Phase 3 Treatment Experienced

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
Advertisements

Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir +/- RBV in GT1 PEARL-III.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir + RBV in GT1 SAPPHIRE-II.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-1 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Source: Afdhal N, et al. N.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Source: Afdhal N, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks in HCV GT1 ION-3 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Kowdley K, et al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT1 or GT4 and HIV Coinfection ION-4 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Experienced GT1 with Cirrhosis SIRIUS Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Bourliere.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir + RBV in Sofosbuvir-Experienced HCV GT1 Retreatment of Sofosbuvir Failures Phase 2 Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) + RBV in GT1 SAPPHIRE-II Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV GT 4 Egyptian Ancestry Trial Phase 2 Ruane PJ, et al. J Hepatol. 2015;62:
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT1 or GT4 and HIV Coinfection ION-4 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Nelson DR,
FUSION  Design  Objectives –SVR ≥ 20% compared with historical control of 25%, 97% power –Difference of SVR > 20% between the 2 groups, 82% power SOF.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 500 N = 100 W12 Placebo > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen.
 Design  Objective –Difference in SVR ≥ 40% between the 2 groups, 99% power SOF + RBV Placebo Randomisation 3 : 1* Double blind HCV infection Genotype.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 120 W12 SOF + RBV > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 2 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen Compensated cirrhosis.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Elbasvir-Grazoprevir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1, 4 or 6 C-EDGE Treatment Naïve (TN) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve.
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W8 W12
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in GT 1-6 with Renal Disease EXPEDITION-4
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in DAA-Naïve GT 1-6 POLARIS-2
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in GT 3 and Cirrhosis POLARIS-3
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in Genotype 1-3 Trial
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir (Epclusa)
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Compensated cirrhosis **
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Retreatment study: SOF/VEL + RBV in prior NS5A failure - Phase II
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W12
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Failure to achieve SVR on No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
QUARTZ II-III : OBV/PTV/r + SOF RBV in genotype 2 or 3
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double blind W12
SOF/VEL + GS-9857 in genotypes 1-6 Phase II
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve (unfavorable baseline treatment characteristics) Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- 3rd DAA in HCV Genotype 1 NIAID SYNERGY: Genotype.
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Injection Drug Use
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4 PEARL-I
Design W12 Randomisation * Open-label
GS-US Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 in genotype 1 - Phase II
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
GS-US Study: SOF/VEL + GS in genotype 2, 3, 4 or 6 - Phase II
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin for 8 or 12 weeks in HCV GT1 ION-3
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
MAGELLAN-3 Study: GLE/PIB + SOF + RBV in patients who failed GLE/PIB
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir in Genotype 1b HALLMARK-DUAL Study
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir-Grazoprevir + Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1 or 3 C-SWIFT Poordad F, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract O006.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 2 Treatment Experienced (with Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
SOF/VEL ± RBV in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis
Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 PROVE3
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Presentation transcript:

Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1 Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Study Features POLARIS-1 Trial Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 12 weeks in NS5A-inhibitor-experienced patients with GT 1-6 chronic HCV infection Setting: - 108 sites in United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, France, Germany, and United Kingdom Entry Criteria - Age >18 years - Chronic HCV (any genotype) - HCV RNA ≥10,000 IU/mL at screening - Prior treatment failure with DAA that contained NS5A inhibitor - Patients with compensated cirrhosis allowed Primary End-Point: SVR12 Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir- Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Study Design 12 24 Week GT 1-6 with NS5A inhibitor experience* n = 415 Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir- Voxilaprevir N=263 SVR12 Placebo N=152 SVR12 GT 1 patients randomized 2:1 ratio (active:placebo). Stratified by presence of cirrhosis (target ≥30%). Genotypes 2-6 were assigned to active arm (and not randomized). Placebo recipients were eligible for deferred treatment with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir Drug Dosing Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir (400/100/100 mg): fixed dose combination; one pill once daily Placebo: one pill once daily Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Baseline Characteristics SOF-VEL-VOX (n = 263) Placebo ( n =152) Age, mean (range) 58 (27-84) 59 (29-80) Male, n (%) 200 (76) 121 (80) White, n (%) 211 (80) 124 (82) HCV genotype—no. (%) 1 1a 1b 1 (other) 2 3 4 5 6 150 (57) 101 (38) 45 (17) 4 (2) 5 (2) 78 (30) 22 (8) 1 (<1) 6 (2) 150 (99) 117 (77) 31 (20) 2 (1) Mean HCV RNA, log10 IU/mL (range) 6.3 ± 0.7 6.3 ± 0.6 IL28B CC, n (%) 47 (18) 27 (18) Cirrhosis, n (%) 121 (46) 51 (34) Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Prior NS5A Treatment 133/263 70/263 30/263 33/263 Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Results POLARIS-1: SVR12 Results by Genotype 97/101 45/45 5/5 74/78 20/22 1/1 6/6 Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Results POLARIS-1: SVR 12 by Cirrhosis Status 253/263 140/142 113/121 Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Results POLARIS-1: SVR 12 by Cirrhosis Status 6 Relapses 1 On-treatment failure 2 Withdrew consent 1 Lost to follow-up 6 Relapses 1 On-treatment failure 1 Withdrew consent 1 Withdrew consent 1 Lost to follow-up 253/263 140/142 113/121 Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Results POLARIS-1: SVR12 by Baseline Resistance-Associated Substitutions (RAS) 42/43 199/205 2/2 9/9 120/124 70/72 83% of patients had baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs); 79% had NS5A RASs. None who relapsed had treatment-emergent RASs. Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in NS5A-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1: Adverse Events Adverse Event (AE) SOF-VEL-VOX (n = 263) Placebo (n = 152) Discontinuation due to AE—no. (%) 1 (<1) § 3 (2) Serious AEs—no. (%) 5 (2) 7 (5) Deaths—no. Any AE in ≥5% of patients—no. (%) Headache Fatigue Diarrhea Nausea 66 (25) 56 (21) 47 (18) 37 (14) 26 (17) 30 (20) 19 (12) 12 (8) Laboratory AEs Grade 3 or Above—no. (%) 18 (6.9%) 22 (14.5%) § One patient in active arm discontinued due to angioedema attributed to ramipril. Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in DAA-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-1 and POLARIS-4: Conclusions Conclusions: “Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir taken for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response among patients across HCV genotypes in whom treatment with a DAA regimen had previously failed.” Source: Bourlière M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134-46.