Node Selection in Distributed Sensor Networks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial point patterns and Geostatistics an introduction
Advertisements

Coverage in Wireless Sensor Network Phani Teja Kuruganti AICIP lab.
A Hierarchical Multiple Target Tracking Algorithm for Sensor Networks Songhwai Oh and Shankar Sastry EECS, Berkeley Nest Retreat, Jan
Hairong Qi, Associate Professor
Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks By C. K. Toh.
Decentralized Reactive Clustering in Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu April 26, 2015.
Fault-Tolerant Target Detection in Sensor Networks Min Ding +, Dechang Chen *, Andrew Thaeler +, and Xiuzhen Cheng + + Department of Computer Science,
Sensor Network 教育部資通訊科技人才培育先導型計畫. 1.Introduction General Purpose  A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a wireless network using sensors to cooperatively.
Coverage Estimation in Heterogeneous Visual Sensor Networks Mahmut Karakaya and Hairong Qi Advanced Imaging & Collaborative Information Processing Laboratory.
1 Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor networks: A Survey.
Volkan Cevher, Marco F. Duarte, and Richard G. Baraniuk European Signal Processing Conference 2008.
A Hierarchical Energy-Efficient Framework for Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 55, NO. 3, MAY.
The Impact of Spatial Correlation on Routing with Compression in WSN Sundeep Pattem, Bhaskar Krishnamachri, Ramesh Govindan University of Southern California.
Scalable Information-Driven Sensor Querying and Routing for ad hoc Heterogeneous Sensor Networks Maurice Chu, Horst Haussecker and Feng Zhao Xerox Palo.
Collaborative Signal Processing CS 691 – Wireless Sensor Networks Mohammad Ali Salahuddin 04/22/03.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha Presented by Ray Lam Oct 23, 2004.
1 Energy Efficient Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu 8/14/2015.
Data Selection In Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks Olawoye Oyeyele 11/24/2003.
Presented by Amira Ahmed El-Sharkawy Ibrahim.  There are six of eight turtle species in Ontario are listed as endangered, threatened or of special concern.
Vikramaditya. What is a Sensor Network?  Sensor networks mainly constitute of inexpensive sensors densely deployed for data collection from the field.
M-GEAR: Gateway-Based Energy-Aware Multi-Hop Routing Protocol
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha.
A novel gossip-based sensing coverage algorithm for dense wireless sensor networks Vinh Tran-Quang a, Takumi Miyoshi a,b a Graduate School of Engineering,
WMNL Sensors Deployment Enhancement by a Mobile Robot in Wireless Sensor Networks Ridha Soua, Leila Saidane, Pascale Minet 2010 IEEE Ninth International.
Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of.
Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Prolonging Network Lifetime and Ensuring Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Yong-hwan Kim Korea.
Sensor Selection in Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks Olawoye Oyeyele 10/10/2003.
SENSOR NETWORKS BY Umesh Shah Mayuresh Patil G P Reddy GUIDES Prof U.B.Desai Prof S.N.Merchant.
1 Collaborative Processing in Sensor Networks Lecture 2 - Mobile-agent-based Computing Hairong Qi, Associate Professor Electrical Engineering and Computer.
1 Collaborative Processing in Sensor Networks Lecture 5 - Visual Coverage Hairong Qi, Associate Professor Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University.
An Energy Efficient Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks Seema Bandyopadhyay and Edward J. Coyle Presented by Yu Wang.
Mobile Agent Migration Problem Yingyue Xu. Energy efficiency requirement of sensor networks Mobile agent computing paradigm Data fusion, distributed processing.
A Dead-End Free Topology Maintenance Protocol for Geographic Forwarding in Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 60, no. 11, November.
ELECTIONEL ECTI ON ELECTION: Energy-efficient and Low- latEncy sCheduling Technique for wIreless sensOr Networks Shamim Begum, Shao-Cheng Wang, Bhaskar.
By Naeem Amjad 1.  Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2.
Decentralized Energy- Conserving and Coverage- Preserving Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
The Restricted Matched Filter for Distributed Detection Charles Sestok and Alan Oppenheim MIT DARPA SensIT PI Meeting Jan. 16, 2002.
Evaluating Wireless Network Performance David P. Daugherty ITEC 650 Radford University March 23, 2006.
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges
Data Dissemination Based on Ant Swarms for Wireless Sensor Networks S. Selvakennedy, S. Sinnappan, and Yi Shang IEEE 2006 CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS and NETWORKING.
Simulation of DeReClus Yingyue Xu September 6, 2003.
U of Minnesota DIWANS'061 Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and.
Ben Miller.   A distributed algorithm is a type of parallel algorithm  They are designed to run on multiple interconnected processors  Separate parts.
I-Hsin Liu1 Event-to-Sink Directed Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks Alper Bereketli and Ozgur B. Akan Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering.
Distributed Signal Processing Woye Oyeyele March 4, 2003.
Abstract 1/2 Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) having limited power resource report sensed data to the Base Station (BS) that requires high energy usage.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Efficient Placement and Dispatch of Sensors in a Wireless Sensor Network You-Chiun Wang, Chun-Chi Hu, and Yu-Chee Tseng IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.
Energy-Aware Target Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Yi Zou and Krishnendu Chakrabarty IEEE (PerCom’03) Speaker: Hsu-Jui Chang.
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan Presented.
-1/16- Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks C.-K. Toh, Georgia Institute of Technology IEEE.
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
Minimum spanning tree diameter estimation in random sensor networks in fractal dimension Students: Arthur Romm Daniel Kozlov Supervisor: Dr.Zvi Lotker.
In the name of God.
Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Department of Computer Science
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan Presented.
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Su Yi Babak Azimi-Sadjad Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Coverage and Connectivity in Sensor Networks
On Achieving Maximum Network Lifetime Through Optimal Placement of Cluster-heads in Wireless Sensor Networks High-Speed Networking Lab. Dept. of CSIE,
ADVISOR : Professor Yeong-Sung Lin STUDENT : Hung-Shi Wang
Reducing Total Network Power Consumption
The Coverage Problem in a Wireless Sensor Network
Protocols.
Hongchao Zhou, Fei Liu, Xiaohong Guan
Overview: Chapter 2 Localization and Tracking
Protocols.
Presentation transcript:

