Review of System Alerts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Transparency Proposal Transmission Workstream 2 nd November 2006 Presentation by Abid Sheikh, energywatch and Angela Love, Poyry Energy.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Review of the UNC Post-emergency Arrangements Workshop 1 March 2009.
Revision of the UNC Post-Emergency Arrangements draft proposal July 2009.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Gas Balancing Alert Transmission Workstream – Oct 2005 Ritchard Hewitt.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
Information provision for winter 09/10 Jenny Phillips – GNCC Strategy & Support Manager.
OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.
Delivering Connections and Capacity RIIO-T1 and associated commercial changes - Summary June 7th 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
Gas storage: GB experience and future trends Sonia Brown Director, European Strategy and Environment GSE Conference - May 2007.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Review of the UNC Post-emergency Claims Arrangements Strawman February 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
GC0104 – Demand Connection Code (DCC)
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
System information provision
Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011
Non-approved draft Transmission Workstream, 6th December 2007
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Transmission Planning Code
Transmission Workgroup 4th October 2012
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
SO Incentives from April 2010
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Review of System Alerts
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
Gas Security of Supply SCR Proposals: Credit Implications for the GB Gas Market Introducing a new Transmission Workgroup Topic 4 October 2012.
Publication of Zonal Flex Data
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Enduring Offtake Arrangements (Including an alternative daily interruptible capacity release mechanism to facilitate use of spare capacity) Peter Bolitho.
Development of Firm Monitor & GBA
Enhanced information provision and revision of the Gas Balancing Alert for Winter 2009 July 2009.
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
MOD National Grid NTS Initiated Flow Swaps
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Transmission Planning Code Review
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Proposed Changes to UNC Section O
UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Richard Fairholme Transmission Workstream 4th September 2008
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Entry Overrun Calculation
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Transmission Workstream - EU 3rd Package Update
Open Letter - Summary of Responses
CAM: Next Steps UNC Transmission Workgroup Lisa Martin 9 January 2014.
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Proposed Changes to UNC Section Q Emergencies - Mod 035
Gas Customer Forum 28 July 2008
Capacity Access Review
Presentation transcript:

Review of System Alerts Transmission Workgroup 24th August 2011

Agenda Background Analysis of Prevailing GBA arrangements Overview D-1 GBA issues Within Day GBA issues GBA review scope General issues within scope for review D-1 and Within day GBA specific issues within scope for review Next Steps SOS Review aimed at exploring potential refinements or revisions to Gas Deficit Emergency Arrangements. Industry recommendations coincides with our own decision to review GBA.

Background GBA has been in place for 5 years The GBA sought to provide a signal to the Industry that a significant end of day NTS system imbalance is forecast. GBA principally implemented to provide the industry with a signal for demand side response, where a significant gas flow deficit was forecasted either day ahead or within day. Recent user feedback indicates that some aspects of the GBA signal may no longer be as effective as when initially introduced. Timely review fits with SCR focus on Gas Deficit Emergency arrangements. Intent of review is to focus is on preventative measures, alerting the market to respond. SOS Review aimed at exploring potential refinements or revisions to Gas Deficit Emergency Arrangements. Industry recommendations coincides with our own decision to review GBA.

Analysis of Prevailing Gas Balancing Alert arrangements Transmission Workgroup 24th August 2011

What Is a Gas Balancing Alert (GBA) National Grid have a UNC obligation (V 5.9) to alert system users to a EOD supply/demand imbalance via a Gas Balancing Alert (GBA) A GBA has two triggers, day ahead (no discretion) or within day (discretion) Or Expectation on the market to respond by increasing supply or initiating a demand side reduction.

Day Ahead GBA UNC reference UNC reference section V5.9.3 ‘National Grid NTS shall issue (by means of publication on its website) an alert (a “Gas Balancing Alert”) where, after forecasting demand for a Gas Flow Day in accordance with Section H 5.2.3 and Section H5.2.4 on the Preceding Day, the Forecast Total System Demand for the Gas Flow Day in question is greater than or equal to the Forecast Total System Supply for such Gas Flow Day.’ National Grid has no discretion in issuing the day ahead GBA.

