NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ATST Imager and Slit Viewer Optics Ming Liang. 2 Optical layout of the telescope, relay optics, beam reducer and imager. Optical Layouts.
Advertisements

What data need to be measured? Scattering from: specimen in its container empty specimen container standard or calibration specimen.
Diffraction See Chapter 10 of Hecht.
FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Wide-field, triple spectrograph with R=5000 for a fast 22 m telescope Roger Angel, Steward Observatory 1 st draft, December 4, 2002 Summary This wide-field,
Interference and Diffraction
Overlapping Orders Douglas A. Skoog and James J. Leary, Principles of Instrumental Analysis, Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, d(sin  + sin.
Astronomical Spectroscopy
THE LHIRES-III SPECTROGRAPH © C2PU, Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis Jean-Pierre Rivet CNRS, OCA, Dept. Lagrange
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Image Formation. Input - Digital Images Intensity Images – encoding of light intensity Range Images – encoding of shape and distance They are both a 2-D.
6e-1 Science Data Products Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer S&OC System Design Review #1.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Computer Science 631 Lecture 7: Colorspace, local operations
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Spectroscopic Observations (Massey & Hanson 2011, arXiv v2.pdf) Examples of Spectrographs Spectroscopy with CCDs Data Reduction and Calibration.
High Resolution Echelle Spectrograph for Chinese Weihai 1m Telescope. Leiwang, Yongtian Zhu, Zhongwen Hu Nanjing institute of Astronomical Optics Technology.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Sphere Standards and Standard Spheres Dr. Richard Young Optronic Laboratories, Inc.
Astronomical Spectroscopy Notes from Richard Gray, Appalachian State, and D. J. Schroeder 1974 in “Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 12-Part A Optical.
Integral Field Spectroscopy. David Lee, Anglo-Australian Observatory.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Figure 8.Color map of the geometric correction along the dispersion axis for segment A. Figure 4. Measured distortions for all PSA positions for segment.
ACS Drizzling Overview J. Mack; DA Training 10/5/07 Distortion Dither Strategies MultiDrizzle ‘Fine-tuning’ Data Quality Photometry.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
WFIRST IFU -- Preliminary “existence proof” Qian Gong & Dave Content GSFC optics branch, Code 551.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
Practical applications: CCD spectroscopy Tracing path of 2-d spectrum across detector –Measuring position of spectrum on detector –Fitting a polynomial.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
Overview, Spectrometer Products and Processing Philosophy Phil Appleton on Behalf of PACS Team PACS IFU Spectrometer.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
STScI Slitless Spectroscopy Workshop November 2010 aXe Advanced Topics – becoming more dextrous, using aXe with other instruments, making calibration.
Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University.
06 Oct 05Space Science & Technology Dept1 Solar Orbiter Consortium Meeting 03 Mar 06 Optical Design Of Solar Orbiter Normal Incidence Spectrometer KF Middleton.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE.
F. Pepe Observatoire de Genève Optical astronomical spectroscopy at the VLT (Part 2)
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Ferruit (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford), S. Charlot (IAP),
Spectrometer The instrument used for the astronomers MinGyu Kim
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
SINFONI data reduction using the ESO pipeline. Instrument design and its impact on the data (I) integral field spectrometer using mirrors brickwall pattern.
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Jakobsen (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), T. Beck (STScI), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford),
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
JWST Pipeline Overview
Diane Karakla ESAC “On Your Mark” Workshop Madrid, Sept
Spectrophotometric calibration of the IFU spectrograph
NIRSpec simulation data-package
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
THE LHIRES-III SPECTROGRAPH
Introduction to Spectroscopy
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Integral Field Spectroscopy
MIRI Observing Templates
UVIS Calibration Update
How we do Spectroscopy An Overview
UVIS Calibration Update
Spectroscopic Observations (Massey & Hanson 2011, arXiv v2
X-ray high resolution spectra in the VO: the case of XMM-Newton RGS
Presentation transcript:

NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker Instrument characteristics multi-object spectrograph --> every detector pixel sees every wavelength reflective optics (incl. dispersive elements) --> large, variable slit curvature used on a diffraction-limited telescope --> PSF varies with l wide wavelength range (0.6 - 5 mm) --> chromatic slit losses off-axis telescope and wide field of view --> significant distortion

NIRSpec pipeline concept Active MSA area Mounting frame Fixed slits and IFU aperture Detector array Direction of dispersion

NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker Instrument characteristics multi-object spectrograph --> every detector pixel sees every wavelength reflective optics (incl. dispersive elements) --> large, variable slit curvature used on a diffraction-limited telescope --> PSF varies with l wide wavelength range (0.6 - 5 mm) --> chromatic slit losses off-axis telescope and wide field of view --> significant distortion Headaches.....

A first outline of the NIRSpec pipeline RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics, & “default” chromatic slit loss) MSA CONFIG. & DISTORTION MAP GW TELEMETRY GEOMETRIC DISTORTION (spatial) FINAL l CALIBRATION (dispersion solution) “DELTA” CHROMATIC SLIT LOSS CORR. ABSOLUTE FLUX CALIBRATION EXTRACT 1-D SPECTRUM SUBTRACT BACKGROUND FINAL 1D SPECTRUM FLATFIELD REF. CUBE GRATING EQUATION PHOTFLAM KEYWORD BIAS/DARK REF. FRAMES “P-FLAT” REF. FRAME LINEARITY CORR. LINEARITY (Assuming no l-dependence) One window for every open shutter….

