Simplified Traffic Model Based On Aggregated Network Statistics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1144r1 Submission W.Carney et al (Sony, Ericsson) Slide 1 Simplified Traffic Model Based On Aggregated Network Statistics Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1157r3 SubmissionYunzhou Li, Tsinghua Univ.Slide 1 Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW Date: Authors: September.
Sleep States in IEEE ax Simulation Scenarios
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Power Save Calibration Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0728r1 SubmissionSlide 1 Network Optimization for Expected HEW Traffic Patterns Date: Authors: W.Carney, K.Agardh, H.Suzuki.
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Lin Yingpei (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /1438r0 Submission November 2013 Slide 1 Traffic Observation and Study on Virtual Desktop Infrastructure.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0789r0 July 2015 Allan Jones, ActivisionSlide 1 Proposed changes to Evaluation Methodologies Date: ?? Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1305r0 Submission W.Carney, et. al. (SONY) Slide 1 Simplification of HEW Traffic Model Simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /342r0 Submission March 2014 Naveen Kakani, CSRSlide 1 Short Packet Optimizations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1077r1 Submission Sep 2013 Slide 1 EDCA Enhancements for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddress Phone Hui
Doc.: IEEE /0383r0 Submission Considerations on evaluation methodology for candidate HEW PHY&MAC techniques Date: March 2014 Le Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1158r0 September 2013 William Carney (SONY)Slide 1 Video Traffic and Applications for HEW Date: Authors:
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 March 2016
Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 March 2016
Impact of LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum on Wi-Fi
Sleep States in IEEE ax Simulation Scenarios
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area NetworksTM
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
On High Efficiency WLAN (HEW) TG PAR Scope
Uplink Broadcast Service
28 October, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Beacon-based Multi-Channel MAC for.
Thoughts on RTA Development
Thoughts on RTA Development
Thoughts on RTA Development
Thoughts on RTA development
WLAN network behavior under heavy load
Packet Prioritization Issues
Discussion on EHT timeline and scope
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Intended IG Objectives] Date Submitted:
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
RTA report summary Date: Authors: Jan 2019
EDCA Enhancements for HEW
Discussion on EHT timeline and scope
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Orchestrator pilot signal
Evaluation of RR over EDCF
System Level Simulation Results of Full Duplex Transmission
Modeling and Evaluating Variable Bit rate Video Steaming for ax
D2D Technology for HEW Date: Authors: January 2010
A New Metric for Evaluating the Throughput of HEW
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Video Application Categories and Characteristics
LC MAC submission – follow up
Discussion on The EHT Timeline and PAR Definition
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Multiple RF operation for ax OFDMA
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Simplified Traffic Model Based On Aggregated Network Statistics Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2013 Simplified Traffic Model Based On Aggregated Network Statistics Date: 2013-09-16 Authors: John Doe, Some Company

Simplified Traffic Model Based On Aggregated Network Statistics Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2013 Simplified Traffic Model Based On Aggregated Network Statistics Date: 2013-09-16 Authors: John Doe, Some Company

September 2013 Abstract Data traffic over cellular networks and WLAN is converging due to off-loading to and integration with Wi-Fi. Increased system capacity drives data consumption. Demand is highly elastic. Evaluation of HEW proposals will benefit from considering cellular traffic models, not only simplified standalone use cases.

September 2013 Contribution Purpose Establish understanding of what data traffic is flowing through today’s cellular networks. Create awareness of the potential similarities between cellular and Wi-Fi data traffic. Ensure simulations, evaluations of use cases and future MAC/PHY proposals take these traffic characteristics into account.

Comparison with Cellular Networks September 2013 Comparison with Cellular Networks Future Wi-Fi networks and cellular networks will be comparable in characteristics Same applications, similar throughput and latency Seamless experience to the end user. Users will often not be aware, not from UI nor from QoE, whether WAN or WLAN is used HEW can take advantage of traffic statistics from cellular networks Use available real cellular statistics as input in evaluation methods Simulations can be easily compared between cellular and HEW

Traffic Increases When Capacity Allows September 2013 Traffic Increases When Capacity Allows General consensus that video traffic will drive capacity requirements. This will be even further emphasized by the fact that more bandwidth is used if more capacity is available MB Data volume for different traffic categories One smartphone model, same network, same time period Ref: Ericsson measurement, 2012 / Q4, smartphone-dominated mature LTE/HSPA/2G network

Burst Size Distribution September 2013 Burst Size Distribution Percentage of small bursts are increasing due to application and user behavior Ref: Ericsson measurement, 2012 / Q4, smartphone-dominated mature LTE/HSPA/2G network

Burst Size per Traffic Type Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2013 Burst Size per Traffic Type Looking at bursts of packets: For all traffic types, absolute majority of UL bursts are < 1500 Bytes Social networking (like voice, Skype, Facebook) bursts are < 100 Bytes UL video is expected to increase, so no clear asymmetry between UL and DL Distribution of UL burst size Distribution of DL burst size Ref: Anatomy of Wi-Fi Access Traffic of Smartphones and Implications for Energy Saving Techniques, R Palit et al. John Doe, Some Company

Bursty Data Traffic Model Proposal September 2013 Bursty Data Traffic Model Proposal We propose to include aggregated traffic as required for HEW simulation usecase(s) Key properties: Simulations shall be run both UL and DL. Defined properties of bursty data: Defined max time for gaps between packets within a burst (Example < ~5s *) End of burst defined by long time to next packet (Example > ~5s *) Defined total amount of data within each burst (Example in table *) Burst size (B) Frequency (%) 50 20 100 15 200 10 500 Burst size (B) Frequency (%) 1k 15 1500 10k * Note : Exact figures pending further measurements

September 2013 Summary and Next Steps Proposed HEW traffic model should be based on bursty traffic extrapolated from measurements in WAN (and WLAN) WAN/WLAN network data illustrate importance of simulating proposed HEW solutions with a distribution of packet sizes/bursts, both Up and Downlink, rather than static packet size per use case HEW should take opportunity to reflect convergent WLAN/WAN traffic scenarios and enable comparisons and benchmarking of WLAN PHY/MAC with WAN Traffic patterns Simulation and propagation models

September 2013 References [1] Ericsson measurement, 2012/Q4, smartphone-dominated mature LTE/HSPA/2G network [2] Network optimizations for expected traffic patterns. IEEE July 2013 11-13-0728-00-0hew-Network-optimization-for-expected-traffic-patterns_v01 [3] Anatomy of Wi-Fi Access Traffic of Smartphones and Implications for Energy Saving Techniques, R. Palit et al http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJEIC/vol3_Is1/1.pdf