TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Types of AVR Examples of replacement aortic valves: a) shows an aortic homograft, b) and c) show a xenograft, d) shows a ball and cage valve, e) shows.
Advertisements

Jeffrey W. Moses, MD Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City The State of TAVR -PARTNER: From Concept to Mortality.
” سبحانك لا علم لنا إلا ما علمتنا إنك أنت العليم الحكيم “
Percutaneous Therapy of Pulmonic and Mitral Valve Disease Atman P. Shah MD FACC FSCAI Director, Coronary Care Unit Assistant Professor of Medicine The.
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Health-Related Quality of Life After Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Results From.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
Matthew R. Reynolds, M.D., M.Sc. On Behalf of the PARTNER Investigators Lifetime Cost Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared.
Use of Psoas Muscle Size as a Frailty Assessment Tool for Open and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Raghavendra Paknikar BS Jeffrey Friedman BS David.
Specialized Atrial Fibrillation Clinic reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation Jeroen ML Hendriks, MSc Robert.
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
RITA-3 Is this a benign lesion in a benign condition? Who Needs Angioplasty in 2008? Stable Angina Stable Angina Keith A A Fox Professor of Cardiology.
Trancatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Howard C. Herrmann, MD on behalf of The PARTNER II Trial Investigators SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable.
EVEREST II Study Design Multicenter Randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either percutaneous or conventional surgery for the repair or replacement of the mitral.
Eric J Robinson, M.D. Cardiologist April 25, 2015
EXPANDING INDICATIONS OF TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE INTERVENTIONS. JACC CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION. DR.RAJAT GANDHI.
Greater New York Geriatric Cardiology Consortium: Valve Disease in Older Adults Allan Schwartz, MD Columbia University Medical Center New York Presbyterian.
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Lessons from PARTNER I (A & B) CRT, Washington DC, Feb 5, 2012
Patients the Surgeon Should Refer for TAVR
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
New Data from The PARTNER Trial
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
Clinical Trial Design for Second Generation TAVI - Academic View
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
Anita W. Asgar MD, FRCPC, FACC Montreal Heart Institute
University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Update on the Watchman Device CRT 2010 Washington, DC
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
European Geriatricians Knowledge on Aortic Valve Diseases and TAVI
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
Carotid Artery Stenosis
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
The Spanish Data Bank PEGASO M. Martínez-Sellés
University of Pennsylvania
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
The TREAT Study: Can Devices Lower Bleeding Rates?
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. On behalf of The PARTNER Investigators
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
Michael Mack, M.D. Dallas, TX February 21, 2010
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
James Hermiller, MD, FACC, FSCAI St Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
Risk Stratification of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Patients
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Aortic Valve Disease and Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement “The Latest Treatment Option” Sonia Scalf, RN, CVSN Structural Heat Nurse Coordinator.
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
PARTNER 2A Trial design: Intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis (STS PROM score 4-8%) were randomized to undergo either TAVR or SAVR, stratified.
Coronary Revascularization and TAVR
Mitral Valve Disease.
How and why this study may change my practice ?
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Sildenafil for Improving Outcomes in Patients With Corrected Valvular Heart Disease and Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension: A Multicenter, Double-Blind,
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Applying Classification of Recommendation and Level of Evidence
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences Inc Discussion will include unapproved and off-label devices, procedures, and indications Howard C. Herrmann, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Interventional Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories University of Pennsylvania Medical Center

30-40% Of Cardiologists’ AS Patients Go Untreated Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Percent of Cardiology Patients Treated No AVR AVR Under-treatment especially prevalent among patients managed by Primary Care physicians Update June 2008 Bouma B J et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart 1999;82:143-148 Iung B et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. European Heart Journal 2003;24:1231-1243 (*includes both Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation patients) Pellikka, Sarano et al. Outcome of 622 Adults with Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-Up. Circulation 2005 Charlson E et al. Decision-making and outcomes in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis2006;15:312-321 10 10

Reasons for Failure to Operate AVR Offered but Declined by Patient: Preferred medical management 30% Chose balloon valvuloplasty 23 Wanted comfort care 16 No reason given 30 Physicians Failed to Offer: No discussion AVR in chart 32 No reason in chart 14 Co-morbidity 33 Age 9 Age and co-morbidity 7 Clinically stable 5 Charlson et al, J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15:312

Cohort B: Standard Rx patients Freedom from Mortality (%) Mortality vs. STS Score <10 (n=56) 10-15 (n=78) >15 (n=44) Freedom from Mortality (%) P (log rank) = 0.013 Months 13

PARTNER Study Design 2 Parallel Trials: Individually Powered n= 700 Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis ASSESSMENT: High Risk AVR Candidate 3105 Total Patients Screened Total = 1058 patients 2 Parallel Trials: Individually Powered High Risk n= 700 Inoperable n=358 Standard Therapy (usually BAV) ASSESSMENT: Transfemoral Access Not In Study TAVI Trans femoral Primary Endpoint: All Cause Mortality over length of trial (Superiority) 1:1 Randomization VS WNA: The primary endpoint is for cohort B is All Cause Mortality over the length of the trial. The trial was not powered to show superiority at 1 year, and such an analysis has not been performed. ANH: I also updated the N’s for each arm as well as the total to match the data that was sent earlier. 14

All-cause mortality (%) HR [95% CI] = 0.54 [0.38, 0.78] P (log rank) < 0.0001 100 Standard Rx TAVI 80 60 50.7% All-cause mortality (%) 40 30.7% 20 ∆ at 1 yr = 20.0% NNT = 5.0 pts Months Numbers at Risk TAVI 179 138 122 67 26 Standard Rx 121 83 41 12

Mortality or Major Stroke HR [95% CI] = 0.58 [0.43, 0.78] P (log rank) = 0.0003 100 Standard Rx TAVI 80 51.3% 60 All-cause mortality or Major Stroke (%) 40 33.0% 20 ∆ at 1 yr = 18.3% NNT = 5.5 pts Months Numbers at Risk TAVI 179 132 118 56 25 Standard Rx 83 41 12

Mortality or Repeat Hosp HR [95% CI] = 0.46 [0.35, 0.59] P (log rank) < 0.0001 100 Standard Rx TAVI 80 71.6% 60 All-cause mortality or Repeat Hospitalization (%) 40 42.5% ∆ at 1 yr = 29.1% NNT = 3.4 pts 20 Months Numbers at Risk TAVI 179 117 102 56 22 Standard Rx 121 49 23 4

NNT to be alive at 1 year with >20 pt increase in KCCQ = 3!

PARTNER Cohort A to be presented at ACC 2011 What does the future hold? PARTNER Cohort A to be presented at ACC 2011 TAVI Yogi Berra: “The future ain’t what it used to be.” Former President George W. Bush: “We will know the future when we get there.”

Conclusions Our aging demographic means that a large number of patients with AS will be elderly and have co-morbidities that make open AVR high risk A large percentage (~30%) of patients with AS are sufficiently high risk or truly inoperable and do not receive AVR at all PARTNER demonstrated that TAVI markedly improves the survival and quality of life for these patients Together, these 2 groups (inoperable and high-risk) will result in the majority of patients with AS receiving TAVI in the future