A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 1: COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING
Advertisements

PARMA UNIVERSITY SIMULATIONS OF THE ISOLATED BUILDING TEST CASE F. AURELI, A. MARANZONI & P. MIGNOSA DICATeA, Parma University Parco Area delle Scienze.
Joint Mathematics Meetings Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Christopher McCabe, Derek Causon and Clive Mingham Centre for Mathematical Modelling & Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University MANCHESTER M1 5GD.
Finite Volume II Philip Mocz. Goals Construct a robust, 2nd order FV method for the Euler equation (Navier-Stokes without the viscous term, compressible)
EULER Code for Helicopter Rotors EROS - European Rotorcraft Software Romuald Morvant March 2001.
Numerical Simulation of Wave-Seawall Interaction Clive Mingham, Derek Causon, David Ingram and Stephen Richardson Centre for Mathematical Modelling and.
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
July 11, 2006 Comparison of Exact and Approximate Adjoint for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization ICCFD 4 July 10-14, 2006, Ghent Giampietro Carpentieri and.
UNICAMP THE HEIGHT OF LIQUID METHOD FOR FREE SURFACE FLOWS Flow simulations of real processes often involve fluids that are separated by a sharp interface.
Introduction to numerical simulation of fluid flows
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.
Accurate Numerical Treatment of the Source Terms in the Non-linear Shallow Water Equations J.G. Zhou, C.G. Mingham, D.M. Causon and D.M. Ingram Centre.
Multi-Scale Finite-Volume (MSFV) method for elliptic problems Subsurface flow simulation Mark van Kraaij, CASA Seminar Wednesday 13 April 2005.
Use of satellite altimeter data for validating large scale hydraulic models Matt Wilson, University of Exeter Doug Alsdorf, Ohio State University Paul.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
Numerical study of wave and submerged breakwater interaction (Data-driven and Physical-based Model for characterization of Hydrology, Hydraulics, Oceanography.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.
A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
A Novel Wave-Propagation Approach For Fully Conservative Eulerian Multi-Material Simulation K. Nordin-Bates Lab. for Scientific Computing, Cavendish Lab.,
CFD Lab - Department of Engineering - University of Liverpool Ken Badcock & Mark Woodgate Department of Engineering University of Liverpool Liverpool L69.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Approximate Riemann Solvers for Multi-component flows Ben Thornber Academic Supervisor: D.Drikakis Industrial Mentor: D. Youngs (AWE) Aerospace Sciences.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
The Governing Equations The hydrodynamic model adopted here is the one based on the hydrostatic pressure approximation and the boussinesq approximation,
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Different numerical approaches to 3D transport modelling of fusion devices Alexander Kalentyev.
Modeling of the Unsteady Separated Flow over Bilge Keels of FPSO Hulls under Heave or Roll Motions Yi-Hsiang Yu 09/23/04 Copies of movies/papers and today’s.
Flowing Matter – COST Action MP1305, , Sofia NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE STENOSIS EFFECTS ON THE BLOOD FLOW IN THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION.
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
A Non-iterative Hyperbolic, First-order Conservation Law Approach to Divergence-free Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations Richard J. Thompson 1 and Trevor.
1 IV European Conference of Computational Mechanics Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja, Vedrana Kozulić Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja,
Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.
1 Application of Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Limiting to Compact Interpolation Schemes Debojyoti Ghosh Graduate Research Assistant Alfred Gessow.
SPH weekly meeting Free surface flows in Code Saturne Results 23/11/2009 Olivier Cozzi.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
CSE 872 Dr. Charles B. Owen Advanced Computer Graphics1 Water Computational Fluid Dynamics Volumes Lagrangian vs. Eulerian modelling Navier-Stokes equations.
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Modelling of Marine Systems. Shallow waters Equations.
Computer Animation Rick Parent Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Example application – Finite Volume Discretization Numerical Methods for PDEs Spring 2007 Jim E. Jones.
Algorithm of the explicit type for porous medium flow simulation
Part IV: Detailed Flow Structure Chap. 7: Microscopic Balances
Transient Mixed Flow Modeling Capability in SRH-2D for Culverts and Bridges Yong G. Lai.
Computations of Force and Motion Response to Arbitrary Fluid Motions around Stationary Vessels J.A. Pinkster.
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
© Fluent Inc. 1/10/2018L1 Fluids Review TRN Solution Methods.
Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Objective Review Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS)
Continuity Equation.
Efficient Parallel Simulation of Fluid Dynamics on Cartesian Grids
topic8_NS_vectorForm_F02
Finite Volume Method Philip Mocz.
topic8_NS_vectorForm_F02
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
Particle-in-Cell Methods
Topic 8 Pressure Correction
Ph.D. Thesis Numerical Solution of PDEs and Their Object-oriented Parallel Implementations Xing Cai October 26, 1998.
Presentation transcript:

A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, U.K. M Folley and TJT Whittaker School of Civil Engineering, Queen’s University, Belfast

Acknowledgement EPSRC (UK) for funding the project (grant number GR/S12333)

Background LIMPET: a wave energy converter based on the Oscillating Water Column (OWC) principle. LIMPET installation on Islay, Scotland (75kw). Small scale experimental trials at Queen’s University, Belfast.

Background The problem involves both water and air flows, wave breaking, non-sinusoidal waves, vortex formation and air entrainment. Linear wave theory is not suitable for modelling such flow problems. A two-fluid (water/air) non-linear model (Qian,Causon,Ingram and Mingham, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.129, no.9, 2003) has been applied in the present study.

AMAZON-SC: Numerical Wave Flume Two fluid (air/water), boundary conforming, time accurate, conservation law based, flow code utilising the surface capturing approach. Cartesian cut cell techniques are used to represent solid static or moving boundaries.

Governing equations 2D incompressible, Euler equations with variable density. b is the coefficient of artificial compressibility

Discretisation The equations are discretised using a finite volume formulation Where Qi is the average value of Q in cell i (stored at the cell centre), Vi is the volume of the cell, Fij is the numerical flux across the interface between cells i and j and and Dlj is the length of side j.

Convective fluxes The convective flux (Fij) is evaluated using Roe’s approximate Riemann solver. To ensure second order accuracy, MUSCL reconstruction is used where (x,y) is a point inside the cell ij, r is the coordinate vector of (x,y) relative to ij and DQij is the slope limited gradient.

Time discretisation The implicit backward Euler scheme is used together with an artificial time variable t (to ensure a divergence free velocity field) and a linearised RHS. The resulting system is solved using an approximate LU factorisation.

Computer Implementation A Jameson-type dual time iteration is used to eliminate  at each real (outer) iteration. The code vectorises efficiently with simulations typically taking about three hours to run on an NEC SX6i deskside supercomputer.

Boundary Conditions Seaward boundary – a solid moving paddle (boundary) is used to generate waves (wave-maker). Atmospheric boundary – a constant atmospheric pressure gradient is applied. Spray and water passing out of this boundary are lost from the computation. Landward boundary – a solid wall boundary condition is used for the landward end of the domain. Bed and wave power device – modelled using Cartesian cut cell techniques.

Cartesian Cut Cell Method Automatic mesh generation Boundary fitted Extends to moving boundaries

Input vertices of solid boundary (and domain) Cartesian Cut Cells Input vertices of solid boundary (and domain)

Cartesian Cut Cells Input vertices of solid boundary (and domain) Overlay Cartesian grid

Cartesian Cut Cells Input vertices of solid boundary (and domain) Overlay Cartesian grid Identify Cut Cells and compute intersection points.

Wave Generation Waves are generated using a moving paddle with prescribed velocity: U=-0.2sin(2t) 0.3m Still Water Level; 6.0m long wave tank Using 120x40 grid cells 10 waves simulated, starting from still water

Wave Generation Comparison with experimental results for free surface elevation at two locations

LIMPET OWC Simulation Wave Conditions: Regular waves with wave length L  1.5m , period T=1.0s and still water level H = 0.15m. Device located at about 2 wave lengths from the moving paddle 5 seconds simulated, starting from still water

Small Scale Test at QUB

LIMPET OWC Simulation Free surface position and velocity vectors at T=4.0s

LIMPET OWC Simulation Free surface position and velocity vectors at T=4.2s

LIMPET OWC Simulation Free surface position and velocity vectors at T=4.4s

LIMPET OWC Simulation Free surface position and velocity vectors at T=4.6s

LIMPET OWC Simulation Free surface position and velocity vectors at T = 4.8s

LIMPET OWC Simulation Free surface position and velocity vectors at T = 5.0s.

Conclusions Some initial results have been presented for simulation of LIMPET OWC device using a surface capturing method in a Cartesian cut cell framework. The method is computationally efficient, Capable of modelling both water and air, as well as their interface Can handle both static and moving boundary easily. Detailed comparisons with the small scale test from QUB using the same wave conditions are in progress. The numerical model is generic and can be used to model a wide range of wave energy devices.