IF Separator Design of RAON

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Rare RI Ring Facility at RIKEN RI Beam Factory M. Wakasugi, and Rare RI Ring Collaborators RIKEN, Nishina Center, Japan ARIS2014.
Advertisements

Status of the Rare Isotope Science Project
A New DA and TM Based Approach to Design Air-Core Magnets Shashikant Manikonda Taylor Model Methods VII, Dec 14 th -17 th, 2011, Key West, Florida.
The fission of a heavy fissile nucleus ( A, Z ) is the splitting of this nucleus into 2 fragments, called primary fragments A’ 1 and A’ 2. They are excited.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
1 An Introduction to Ion-Optics Series of Five Lectures JINA, University of Notre Dame Sept. 30 – Dec. 9, 2005 Georg P. Berg.
APS-DNP Fall20041 Design Studies for RIA Fragment Separators A.M. Amthor National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University Department.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
SUPERB Separator for Unique Products of Experiments with Radioactive Beams Matt Amthor Bucknell University ReA12 Recoil Separator Workshop – July 12, 2014.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
M. Hausmann for the FRIB Fragment Separator Collaboration FRIB Separator: Open Questions.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
23 July 2010FLNR Dubna Summer Students Practice Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, Dubna 2010 JINR, Dubna 2010 Studies with radioactive ion.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
RITU and the new separator at Jyväskylä J. Uusitalo, J. Sarén, M. Leino RITU and γ-groups University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Implantation rates at the focal plane of Super-FRS Some Simulations for AIDA Detectors.
Hall C - 12 GeV pCDR Max. Central Momentum 11 GeV/c 9 GeV/c Min. Scattering Angle 5.5 deg 10 deg Momentum Resolution.15% -.2% Solid Angle 2.1 msr 4.4 msr.
The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. RIA R&D is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
IF/RF 팀 추진현황 5 월 23 일, 2013 년, 충북제천 김종원. Conceptual Layout of the Accelerator Complex RF system: Solid state amplifier for sc-cavities LLRF (low level.
Overview of the Search for New Isotopes and New Isomers at RIKEN RI Beam Factory T. Kubo, RIKEN Nishina Center Presented on June 4, conference,
Accelerator Laboratory, Physics Department (JYFL) University of Jyväskylä P.O. Box 35 (YFL) FI Jyväskylä Finland MARA recoil-mass separator at JYFL.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Ancillary/Complementary detectors for the AD at LNL.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
Simulation of Particle Trajectories for RIKEN Rare-RI Ring Nishina Center, RIKEN SUZUKI Hiroshi Nov. / 11 / 2011.
Yoshitaka Yamaguchi Rare-RI Ring A/Z=3 Design of Rare-RI Ring - measurable with one particle - 1ms for measurement time.
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014
Super-FRS Lattice with Cos  multipoles
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
▪ Issues after KOBRA review meeting
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
CELLION Technical Report
JLEIC Forward Ion Detection Region
Large Booster and Collider Ring
On the ARIEL Pre-separator
Design of the MANX experiment
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
Beam dynamics of Super-FRS and MM requirements
Vamos + Exogam Spectrometer
EffiCAS Efficient Facility for Ions at CAS
JLEIC Detector Simulation Forward Ion Detection
A summary of world-wide test beam facilities
Collimation for beta-beams
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Recent Highlights and Future Plans at VAMOS
SC ISOL Linac of KoRIA Tae-Sun Park (SKKU).
Status and perspectives of the LNS-FRIBS facility
Transfer Line for EIC.
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Alternative Ion Injector Design
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

IF Separator Design of RAON Chong Cheoul, Yun IF-RF Team

Contents Design requirements Optics calculation by GICOSY code include fringing field from our magnet design - Pre separator - Main separator - HEBT Simulation for separation and PID - MOCDI calculation for pre separator - LISE++ calculation for main separator Summary and future plan

Design requirements Requirements : 2 stage separator → Pre separator : Separation of Primary beam and unwanted RI beam → Main separator : Particle Identification For 400 kW of High power beam → Beam dump at outside of Dipole magnet Long drift space for Beam dump and Radiation shielding wall → decrease momentum and angular acceptance Large acceptance for U-fission : ( > 100 mrad, > 7 %) → Warm bore radius 170 mm on the front half of Pre-separator Higher order correction at dispersive focal points for Wedge degrader High intensity RI beam, High transmission rate and High purity Magnet design presented by Dr. D. G. Kim Radiation activity around IF target presented by Dr. M. Kim

Layout of IF separator Pre-separator Main-separator Large chamber radiation shielding wall Large chamber - Target System - HTC Dipole and Q-magnet - High Power Beam dump At least two radiation shielding wall for high radiation

IF separator system HEBT : Primary beam delivery system ( 80 deg. 2nd order achromatic ) → U beam with multi charge state Pre-separator : Primary beam and unwanted RI beam separation → F1 : beam dump system → F3 : Wedge degrader Main-separator : PID for cocktail RI beams → ΔE – Bρ – TOF method → Z, A/Q

Configuration of HEBT 80 deg. 2nd achromatic beam line 4 dipole magnet with 20 degree and 6.5 m radius 8 Quadrupole magnets and 16 Hexapole magnets Large aperture for delivering multi charge state → 77+ ~ 82+ (Δp = ±2.5 %) → 90 mm of pole tip radius (2 cm/% @ FL1) Q-triplet for tuning beam size on IF target ~ 27 m of total length from FL0 to F0 1 cell

