Presented by Rob Hemmings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6th European Patients’ Rights Day The EMA Geriatric Medicines Strategy and the empowered aging patient Francesca Cerreta EMA (European Medicines Agency)
Advertisements

Panel Discussion 1 George Williams Amgen. Barbara Tilley - Sample Size Estimation… Key point – considering both short term benefit of symptomatic treatment.
Data Monitoring Models and Adaptive Designs: Some Regulatory Experiences Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Associate Director for Adaptive Design and Pharmacogenomics,
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
Clinical Pharmacy Basma Y. Kentab MSc..
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Committee Questions Design, Statistical Considerations and Study Conduct 1. There are no clear guidelines regarding the number of people that should be.
Delivering Robust Outcomes from Multinational Clinical Trials: Principles and Strategies Andreas Sashegyi, PhD Eli Lilly and Company.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
The Practical Art of Endpoint Selection: Industry Perspectives A View from the Pharma Industry of the FDA Guidance on PROs Glenn A. Phillips, Ph.D. Director.
1 Statistical Review Dr. Shan Sun-Mitchell. 2 ENT Primary endpoint: Time to treatment failure by day 50 Placebo BDP Patients randomized Number.
Impact of E9 Addendum to Industry
1 Updates on Regulatory Requirements for Missing Data Ferran Torres, MD, PhD Hospital Clinic Barcelona Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
1 f02laitenberger7 An Internally Replicated Quasi- Experimental Comparison of Checklist and Perspective-Based Reading of Code Documents Laitenberger, etal.
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
Matching Analyses to Decisions: Can we Ever Make Economic Evaluations Generalisable Across Jurisdictions? Mark Sculpher Mike Drummond Centre for Health.
CRITICAL APPARAISAL OF A PAPER ON THERAPY 421 CORSE EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE (EBM)
The research leading to these results has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no ,
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 | 1 Writing a Statistical Analysis Plan DIA Medical Writing SIAC July 12, 2012 Peter Riebling, MS, RAC Associate Director, Regulatory.
Estimands: PSI/EFSPI Special Interest group Alan Phillips 1.
for Overall Prognosis Workshop Cochrane Colloquium, Seoul
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR)
Evidence-based Medicine
Patient Involvement in the HTA Decision Making Process
Risk Communication in Medicines
Right-sized Evaluation
Clinical Studies Continuum
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Clinical Study Results Publication
Strategies to incorporate pharmacoeconomics into pharmacotherapy
NHS Community Pharmacy Contractual Framework
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Aligning Estimands and Estimators – A Case Study Sept 13, 2018 Elena Polverejan Vladimir Dragalin Quantitative Sciences Janssen R&D, Johnson & Johnson.
11/20/2018 Study Types.
Progress Report on the Patient Reported Outcomes Harmonization Team
Common Problems in Writing Statistical Plan of Clinical Trial Protocol
Greetings from 1st EFSPI regulatory workshop
Issues in Hypothesis Testing in the Context of Extrapolation
Participants’ Rights Participants of clinical trials have rights, and they are protected under law when participating in clinical trials. The informed.
SAFE 101 Chapter 5.
Tim Auton, Astellas September 2014
Approaches to Implementing in Your Organization
Dr Peter Groves MD FRCP Consultant Cardiologist
Evaluation of immunogenicity Case presentations CEMDC-PharmaTrain, Module 8. Budapest, Hungary, 12-May-2017 Vid Stanulovic MD, PhD Clinical pharmacologist,
Clinical Research Association TURKEY
Research Design Quantitative.
Patient Involvement in the Development and Use of Safe Medicines Introductory Section – Concepts to Consider CIOMS XI WG Second Meeting October 23-24,
Joint BES/BBS Seminar Patient Preference Studies – Introduction
Steven Snapinn JSM July 30, 2018
What Do We Know About Estimators for the Treatment Policy Estimand
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic. Ask What is a review?
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain
Monitoring and Evaluating FGM/C abandonment programs
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Evidence-Based Public Health
Björn Bornkamp, Georgina Bermann
Medical Statistics Exam Technique and Coaching, Part 2 Richard Kay Statistical Consultant RK Statistics Ltd 22/09/2019.
Psychological Experimentation
Gregory Levin, FDA/CDER/OTS/OB/DBIII
Implementation of Estimand framework in Oncology Clinical Trials
Regulatory-Industry Statistics Workshop
How Should We Select and Define Trial Estimands
Oncology Biostatistics
Jared Christensen and Steve Gilbert Pfizer, Inc July 29th, 2019
2019 Joint Statistical Meetings at Denver
Students Opportunities: Conferences:
Presentation transcript:

Presented by Rob Hemmings Estimands at ICH Presented by Rob Hemmings

Problem statement Lack of clarity in trial objectives: Potential to confuse developers and decision makers. Misleading information to patients and prescribers So many conversations about HOW to estimate treatments effects, and so few about WHAT to estimate. The HOW has determined the WHAT. WHAT do we want to estimate?

Context Patients differ in response to treatment. Some patients will tolerate a medicine and adhere to its administration schedule, others will not; Some patients will require additional medication, others will not. Some patients die. More than one treatment effect can be described and estimated. Are these ‘intercurrent events’ problems for estimation of a ‘true’ effect or are they to be embraced?

Current practice under ICH E9 E9 introduces the ITT principle as the best way to assess a ‘treatment-policy’. ‘Treatment discontinuation’ has been conflated with ‘Trial discontinuation’. Data after treatment discontinuation or perhaps use of rescue medication is not collected / not used. Multiple problems have been labelled as ‘missing data’. Today’s practice doesn’t adhere to the ITT principle. It hasn’t been clear WHAT treatment effect is then being estimated, and arguably estimators (HOW) do not fully respect randomisation. Can we answer questions other than treatment-policy whist maintaining the benefits of randomisation?

ICH E9 (R1) Estimands; we have these NOW, in every trial, we just don’t talk about them. ICH E9 addendum is currently being developed to provide a structured framework for talking about WHAT to estimate = the estimand. Statistical approaches then need be aligned with the treatment effect of interest. How to write a document that fits all therapeutic and experimental conditions?

ICH E9 (R1) … work continues …

Framework I Choice of estimand may impact study design and conduct and needs to be discussed first. Target of estimation = WHAT Trial Objective Estimand Main Estimator Main Estimate Sensitivity Estimator 1 Sensitivity Estimate 1 Sensitivity Estimator k Sensitivity Estimate k … Method of estimation = HOW Sensitivity analysis Supplementary analysis

Estimand attributes

Strategies At least 5 strategies for addressing intercurrent events e.g. the intervention effect “regardless of switching to rescue medication”. Determine which intercurrent events need to be considered explicitly in the construction of the estimand in order to give a clear understanding of the treatment effect to be estimated. Multiple intercurrent events per trial means multiple strategies per estimand E.g. Difference between mean change from baseline to week 24 in HbA1c in the target population, regardless of adherence, if rescue medication is not available

Construction of an estimand Should be: consequent to the trial objectives and should precede choices relating to data collection and analytic approaches. clinically interpretable, in terms of the population and endpoint, but also in terms of the intervention effect of interest and, finally, the summary measure. duly justified considering the therapeutic setting and the treatment goals of the intervention, from which the key scientific questions of interest can be derived. a multi-disciplinary undertaking and should be the subject of discussion between sponsors and regulators.

Impact: regulatory experience Current experience from Scientific Advice Working Party Company questions Plenary discussions Future expectations for Scientific Advice requests Identify intercurrent events, discuss strategies and resulting estimands Move away from discussing endpoints? Discuss design and statistical analysis in relation to an agreed estimand

Impact: regulatory experience Current experience from CHMP List of Questions; ask about the handling of ‘missing data’ or treatment effect of interest? Plenary discussions Potential consequences for future MAAs One ‘estimand’ or many? Product Information and HTA engagement Note on external comparisons; ‘context’; meta-analyses etc. Current expectations for future therapy-area guidelines

Thanks for your attention