Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

Emerging Technologies Working Group Discussion: AXRs September 24, Contents I.Ready or Not, Here They Come II.ALRs, the Camel’s Nose III.The Whys.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup Update to DSWG 3/9/
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
“Rethinking” Ancillary Services in ERCOT and Efforts to Incorporate “Loads In SCED” ERCOT Staff Operator Training Seminar Spring 2014.
April 23, 2014 DSWG Loads in SCEDv1 Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher ERCOT Staff.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
LMP-G Policy Issues Discussion Demand Side Working Group July 9 th,
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
RCWG Update to WMS December 5, General Update Agenda Items for Today: Verifiable Cost Manual clarifications (vote) White Paper on Long Term Fuel.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Photovoltaic and Storage Integration Workshop “Operational Issues” Kenneth Ragsdale October 15, 2012 ERCOT.
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: LMP Minus G.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
This slide deck contains animations. Please open this deck in slide show mode (“View” menu, then click on “Slide Show”). To move through the animations,
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
August 8, 2013 Loads in SCED Workshop II Load Participation in SCED NPRR 555 ERCOT Staff Presentation.
MIRTM Temporal Constraints Discussion Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Jan. 8, 2016.
Harika Basaran 11/05/2014 TAC October 23, 2014 Meeting Update to Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) Update April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting 1.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
Third Party DR Self-Deployment Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Sept. 18, 2015.
DSWG Update to WMS 8/10/2011. DSWG Goals #DSWG GoalDeliverable Target Date Primary Owner Team MembersStatus 1SCED Load Participation Complete analysis.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
Thoughts on DER Aggregations ERCOT Staff DREAM TF Sept. 28, DER Aggregations.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Load Resource Participation in EILS EILS Subgroup October 27, 2011.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
NSRS in Nodal Proposal for Deployment & Recall Procedures ERCOT ROS 10/12-13/2006 By: S.Niemeyer R.Jones R.Wheeler B.Green J.Dumas P.Breitzman.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Market Trials Open Market Participant Call
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
Principles of Participation in Real-Time Co-optimization
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Market Notice Regarding Off-line Units
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: Loads in SCED version 2
Interpreting DREAM NPRR 777.
Project Update and Summary of Project Priority List (PPL) Activity to Date July 17, 2014.
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Presentation transcript:

Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development NPRR 555 (Loads in SCED 1.0) Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development WMS: NPRR 555 July 10, 2013

NPRR 555: Loads in SCED 1.0 NPRR 555 represents ERCOT’s effort to find a way for DR to contribute to price formation, with potential for implementation by Summer 2014 July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

Timeline To meet summer 2014 goal, ERCOT will need to meet following market rules timeline: May 28 Concept doc distributed to TAC/WMS/DSWG May 31 DSWG discussion June 6 TAC introduction to concept June 10 Loads in SCED Workshop June 12 WMS discussion June 27 NPRR draft posted June 28 DSWG review of draft NPRR July 3 NPRR 555 filed (ERCOT sponsored) with preliminary IA July 8 DSWG Subgroup – deep dive review July 10 WMS NPRR discussion (possible vote) July 18 PRS NPRR discussion (possible vote) Aug. 14 WMS redux (possible vote) Aug. 22 PRS NPRR discussion (vote) Sept. 5 TAC NPRR discussion (vote) Sept. 17 BOD NPRR discussion (vote) July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

Existing or new single-site Controllable Load Resources (CLRs) High-level summary Eligibility to participate: LSE QSEs representing Load Resources capable of following 5-minute SCED base point instructions Existing or new single-site Controllable Load Resources (CLRs) SCED qualification will be a new attribute for redefined CLR Aggregate Load Resources (ALRs) composed of multiple sites within single ERCOT Load Zone (subset of CLR) New interface will allow QSEs to maintain ALR populations Will not support direct participation by third-party DR QSEs Will not support DR with temporal constraints or block energy bids If LR’s bid is on the margin, base point instructions could require LR to move up or down incrementally every 5 minutes to any level between its LPC and MPC SCED will honor LR’s telemetered ramp rates July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