Node Selection in Distributed Sensor Networks Olawoye Oyeyele 03/04/2004

Outline Motivation Aims and Objectives Modeling Assumptions Selection Algorithm Simulation Conclusions

Motivation Densely deployed wireless sensor networks consume energy through communications Bandwidth may not be sufficient for data transmission in such networks Subset of data may provide acceptable detection Computational burden of processing all available data may be prohibitive. Network may be short-lived

Aims & Objectives Select a subset of sensors (hence data) for detection Consistently achieve coverage of entire region Do not compromise detection performance Minimize complexity of selection algorithm Low Energy consumption Small Latency Achieve fault-tolerance through redundancy

Modeling Assumptions Target can be modeled as an isotropic radiating source with power law decay Data captured by nearby sensors are similar, therefore redundant Spatial dependence can be estimated Sensor network is a sampling problem in which the spatial process is sampled spatio-temporally Nodes are capable of power control

Typical Environment Nodes fail unpredictably High Probability of attack from weather and other agents Nodes operate autonomously

Sensor Network Properties Consists of battery operated sensor nodes Deployed randomly on the field in large numbers Resource constrained sensor nodes power, computation, communication No networking infrastructure

Systematic Sampling Sample the sensor field as systematically as possible within discs of radius r Exploit spatial dependence to select sensors

Estimating Spatial Dependence The Semi-variogram is the major tool used in estimating spatial dependence Is the semi-variance at lag h, h The lag i.e distance between locations si and sj yi Value of variable y at location si yj Value of variable y at location sj N(h) Number of pairs of observed data points separated by lag h

The Semi-variogram Shows the semi-variance plotted vs. lag for different lags. At a certain lag (distance) called the Range, the data measurements cease to be correlated. Many theoretical models in use; Power-law, exponential, Gaussian, spherical etc.

The Semi-variogram

Power-law Variogram A power law variogram implies infinite variance Solution: select arbitrary value for ‘Range’ r. Only requirement is r < rs and r < rt where rs and rt are the sensing and maximum transmission range of sensor node

Selection Algorithm Estimate “Range” or “Correlation Length” and use as a basis for selecting sensors Simple Packet containing the source node’s remnant energy is sent RM RM – Remaining Energy 32 bit Number representing the remnant energy on the Node

Properties of spatial selection Ensures that data is collected from all over the area covered by the network Reduces communication cost Chosen ‘Range’ used to select sensors Range may be seen as limit of spatial dependence Range can be chosen to ensure coverage and connectivity Achieves high fault-tolerance and may work well in harsh environments

State Machine SLEEP NEGOTIATE ACTIVE

Pseudo-Code createNodes(number); deploy nodes(AREA); //transmit up to Range using appropriate energy level nodes[i].transmit(corRange) Do { SpatialSelect() if nodes[i].status = ACTIVE if nodes[j] == nodes[i].neighbor && nodes[j].status == ACTIVE nodes[j].receive(); if nodes[j].energy <= nodes[i].energy nodes[j].status = SLEEP for a predetermined time; else if nodes[j].energy > nodes[i].energy nodes[j].status = ACTIVE for predetermined time; end end SpatialSelect(); } while (predetermined time) //executed after predetermined time

Applicable Scenarios Data Selection Sensor Selection Refers to the determination of sites where data will be collected Sensor Selection The problem of choosing the sensors to be used in detection Algorithm may be applied at various points in the lifetime of a network Post-deployment Change of cluster – head etc.

Simulation Parameters Operation Energy Dissipated Transmitter/Receiver Electronics 50nJ Transmit Amplifier 100pJ/bit/m2 Parameter Value Transmission Rate 100kbps Number of Nodes 200 Area 50m by 50m Topology Uniformly Random

Simulation Results Energy consumption Detector Performance (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Demonstrate that chosen subset achieves coverage and connectivity

Sensor Network

Node Configuration : Range = 1

Node Configuration: Range 3

Node Configuration : Range = 5

Selected Sensors vs. Range Values

Energy Depletion with Time

Energy Consumption

ROC performance

Discussion Spatial Selection promises to be a robust selection technique Consistent coverage and connectivity, fairly stable performance (ROC) Simplified technique Increased network lifetime Flexible – offers two design parameters Range Value Sleep Time Performs better than Randomization or pure Random Selection

References Clark Isobel, ‘Practical Geostatistics’ (on the web) Xu Yingyue, Hairong Qi, ’Decentralized Reactive Clustering in Collaborative Processing Using Different Computing Paradigms’ Sestok C.K., Maya R. Said, Alan V. Oppenheim, ’Randomized Data Selection in Detection with Applications to Distributed Signal Processing’,Proceedings of the IEEE, September, 2003 Dalenius T., Jaroslav Hajek, Stefan Zubrzycki,’On plane sampling and Related Geometrical Problems’,Fourth Berkeley Symposium, 1961. Ripley Brian D.,’Spatial Statistics’,John Wiley and Sons, 1981.