Simulation result for HEBT Particle distribution at the end of SCL2 by J. G. Hwang Simulation result of TRACK Multi charge state U beam with 77+ ~ 82+ Less than 2 mm Beam size on IF target FL0 FL1 FL2 F0 DYNAC program

Configuration of Pre-separator Two dispersive and two achromatic focal points. → Beam dump @ F1 and Wedge degrader @ F3 → F2 & F4 doubly achromatic focal points 4 dipole magnet with 30 deg. Maximum Bρ 10 T∙m 7 + 2 Quadrupole triplet magnet ( 550 mm – 900 mm – 550 mm ) → 170 mm of warm bore radius : PSQT1 ~ PSQT3 → 120 mm of warm bore radius : PSQT4 ~ PSQT7, MAQT1, MAQT2 2 External Hexapole magnet and 4 multi pole coil → External Hexapole : PSHEX1, PSHEX2 → Hexapole and multi coil : red color Last 2 Q-triplet magnet for matching Wedge Degrader Beam dump

Optics calculation for Pre separator 1st order calculation by GICOSY Angular acceptance 100 mrad in horizontal 80 mrad in vertical Momentum acceptance ~ 8 % Resolving power 2300 @ F1 3050 @ F3 (with assumption of 1 mm beam size) @ F1 with external hexapole magnet @ F3 with multi pole coil 2nd order correction is successful

MOCADI Simulation @ Beam dump 238U (200 MeV/u) + C (1.9 mm) Projectile fragmentation 238U 132Sn 87+ ~ 92 + Beam dump U fission Beam dump MOCADI result of separation at F1 beam dump in the case of 132Sn for U – fission and in the case of 100Sn for projectile fragmentation Remove by the beam dump Beam dump Design of Beam dump is underway.

Configuration of Main Separator Two dispersive and two achromatic focal points → 2nd wedge degrader @ F6 4 dipole magnet with 30 degree and 6 m of radius 8 Q-triplet magnets and 8 multi pole coils → winding multi coil on cold tube → 120 mm of warm bore radius Two operation mode → Large acceptance mode → High resolution mode 2nd Wedge degrader

Main separator – Large acceptance mode Angular acceptance 90 mrad in horizontal 70 mrad in vertical Momentum acceptance ~ 8 % Resolving power 2700 @ F6 2700 @ F8 (with assumption of 1mm beam size) 2nd order correction is successful with use of multi pole coils

Main separator – high resolution mode Angular acceptance 50 mrad in horizontal 50 mrad in vertical Momentum acceptance ~ 6 % Resolving power 2650 @ F6 3650 @ F7 2650 @ F8 (with assumption of 1mm beam size )

LISE++ simulation for PID 5th dipole magnet F9 TOF : PPAC1 @ F5 – Plastic @ F9 ΔE : gas ion chamber @ F9 Bρ selection : 5th Dipole magnet → A/Q, Z Make a input file for LISE++ including Transfer matrix from GICSY calculation, slit system, and detector system PPAC, plastic, gas ion chamber.

LISE++ simulation for Projectile fragmentation 100Sn 112Sn 242 MeV/u + C (2.55 mm) Transmission rate ~ 54 % Production yield ~ 10 pps Z Wedge Degrader d/R = 0.3 (1.5 mm) @ F3 Wedge Degrader d/R = 0.2 (0.65 mm) @ F6 A/Q

LISE++ simulation for U fission 238U 200 MeV/u + C (1.9 mm) Transmission rate ~ 12 % Production yield ~ 105 pps 132Sn Z Wedge Degrader d/R = 0.3 (1.58 mm) @ F3 Wedge Degrader d/R = 0.2 (0.86 mm) @ F6 A/Q

Summary and Future plan Design IF separator for High beam power Large Momentum and angular acceptance with use of large aperture on the front half of Pre-separator → 100 mrad and 8 % Good separation of Primary beam and RI beam at Beam dump → D = 2.03 cm/% Two mode operation for Main separator → Large acceptance mode → High resolution mode Good PID in the case of 100Sn and 132Sn Future plan MOCADI and LISE++ simulation in the case of variable RI beam production → Separation of Primary beam and RI beam at beam dump → PID at main separator Design for Beam dump Development for High counting rate detector etc…..

112Sn (242 MeV/u) + C (2.55 mm) PID for 100Sn Wedge degrader @ F3 Bρ selection Proton Number Bρ selection + Z2 selection by 1st degrader Wedge degrader @ F3 Without Wedge degrader Neutron Number 112Sn (242 MeV/u) + C (2.55 mm) PID for 100Sn Proton Number Bρ selection + Z2 selection by 1st degrader + Z2 2nd selection by Wedge degrader @ F3 Wedge degrader @ F6 Neutron Number

238U(200 MeV/u) + C (1.99 mm) PID for 132Sn Wedge degrader @ F3 Bρ selection Proton Number Bρ selection + Z2 selection by 1st degrader Wedge degrader @ F3 Without Wedge degrader Neutron Number 238U(200 MeV/u) + C (1.99 mm) PID for 132Sn Proton Number Bρ selection + Z2 selection by 1st degrader + Z2 2nd selection by Wedge degrader @ F3 Wedge degrader @ F6 Neutron Number