High-level summary (cont.) QSEs with LRs in SCED will submit Bids to buy (not Offers to sell) Bids will reflect LR’s willingness to consume “up to” a specified five-minute Load Zone LMP May be a curve or a MW bid at single strike price Bid curve option could allow the QSE to submit bids with different strike prices for separate loads within the LR Bid will modify the SCED demand curve and have ability to set price SCED Generation to be Dispatched (GTBD) will be adjusted to accommodate LR participation This will ensure proper price formation and reduce the likelihood of oscillating dispatch instructions This creates settlement outcomes equivalent to the “volumetric flow” LMP minus G methodology endorsed by TAC, while avoiding need for ERCOT to “send back” the DR value to the LSE July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

High-level summary (cont.) LR benefits and opportunity: Avoided cost of consumption above specified price Price certainty due to ERCOT dispatch Eligibility to provide Non-spin Market impacts: LR Bids may set price in the RTM No make-whole payments No load ratio share uplifts to market for DR value SCED will dispatch LRs for power balance and congestion management using the applicable Load Zone Shift Factor July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

High-level summary (cont.) Eligible LRs may also participate in Non-spin Reserves For Offline Non-Spin, energy Bids ≥$180 will need to be released to SCED within 20 minutes following dispatch, similar to Generation Resources providing Offline Non-spin For Online Non-Spin, energy Bids ≥$120 will need to be active in SCED for all intervals that the LR is obligated in Non-Spin Bids from LRs providing Non-Spin capped at the System Wide Offer Cap NPRR 555 also proposes that any CLR providing RRS also must be dispatched by SCED July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

High-level summary (cont.) Implementation of Loads in SCED 1.0 is related to adoption of NPRR 532 CPS Energy: LR Participation in Non-spin For ALRs, participation in SCED and Non-spin are both contingent on validation by ERCOT of the QSE’s telemetry at time of LR qualification, and spot-validation thereafter OBD associated with NPRR 532 describes this process Telemetry from LRs providing Non-Spin must include Scheduled Power Consumption and SPC+2 to allow baseline-style M&V M&V for LR in SCED for energy only does not require use of SPC and SPC+2 All members of ALR must have revenue-grade premise level 15-minute interval metering Via ESI ID or NOIE meter data submission process similar to ERS July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

Changes to Load Resource definitions Loads in SCED NPRR redefines Controllable Load Resource (CLR) CLRs will provide Regulation, RRS (as non-UFR type resource) & Non-Spin RRS and Non-Spin from CLR will be deployed via economic dispatch of DR capacity via SCED CLR will have RTM Energy Bid that covers the RRS and/or Non-Spin capacity released to SCED Also can optionally bid additional DR capacity for SCED dispatch SCED will only consider CLR for dispatch if its telemetered Resource status indicates it is On-Line Must be On-Line if carrying AS responsiblity July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

Non-Controllable Load Resource (NCLR) CLR (cont.) CLR qualifications: To qualify for providing Regulation and RRS, tested for ability to provide Primary Frequency Response (no change from today) To provide RRS, Non-Spin or Real-Time energy only, tested for ability to follow SCED Base Point Instructions To provide Non-Spin or Real-Time energy only, not required to provide Primary Frequency Response  Non-Controllable Load Resource (NCLR) NCLR participation going forward limited to UFR-type Load Resources providing RRS July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

No change to existing participation in RRS by UFR-type Load Resources Miscellaneous No change to existing participation in RRS by UFR-type Load Resources UFR-LR-RRS may still be deployed manually in EEA 2 Prices will be at SWCAP any time this happens because Gen-RRS is deployed first No change to existing ERS Participation Scenarios for LRs were presented as part of DSWG slides on June 28: http://www.ercot.com/calendar/2013/06/20130628-DSWG July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

Outstanding Issues (will/may require Comments) Configurable parameters for Base Point Deviations ERCOT looks to MPs to identify meaningful performance metrics that don’t discourage SCED participation Should they be the same for LRs with AS responsibility and those with ‘pure SCED’ (energy only) Bids? Base Point Deviation treatment of settlement intervals for LRs with telemetry status of OUTL for a portion of the interval Posting requirements and protected information status for RTM Energy Bids Physical Responsive Capability: should it include all RTM energy bids, or just those with AS responsibility? Other miscellaneous tweaks and cleanup July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555

Questions? ON OFF July 10, 2013 WMS: NPRR 555