FIMCAR Global Strategy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
Advertisements

Child safety with respect to vehicle protection and booster seats - a proposal for a CRF for children > 4yo 1 Informal document GRSP (55 th GRSP,
Injuries Reported in Frontal Impacts in Swedish Accident Data Presentation to GRSP Informal Group on Frontal Impact March 10, 2009 FI-4-3.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
50th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, December 2011, agenda item.
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman FI
ECE Regulation N°129 17/12/201354th Session GRSP December th session of GRSP December 2013 Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
1 International Harmonized Research Activities March, 2001 IHRA Steering Committee Presentation to WP-29.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
 Road Safety the European Union Policy Carla Hess European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport Road.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
General Safety Regulation ACEA discussion paper Renzo Cicilloni Director Safety Paris, June 2009 AEBS/LDWS
Forty-second session of GRSP December REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments Proposal submitted by France Informal.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Pre kick off meeting 1 1 NCHRP_22_24 January CME Activities 1.Define reporting procedures for simulations (data output, variables, etc) 2.Define.
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008,
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 5: PEER REVIEW.
RBM and Asset Strategy.
EEVC WG20 European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee 12 th December, 2006 Slide 1 EEVC WG20 and WG12 Rear Impact Test Procedure Development Programme Presented.
46th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (46th session, December 2009,
Sub-theme 4 Building blocks for NSDS 3 REPORT BACK National Skills Conference 2008 “Reflection on a decade of skills development for the future”:
Evolution of UNECE R29 OICA proposal
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008, agenda.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002
A practical methodology for technology needs assessment: Introduction and overview of preliminary issues Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and.
Netherlands’ presentation for Informal Group on Frontal Impact of GRSP 6 Oct UNECE Reg.94 - Past, Present & Future Presentation by the expert from.
European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Developing an European Interior Headform Test Procedure T. Langner on behalf of EEVC WG 13 19th International.
WorldSID 50 th Update Klaus Bortenschlager PDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and Biomechanics on behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 44 th GRSP Session.
51 st GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
EECV WG20, Progress, December 2003 EEVC WG20 Rear Impact test procedure(s) and the mitigation of neck injury Progress, December 2003 Informal document.
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
WORKING GROUP 18 Jean-Yves LE COZ Chairman CHILD OCCUPANT SAFETY Informal document No. GRSP
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Assessment of EPQ What is assessed? AO1 Managing the project AO2 Use resources Where’s the evidence? Production log – aims of project, detailed project.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC.
Stages of Research and Development
Building Business Transformation Capabilities Our perspective on the building blocks, structure and critical success factors to impact change Gillian.
Make or Buy transport.
Burden of Disease and Health Economics: Friends or Foes?
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Forming a Strategy for your Business.
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Regulation 129 CLEPA response to
Principles of Information Systems Eighth Edition
Seismic Design Impact to
Internal assessment criteria
CHILD OCCUPANT SAFETY WORKING GROUP 18 Jean-Yves LE COZ Chairman
Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen
FIMCAR Project Description Proposal for Cooperation with GRSP IG FI
IESBA CAG Meeting New York March 6, 2017
Manager of Policy & Intergovernmental Relations
Development of a Suitable Test Protocol
INTRO TO HIGH PERFORMANCE OFFICIATING
IG Frontal Impact IWGFI
Status report GRSP IWG FI
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Industry Homework from AEB 02
52nd GRSP, 11 – 14 Decemer 2012, agenda item 14
Harmonization of Crash Regulations in Korea
THE RESEARCH PROCESS.
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Scene setter European Commission DG Environment
Submitted by the expert from Consumers International
52nd GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI
Presentation transcript:

FIMCAR Global Strategy GRSP IG FI 20101014

Global Strategies for FIMCAR Proposed Working plan Define compatibility characteristics based on accident analysis Develop assessment procedures Establish criteria for rating the assessment procedures Select final procedure and finalise test protocol

List of Open Issues From WG 15 Status in FIMCAR in-depth analysis completed, information from GRSP available, benefit analysis to start later in project Global Issues Further accident analysis and benefit analysis to update information on changing vehicle fleet

List of Open Issues From WG 15 Global Issues 2. Finalise the test severity (EES) for regulation test. Status in FIMCAR 2. Test severity should not reduce compartment strength – need to define mass effect (more details later)

List of Open Issues From WG 15 Global Issues 3. Finalise assessment criteria for regulation test. Status in FIMCAR 3. Assessment Criteria under development