Within day GBA UNC reference UNC reference section V5.9.4: ‘National Grid NTS may issue (by means of publication on its website) a Gas Balancing Alert where during a Gas Flow Day, an incident is notified to National Grid NTS that would (in the reasonable opinion of National Grid NTS) reduce the Forecast Total System Supply for that Gas Flow Day by at least twenty five (25) MCM per Day and the remaining Forecast Total System Supply for that Gas Flow Day is less than or equal to the Forecast Total System Demand.’ National Grid has discretion in determining whether to issue the within day GBA.

GBA Information Provision Each day the Gas National Control Centre (GNCC) calculates a day ahead GBA trigger level. Upon completion of this process the day ahead GBA trigger level and alert status will be published on the National Grid website. Day ahead GBA trigger level http://marketinformation.natgrid.co.uk/gas/frmPrevalingView.aspx If a GBA is declared the Alert will display as “ALERT”. If a GBA is not declared the alert will display as “NONE”. A GBA report is published daily which gives a 5 day view of supply and demand relative to the GBA trigger level, along with information relating to the Safety Monitor position. Daily GBA and Storage Monitor Position Report http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Gas/Data/GBA/

Day Ahead GBA Trigger Level The GBA trigger level is National Grids view of total system supply for the winter period which is calculated and applied day ahead. This conservative view of supply is made up of two aggregated supply components. 1. Non Storage Supplies (NSS) A view of likely NSS supplies are produced by National Grid in advance of the winter period and are published externally in the Winter Outlook document. NSS supplies are assessed monthly throughout the winter period as actual supply data is recorded. Any significant deviations away from the prevailing NSS assumption can reduce or increase the NSS value, leading to changes in the GBA trigger level. 2. Storage Supplies Any storage facility with two or more days deliverability, at assumed maximum rates, will be included in the GBA day ahead trigger level. Storage sites without GBA qualifying deliverability will not be included in the GBA trigger level, and the trigger level will be reduced by the maximum deliverability for those sites. National Grids methodology for calculating a view of total system supply (the GBA Trigger Level) was communicated at the October 2010 Operations Forum. We believe this process is both Transparent & Predictable

Issues with the D-1 GBA Trigger Level Methodology The UNC definition for the day ahead GBA process implies that National Grid is forecasting total system supplies for the coming gas. The current methodology is a view of total system supplies for the winter period, which is reviewed monthly. Supply patterns are too volatile to accurately forecast day ahead. Issuing a Gas Balancing Alert is no longer appropriate using the current methodology

D-1 GBA – Supply Over delivery

Issues with Current D-1 GBA Trigger Level Methodology Questions for Debate Is there still value in sending a day ahead message using the current GBA Trigger Level methodology? Should National Grid have discretion day ahead? 3. What should we call it? 4. Should we change the methodology for the trigger level? more frequent reviews? Treat LNG like storage? (supply based on deliverability) 5. Is a market response required?

Within Day GBA The within Day GBA is triggered by an incident that will reduce supplies by 25mcm/d for the remainder of the gas day leading to an EOD supply demand imbalance National Grid has discretion on within day GBA’s Expectation on the market to balance EOD position (supply/Demand side response to GBA)

Within Day GBA issues No ability to withdraw a GBA (within day supply recovery) Current process targets an EOD response only No ability to signal a within day issue (physical linepack issue) potential GDE Currently constrained to a within day alert

Transmission Workgroup 24th August 2011 GBA Review Scope Transmission Workgroup 24th August 2011

General Issues within scope for review National Grid perceived areas for review: Refining prevailing UNC GBA provisions; Renaming and splitting of the reference ‘GBA’ to separately defined within day and day ahead signals; Aligning UNC with the calculation methodology undertaken by National Grid NTS during the GBA; Introducing the ability for National Grid NTS to recall a GBA notice. Improve understanding and monitoring of how National Grid NTS and the market responds to a GBA; National Grid NTS – consider what information would help the market to initiate timely response; Industry information – consider what information would aid system operation in times of high system stress. Any industry concerns in addition to the issues described?

D-1 and Within Day GBA specific issues within scope for review Issues to be addressed in respect of specific GBA type : Day Ahead GBA; aligning UNC with the calculation methodology undertaken by National Grid NTS during the GBA; ability for National Grid NTS to recall a GBA notice. Within Day GBA; ability for NGG to signal a within day issue; Any industry concerns in addition to the issues described?

Next Steps… Discuss with Demand-side parties (via DSWG) Further develop ideas Present draft strawman proposal(s) to the industry Raise Modification Proposal