Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Advertisements

Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
1 Learning to Do the Mathematical Work of Teaching Deborah Loewenberg Ball Hyman Bass, Tim Boerst, Yaa Cole, Judith Jacobs, Yeon Kim, Jennifer Lewis, Laurie.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Developing Mathematics PD Sessions: Planning Conversations and Instructional Decisions that Lead to Improved MKT in District Leaders. National Council.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) WMC State Mathematics Conference Green Lake, Wisconsin Leadership Pre-conference April 30, 2008 Beth Schefelker,
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
Wisconsin Mathematics Council Annual Conference Green Lake, WI 2011 Melissa Hedges, MathematicsTeaching Specialist, MTSD Beth Schefelker, Mathematics Teaching.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Problem Solving, Protocols and Practice through the Ages Wisconsin Mathematics Council Wisconsin Mathematics Council 41 st Annual Conference 41 st Annual.
Accommodations for Students with Special Needs in Mathematics: Are They Really Helping to Improve Mathematics Understanding Wisconsin Mathematics Council.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Kevin McLeod Connie Laughlin Hank Kepner Beth Schefelker Mary Mooney Math Teacher Leader Meeting, April 5 th and 7 th The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Quantitative Analysis (Q.A): Surfacing Operation Sense in Problem Solving Connie Laughlin, Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) New Wisconsin Promise Conference Madison, Wisconsin January 14, 2009 Beth Schefelker, MTSMary Mooney, MTS.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), Using Properties to Reason through Tough Questions.
Representation: Getting at the heart of mathematical understanding Wisconsin Mathematics Council Green Lake Annual Conference Thursday, May 6, 2010 Sarah.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Meeting Philadelphia, PA Thursday, April 26, 2012 Connie Laughlin, UW-Milwaukee, Milwaukee WI Beth Schefelker,
Effective Conversations That Lead To Effective Instruction: Using A Portfolio Process to Structure Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Beth Schefelker,
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Capturing Growth in Teacher Mathematical Knowledge The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Eleventh Annual Conference 26 January 2007 Dr. DeAnn.
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Thinking about the ways students encounter mathematics.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), Using Properties to Reason through Tough Questions.
Planning for Discourse in the Classroom Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin December 9 th and 16 th, 2010 MTL.
CCSSO – Cross-State Mathematics Teacher Leaders: IA, MT, ND, SD Facilitator Name and Location Strategies for Modifying Existing Math Tasks to Increase.
Good Morning!   Please find a seat at a table that has materials.   We hope you have your Common Core Math binder with you. If you don’t, please go.
Mathematical Modeling: An Evolving Perspective
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Examining Productive Talk
New Wisconsin Promise Conference: Closing the Achievement Gap
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
Instructional Design and Lesson Planning
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
Exploring Probability Through Yahtzee Extensions
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Serena Alderson Manager of School Partnerships Carnegie Learning, Inc
Presentation transcript:

Are All Math Tasks Created Equally? Lee Ann Pruske Connie Laughlin pruskelx@milwaukee.k12.wi.us laughlin.connie@gmail.com Wisconsin Math Council Annual Conference Green Lake, WI May 2010 www.mmp.uwm.edu Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

We Are Learning To . . . Understand and identify the cognitive demand levels of mathematical tasks. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Success Criteria We will be successful if at the end of the session, we can understand and identify the features of the four levels of cognitive demand of mathematical tasks, and begin to understand where the tasks are located in your textbook materials. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Building Academic Vocabulary Discuss with your shoulder partner what you think Cognitive Demand is. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Cognitive Demand… “The kind and level of thinking required of students in order to successfully engage with and solve the task.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000) Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation At about 5 min now

Reading: “Analyzing Mathematics Instructional Tasks” Individually read the entire article. Each person share one idea from the article at your table. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation 10-15 min with debrief Decide what the debrief is and which big ideas should be surfaced.

Four Levels of Cognitive Demand in Mathematical Tasks Low Level Cognitive Demands Memorization Tasks Procedures Without Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks High Level Cognitive Demands Procedures With Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks Doing Mathematics Tasks

Table Group Sort Activity Lay out the 4 green category cards Deal out the 8 blue Mathematical Task Cards to everyone in the group. Refer to the “Task Analysis Guide” for criteria. As you place your Mathematical Task cards into a category, explain your reasoning. Help each other justify the placements. 10 min to sort 15 min to debrief.

Explanation of Categorization Cognitive Demands and Features Sample Tasks Task Level of Cognitive Demand Explanation of Categorization Features A Doing Mathematics There is no pathway suggested by the task. The focus is on looking for the underlying mathematical structure. Requires an explanation Uses manipulatives Involves multiple steps Uses a diagram Handout key to groups

Materials Discussion Where do you find high level cognitive demand questions in your curricular materials? Turn and talk to a neighbor. 5 min discussion hand out SF green sheet

Success Criteria We will be successful if at the end of the session, we can understand and identify the features of the four levels of cognitive demand of mathematical tasks, and begin to understand where the tasks are located in your textbook materials. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Take Aways… As you walk away, think about these three questions: Which of the four levels of cognitive demand are you most comfortable with? Which one do you understand the least? Something I want to know more about is…? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Resources can be found at Thank you for coming! Lee Ann Pruske Connie Laughlin pruskelx@milwaukee.k12.wi.us laughlin.connie@gmail.com Resources can be found at www.mmp.uwm.edu Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Mathematical Tasks Framework Figure 1.3 TASKS As they appear in curricular/ instructional materials As set up by teachers As implemented by students Student Learning A representation of how mathematical tasks unfold during classroom instruction. (Stein & Smith, 1998, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School)