List of Open Issues From WG 15 Global Issues 4. Finalise objective assessment proce-dures to analyse results of car-to-car tests Status in FIMCAR 4. Test database complete as a tool, work on the analysis of car-to-car tests is planned

List of Open Issues From WG 15 Global Issues 5. Identify critical injury mechanisms (in particular relevance of thorax injuries in high deceleration pulse type accidents) Status in FIMCAR Accident analysis highlighted thorax as most common AIS 2+ injury Input from THORAX project expected for the injury mechanism

List of Open Issues From WG 15 Global Issues 6. Finalise a compatibi-lity scale for a rating system. Status in FIMCAR 6. Not first priority within FIMCAR

Global Priorities from FIMCAR and Previous Work Assessment requirements   Structural Interaction Front End Force / Deformation (Consisting of) Compartment integrity Restraint system Alignment Load spreading (load paths / connections) Deformation forces of frontal structures Energy absorption management Sufficient for single vehicle accident Enhanced for light vehicles in vehicle to vehicle accident (Assess over range of pulses) Test restraint capacity Priorities for FIMCAR 1  1 2 Strong Evidence in the existing and previous studies Acceleration injuries need to be addressed, small car issues hard to identify in current data Current R94 / EuroNCAP gains must be maintained accident data needs further analysis for car-car Acceleration injuries need to be addressed, expand test types to test sensing systems

How Frontal Impact and Compatibility Priorities are being addressed in FIMCAR No. Assessment requirements Structural Interaction Front End Force / Deformation (Consisting of) Compartment integrity Restraint system Alignment Load spreading (load paths / connections) Deformation forces of frontal structures Energy absorption management Sufficient for single vehicle accident Enhanced for light vehicles in vehicle to vehicle accident (Assess over range of pulses) Test restraint capacity FWRB   FWDB ODB PDB MDB (fixed mass/speed) MDB (variable mass/speed) FIMCAR has high priority on establishing structural interaction assessments using both a FW and Offset test – Choice of barrier types under investigation

How Frontal Impact and Compatibility Priorities are being addressed in FIMCAR No. Assessment requirements Structural Interaction Front End Force / Deformation (Consisting of) Compartment integrity Restraint system Alignment Load spreading (load paths / connections) Deformation forces of frontal structures Energy absorption management Sufficient for single vehicle accident Enhanced for light vehicles in vehicle to vehicle accident (Assess over range of pulses) Test restraint capacity FWRB   FWDB ODB PDB MDB (fixed mass/speed) MDB (variable mass/speed) Vehicles must have minimum energy absorption requirements, likely resolved with FW test. Force level issues rated as priority 2 and are unlikely to be resolved.

How Frontal Impact and Compatibility Priorities are being addressed in FIMCAR No. Assessment requirements Structural Interaction Front End Force / Deformation (Consisting of) Compartment integrity Restraint system Alignment Load spreading (load paths / connections) Deformation forces of frontal structures Energy absorption management Sufficient for single vehicle accident Enhanced for light vehicles in vehicle to vehicle accident (Assess over range of pulses) Test restraint capacity FWRB   FWDB ODB PDB MDB (fixed mass/speed) MDB (variable mass/speed) FIMCAR will maintain an offset test with sufficient test severity as current levels. Special actions for small vehicles are still being investigated by accident studies

How Frontal Impact and Compatibility Priorities are being addressed in FIMCAR No. Assessment requirements Structural Interaction Front End Force / Deformation (Consisting of) Compartment integrity Restraint system Alignment Load spreading (load paths / connections) Deformation forces of frontal structures Energy absorption management Sufficient for single vehicle accident Enhanced for light vehicles in vehicle to vehicle accident (Assess over range of pulses) Test restraint capacity FWRB   FWDB ODB PDB MDB (fixed mass/speed) MDB (variable mass/speed) Full Width test is proposed to assess restraint capacity and address acceleration injuries found in accident analysis Combination of tests is advised for sensor and restraint performance evaluation

Planned FIMCAR Results Full Width test will be proposed In order to create a high deceleration pulse Use of deformable barrier to be determined Metric for structural alignment to be proposed Possible concept for frontal force level requirements Offset Barrier test will be proposed In order to test compartment integrity PDB is only barrier being investigated for load spreading evaluation Existing ODB will be maintained if PDB cannot meet necessary performance requirements

Planned FIMCAR Results MDB will be developed with a PDB barrier face structural evaluation criteria will be tied to PDB research MDB barrier can address mass ratio compatibility issues which are probably not fully addressed in the fixed barrier tests MDB may replace or complement fixed offset barrier