MedDRA and Ontology Discussion of Strategy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Semantic Interoperability in Health Informatics: Lessons Learned 10 January 2008Semantic Interoperability in Health Informatics: Lessons Learned 1 Medical.
Advertisements

Adverse Events Consolidated User Story 1: Healthcare Provider Reporting User Story Names: Actors: Flow of Events: Pre-condition Post-condition Preferred.
The ORCHID project Dr Ian Gaywood, NUH Dr Ira Pande, NUH Professor John Chelsom, City University London.
WHO Agenda: Classifications – Terminologies - Standards
© 2005 by Prentice Hall Appendix 2 Automated Tools for Systems Development Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F.
Amy Sheide Clinical Informaticist 3M Health Information Systems USA Achieving Data Standardization in Health Information Exchange and Quality Measurement.
©2013 MFMER | slide-1 Building A Knowledge Base of Severe Adverse Drug Events Based On AERS Reporting Data Using Semantic Web Technologies Guoqian Jiang,
Update on Vocabularies and Value Sets for Meaningful Use Betsy Humphreys, MLS, FACMI Deputy Director National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
Software Quality Assurance Inspection by Ross Simmerman Software developers follow a method of software quality assurance and try to eliminate bugs prior.
Universal Core Semantic Layer (UCore SL) An Ontology-Based Supporting Layer for UCore 2.0 Presenter: Barry Smith National Center for Ontological Research.
Biomedical Informatics Some Observations on Clinical Data Representation in EHRs Christopher G. Chute, MD DrPH, Mayo Clinic Chair, ICD11 Revision, World.
ISS IT Assessment Framework
Why are ontologies needed to achieve EHR interoperability? Barry Smith 1.
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences Biomedical Ontology in Buffalo Part I: The Gene Ontology Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
What is an Ontology? AmphibiaTree 2006 Workshop Saturday 8:45–9:15 A. Maglia.
The Core Infectious Disease Ontology. Purpose: To make infectious disease-relevant data deriving from different sources comparable and computable Across.
PRD_codes_KS_ ppx. UK Renal SNOMED CT subset incorporating the new ERA-EDTA PRDs and how we can use them in Rare Disease Groups Keith Simpson.
The IHTSDO Workbench A Terminology Management Tool John Gutai, IHTSDO May 2011 For OHT.
Veterinary Terminology Services Lab Va-Md Regional College of Veterinary Medicine The Animal Names Terminology Subset of SNOMED CT ® Suzanne L. Santamaria,
Limning the CTS Ontology Landscape Barry Smith 1.
Knowledge representation
EHR Clinical data repository and pharmacovigilance Suzanne Markel-Fox 12 October 2007.
Imports, MIREOT Contributors: Carlo Torniai, Melanie Courtot, Chris Mungall, Allen Xiang.
1 Establishing a MedDRA Safety Surveillance Unit Thanh Van T. Doan, RPh PSI International Inc. Working With MedDRA The New Connaught Rooms London, UK 17.
SNOMED CT – Distributed Content Management Stefan Schulz Content Committee April 2, 2009.
Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.
More and Better Data for Research: U.S. Health Data Content Standards Betsy L. Humphreys Assistant Director for Health Services Research Information National.
The Final Study Period Report on MFI 6: Model registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Sydney May 26, 2008 H. Horiuchi, Keqing He, Doo-Kwon Baik SC32WG2.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
1 FRENCH PROPOSAL FOR ESARR6 1 - BACKGROUND - 15/02/00 : Kick-off meeting, Presentation of the CAA/SRG input (SW01), Request from the chairman to comment.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Understanding eMeasures – And Their Impact on the EHR June 3, 2014 Linda Hyde, RHIA.
SSO: THE SYNDROMIC SURVEILLANCE ONTOLOGY Okhmatovskaia A, Chapman WW, Collier N, Espino J, Conway M, Buckeridge DL Ontology Description The SSO was developed.
Object Oriented Multi-Database Systems An Overview of Chapters 4 and 5.
Software quality factors
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
Approach to building ontologies A high-level view Chris Wroe.
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Quality Workgroup: Progress Report Janet Corrigan Floyd Eisenberg National Quality Forum August 20, 2009.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST WP4: Ontology Engineering Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Michel Klein Vrije Universiteit.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4a Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
Methods We employ the UMLS Metathesaurus to annotate ICD-9 codes to MedDRA preferred terms (PTs) using the three-step process below. The mapping was applied.
The Agricultural Ontology Server (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Food and Agriculture Organization.
What is MedDRA? Med = Medical D = Dictionary for R = Regulatory
© University of Manchester Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 unported 3.0 license Quality Assurance, Ontology Engineering, and Semantic Interoperability.
Representing and Reasoning with Heterogeneous, Modular and Distributed ontologies UniTN/IRST contribution to KnowledgeWeb.WP 2.1.
Frequent Criticisms too ambitious recreation of a Textbook of Medicine competing with SNOMED-CT replicates the work done elsewhere: DSM, ICPC, too academic.
Assessing SNOMED CT for Large Scale eHealth Deployments in the EU Workpackage 2- Building new Evidence Daniel Karlsson, Linköping University Stefan Schulz,
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
Representation of Hypersensitivity, Allergy and adverse reactions in SNOMED CT Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD.
Appendix 2 Automated Tools for Systems Development
The “Common Ontology” between ICD 11 and SNOMED CT
SNOMED CT® in Surgical Pathology and Cancer Registry Work
SNOMED CT Logic Profile Enhancement Yongsheng Gao, 2017/07/11
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Midwest Biopharmaceutical Statistics Workshop
Achieving Semantic Interoperability of Cancer Registries
Medical Natural Language Understanding now and tomorrow
Development of the Amphibian Anatomical Ontology
Life Cycle Models PPT By :Dr. R. Mall.
Secondary Uses Primary Use EHR and other Auhortities Clinical Trial
Semantic Alignment between ICD-11 and SNOMED-CT
Mapping Special Interest Group SNOMED IHTSDO
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Semantic Interoperability
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
ICD10PCS to SNOMED standardization
Presentation transcript:

