  Detachment and detachment stability

Island divertor concept for low-shear stellarators W7-X W7-AS  An intermediate low-order island chain between confinement core and plasma-surface Interaction region, screening the core from direct penetration of recycling neutrals and sputtered Impurities Island divertor experiments in W7-AS from 2000 to 2002

Divertor vs limiter in W7-AS Easier density control even in the presence of strong NBI-sources - Significant improvement of recycling condition and particle pumping  High Density H-mode (HDH) maintainable quasi-stationary - concomitant dense, cold plasma in the edge islands Strong reduction of diverted energy flux onto targets via impurity line radiation - Existence of stable partial detachment in certain geometry and plasma parameter ranges - Intensive radiation outside confinement region, no serious degradation of global energy content

Island divertor vs tokamak divertor Tokamak Stellarator Poloidal-field divertor island divertor single-null double-null from single- to multi-null W7-AS: 8,9,10 Standard=9 W7-X: 4,5,6 Standard=5

1D SOL transport model core -V X-P. +V y target X-P. +V -V x y (Q introduced only for simple analysis) Stellarator specific

Flow damping & momentum loss nV (EMC3) + - V =0,stagnation divertor plate shadow Schematic expression V =0 V =0 V =0 -V +V radial x poloidal y target shadow target radial Q to upstream toroidal

An extended 2P-model with -transport (no CX-momentum loss, no volume energy losses) Large Q -> standard 2-point model

Extended-2P-model results -transport strongly damps downstream evolution

No high-recycling regime EMC3/EIRENE Langmuir probes on targets

Island neutral screening & particle re-fueling EMC3/EIRENE Experiment HDH-plasmas Island screening Low n low T Recycling provides the main fueling source for the core Island screening -> flattening of fueling rate In the flattening range, gas-puff increases only the SOL density, rather than the core density High density core correlates with dense, cold islands

Dense, cold islands shift CX-neutrals to a low energy band Energy spectrum of CX-neutrals hitting the Fe-wall EMC3/EIRENE nes=5×1019 m-3 CX Fe-wall 1×1019 H-atom / eV-1 E0 /eV

In/out asymmetry in reducing high-energetic CX-neutral on wall (E0 > threshold energy for Fe-sputtering) nes=1×1019 m-3 nes=5×1019 m-3 nes=1×1019 m-3 D=2 m2/s peaked ne-profile nes=5×1019 m-3 D=0.5 m2/s flat ne-profile Wall distribution of neutral flux with energy > 180 eV for a low- and high-nes case

Sensitivity of Fe-yield to nes, ne(r) and D EMC3-EIRENE →A high density in the edge islands is the most efficient parameter for reducing the wall-sputtering yield.

Impurity retention under high-density condition force balance 1D radial continuity: (Z-independent) 0 4cm X Core Island SOL Solution for target-released impurities: A positive (outwards), large V*ZII reduces the impurity density at separatrix!

Simple analysis contd. Condition for V*zII>0 : (KRASHENINNIKOV, Nucl. Fusion 1991) 1D energy transport for ion: Because of the small Q (~0.001) in W7-AS, the parallel heat conduction can be significantly reduced by the perpendicular one. The latter becomes even dominating under the condition: => high-n, low-T SOL plasma favorable for SOL impurity retention

+ = + = Impurity flow reversal EMC3/EIRENE thermal force > friction inwards flow + = low edge density thermal force < friction outwards flow + = high edge density

Strong reduction of C density at separatrix (normalized to total carbon yield in order to isolate transport from production) thermal-forces draw carbon to separatrix frictional plasma flow flushes carbon back to targets EMC3/EIRENE low nes high nes low nes high nes

Sharp transition from thermal-force dominated to friction-dominated transport EMC3/EIRENE Friction dominates Thermal force dominates sharp transition because of high sensitivity of classical heat conductivity to Ti

High density for detachment transition Td=10 eV Extended 2P-model absence of a high-recycling regime shift of detachment transition to a high nes 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 EMC3/EIRENE with PSOL = 1 MW Intrinsic carbon Abrupt detachment transition observed in experiments under conditions: In good agreement with the code prediction

Detachment stability depends on island geometry Experiments change of Dx stable E /kJ P/MW time (density ramp) PNBI Prad #56846 #56848 change of Lc #56843 #56847 time Experimental results Lc para. targ-X-p. dist. /m DX radial targ-X-p. dist. /cm

Stable partial detachment Experimental finding: a) stable detachment requires large islands with large Q b) stable detachment always partial Power load on target EMC3/EIRENE EMC3/EIRENE C-radiation H-ionization (inboard side) (divertor region) Thermography power supply hot spot

(independent of island geometry) Marfe-like phenomena small islands or field-line pitch ~ density limit (independent of island geometry) EMC3/ EIRENE Weak neutral screening Unstable (exp.) Complete detachment Unstable Strong degradation of te Unstable, intensive radiation zone appearing at the inboard midplane observed by a CCD camera when plasma approaches density limit. Increase density

Impact of radiation location on neutral screening sensitivity of neutral screening to configuration, nes and Psol EMC3/EIRENE divertor radiation Psol=1 MW G / G recyc core NBI 0.8 MW inboard side radiation nes 1013 cm-3 Divertor radiation  cold recycling zone  less efficient for neutral screening ‘less efficient’ means: 1) higher Grecyc into core (smaller DX) 2) more sensitive to change of nes or Psol (radiation location)

Summary Plasma: The -to-‖ transport ratio can be changed from <1 to >1, depending on divertor configurations and plasma parameters. Flow-damping -> no high recycling regime. Weak neutral screening -> strong edge-core coupling - recycling neutrals are the main fueling source for the core - recycling and refueling process nonlinear -> instabilities For example, the abrupt change of edge plasma state observed in density-ramp experiments and the geometry-related detachment instability. Recycling neutrals: Impurity: Dense, cold islands – favorable for reducing influx of intrinsic impurities - Reduction of impurity sputtering yield from CX-neutrals - Frictional plasma flow flushes Impurities

Summary contd. Detachment: Detachment transition: High densities needed for detachment Abrupt change in radiation level and location Stability (depending on island geometry) stable detachment is always partial and needs sufficiently- large islands -inboard-side radiation -> warm recycling region -> good neutral screening small islands -> divertor radiation -> loss of neutral screening -> unstable Marfes (unstable) appear always on the inboard side, inside LCFS whenever a plasma approaches density limit, independent of configuration.

Principle: Divertor vs limiter q G core Limiter target impurity radial separatrix q G Divertor core impurity  An intermediate SOL exists between confinement core and plasma-surface Interaction region, screening the core from direct penetration of recycling neutrals and sputtered Impurities.