Defining the extraction windows MSA mask Red: object, green: background Each spectrum has “extraction box” on FPA Extraction boxes overlap, possible “spill-over”

An outline of the NIRSpec pipeline RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics, & “default” chromatic slit loss) MSA CONFIG. & DISTORTION MAP GW TELEMETRY GEOMETRIC DISTORTION (spatial) FINAL l CALIBRATION (dispersion solution) “DELTA” CHROMATIC SLIT LOSS CORR. ABSOLUTE FLUX CALIBRATION EXTRACT 1-D SPECTRUM SUBTRACT BACKGROUND FINAL 1D SPECTRUM FLATFIELD REF. CUBE GRATING EQUATION PHOTFLAM KEYWORD BIAS/DARK REF. FRAMES “P-FLAT” REF. FRAME LINEARITY CORR. LINEARITY (Assuming no l-dependence) One window for every open shutter….

Operations on the extraction windows Same as those carried out for traditional ground-based MOS flat-field (uniformity of detector response): f(l), f(x,y) tracing the spectrum and rectifying it: f(l), f(x,y) wavelength calibration: f(l), f(x,y) flux calibration (throughput of optics and gratings): f(l), f(x,y) absolute flux calibration But wait… Because of NIRSpec’s design (e.g. MSA always in the way), some of the steps above must be carried out simultaneously, require calibration measurements that are intertwined

Throughput correction of “Flat-fielding” NIRSpec spectra Throughput correction of ^ Need a “throughput” data cube (for each filter/grating combination) Output (assuming a source with flat spectrum) l ---> x ---> y ---> l ---> l ---> Goal: to correct for the total instrumental throughput variations, both as a function of wavelength (e.g. optics transmission, blaze function) and field angle (e.g. DQE, vignetting).

Contributions to the “Throughput correction” reflectivity of all mirrors: f(l), f(x,y) transmission curves of filters: f(l) blaze function of gratings: f(l), f(x,y) large-scale response of detector (L-flat): f(l), f(x,y) All contributions are measured at component level, and built into a physical/optical instrument model. Once NIRSpec is assembled, they cannot be measured individually. However, once a shutter has been specified, all of them are - in principle - deterministic, and can be accurately modeled. Using the instrument model, all these effects will be corrected simultaneously. But wait……

The bummer: chromatic slit loss Fixed slit size, but variable PSF width……. 1 mm 3 mm 5 mm …… causes “flaring” and intensity gradient: A “default” correction for e.g. a perfectly centered point source can be included in throughput correction. The user needs to optimize this correction later….. l --->

An outline of the NIRSpec pipeline RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics, & “default” chromatic slit loss) MSA CONFIG. & DISTORTION MAP GW TELEMETRY GEOMETRIC DISTORTION (spatial) FINAL l CALIBRATION (dispersion solution) “DELTA” CHROMATIC SLIT LOSS CORR. ABSOLUTE FLUX CALIBRATION EXTRACT 1-D SPECTRUM SUBTRACT BACKGROUND FINAL 1D SPECTRUM FLATFIELD REF. CUBE GRATING EQUATION PHOTFLAM KEYWORD BIAS/DARK REF. FRAMES “P-FLAT” REF. FRAME LINEARITY CORR. LINEARITY (Assuming no l-dependence) One window for every open shutter…. (output is re-sampled grid)

Rectifying NIRSpec Spectra Slit is curved (function of field angle) Lines of constant l spread over multiple pixel columns l1 l2 li Use “Drizzle” technique as possible approach for coordinate transform Need rebinning before final spectrum is extracted l1 l2 li

“Delta” correction for chromatic slit loss - depends on source shape and position within shutter must be user-controlled l1 l2 li l1 l2 li Collapse to 1-d spectrum - depends on source extent and background subtraction must be user-controlled For quick-look analysis, pipeline subtracts TBD “default” background

An outline of the NIRSpec pipeline RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics, & “default” chromatic slit loss) MSA CONFIG. & DISTORTION MAP GW TELEMETRY GEOMETRIC DISTORTION (spatial) FINAL l CALIBRATION (dispersion solution) “DELTA” CHROMATIC SLIT LOSS CORR. ABSOLUTE FLUX CALIBRATION EXTRACT 1-D SPECTRUM SUBTRACT BACKGROUND FINAL 1D SPECTRUM FLATFIELD REF. CUBE GRATING EQUATION PHOTFLAM KEYWORD BIAS/DARK REF. FRAMES “P-FLAT” REF. FRAME LINEARITY CORR. LINEARITY “CALWEBB” (Assuming no l-dependence) (one window for every open shutter…. ) (output is re-sampled grid) “CALNIRSpecA” (one spectrum for every open shutter) “CALNIRSpecB” (defined by user or average) (defined by user) (erg/cm2/s/Å, sampled within variable slit aperture)