MedDRA and Ontology Discussion of Strategy Barry Smith and Mélanie Courtot

Create an ontology directly by correcting MedDRA subsumption hierarchy Other cases such as Increased/decreased

Create an ontology directly by correcting MedDRA subsumption hierarchy Other cases such as Increased/decreased

Create an Ontology via Definitions Create formal definitions for some subset (module) of MedDRA terms using one or more of: AERO – Adverse Event Reporting Ontology OAE – Ontology of Adverse Events SNOMED Use a reasoner to create a corresponding MedDRA ontology module

Strategy for Definitions Add definitions to PTs Add relations such as location of the adverse event Have a reasoner classify the resulting ontology In each anatomical system group, check and add relations between PTs (e.g. abdominal pain lower is_a abdominal pain)

Examples from Adverse Event Reporting Ontology (AERO) Mélanie Courtot Simon Fraser University

Automate classification of adverse events Using a MedDRA- based mapping, I successfully encoded existing clinical guidelines for adverse events classification Anaphylaxis MedDRA (800 terms) --> Brighton guidelines --> Brighton ontology (32 terms) This is a strategy to create an ontology counterpart of one portion of MedDRA

Benefits of creating a MedDRA ontology Interoperability with other data resources drug surveillance EHR data Gene Ontology and related ontologies Currently SMQs built and maintained manually; the proposed ontology would allow us to build inclusion and exclusion criteria to create SMQs automatically, and also to update these SMQs automatically as MedDRA itself is changes -- saving time and effort (which could be quantified) It would provide also the ability to add multiple SMQs for the same AE, e.g. based on different guidelines Enhanced quality assurance Enhanced consistency checking

Data quality – ontology promotes assigning as early as possible in the pipeline; promote MedDRA as coding system to be used in the lab or clinic Secondary use: promotes using MedDRA data for research in the public domain for FDA different features are important than are important for clinical and translational science

Create Ontology to serve as Master MedDRA Using MedDRA Have MedDRA Ontology as core, with different views / linearizations of this core (ICD 11 model) for regulatory purposes for secondary uses for attaching term IDs for attaching English terms and terms and synonyms in other languages one target for maintenance with changes propagated through the whole structure