Transmitted by the expert from Germany

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
Advertisements

ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
THE EUROPEAN TYRE AND RIM TECHNICAL ORGANISATION AT tyres: What are they? tyres inflated at very low inflation pressures (
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
19-21 September 2011 JASIC Kei-truck of N1 Informal document GRB (54th GRB, September 2011, agenda item 3(b))
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Categorization of Light N1 Vehicles 58 th GRB (2 – 4 September 2013) JASIC This is a reference material for “GRB (Japan) Proposal for the 03 series.
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
Proposal Netherlands Tyre Noise Limits Original GRB Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
Informal document GRB Rev.1
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
Transmitted by the expert from Japan
64th GRB EU Regulation on AVAS requirements
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Noise problems and driving conditions in China based on ECE R51.03
Micro-Van and Micro-Truck
Reversing Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Informal document GRRF-86-36
GRBP subjects Meeting 31st October, 2018 Brussels
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N- Vehicles
“Reference Sound Assessment”
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Informal document GRB-54-11
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Presentation transcript:

Transmitted by the expert from Germany Informal document GRB-66-17 (66th GRB, 4-6 September 2017, agenda item 10) Possibility of “Pass-by-Light” Noise-measurement of vehicles of Category L „Pass-by-Light“-Test : PbL-Test www.bmvi.de

Background: Stationary Noise Stationary Noise Measurement & Values were established > 50 years ! Intention was: If Noise in Motion is too loud, Stationary Noise is also higher ! If Stationary Noise is measured as too loud, you know that Noise in Motion is also higher than Type Approval Value and/or Limit Value! Worked well for PTI- and Road-side-checks of L-Cat.-vehicles for e.g.: Wrong silencers Racing Silencer Mechanical Manipulations www.bmvi.de | 04. Sep. 2017

Stationary Noise Measuring does not entirely reflect measure the driving noise of manipulated motorcycles, due to vehicle technology changes ! Extremely modified gear ratio Mechanical variable flap systems Intelligent steered flap systems Soundgenerator (may be in future?) Remote control of flap systems

UN-R 41.04 Annex 3 Paragraph 3 3.1 A test procedure for in-use compliance tests may be defined by a Contracting Party, taking due account of any differences from the test conditions used at type-approval. 3.2 Therefore UN-R41.04 approved motorbikes has to show on a sticker: (a) Gear (i) (or gear selector position of vehicles tested “non-locked”), (b) Pre-acceleration length lPA [m], (c) Average vehicle speed at VAA’ [km/h] for tests in gear (i); and (d) Sound pressure level Lwot,(i) [dB(A)] in gear (i). The Study German has done should find out: if it is possible to measure UN-R41.04 approved bikes with “road-side-check equipment”, taking into account all differences to Annex 3 measurements. www.bmvi.de | 04. Sep. 2017

Therefore 12 motorbikes were tested: Original (not modified; Series/Standard) With NORESS With manipulated OEM- or NORESS NORESS A SLIP-On 1-1; Flap System fixed wide open ! N o. Manu- facturer Type Commercial Name Additional measured loud conditions 1 Kawasaki EN650A Vulcan S --- 2 LE650E Versys 650 ABS 3 ER300A Z300 NORESS Variant B 4 Triumph V201 Explorer NORESS Variant A 5 DE01 Thruxton 6 BMW R12WR R 1200 RS NORESS Variant A and C 7 Yamaha RN45 MT-10 OEM silencer (fixed flap) 8 RM14 MT07 Tracer 9 Ducati AA Multistrada 1200 S 10 MA Monster 1200 R 11 BA Hypermotard 939 12 GA Xdiavel NORESS B SLIP-On; 1-2; 2 dB-Eaters; One Removed! NORESS C SLIP-On; 1-1; Approved to BMW R 1200 RS! Manipulation of OEM-Flap System:

Tests carried out under: Annex 3 conditions (ISO-Test-track, Annex 3 equipment) Tests carried out under: - “country road” with a full two lane cross-section - "a paved farm road" www.bmvi.de | 09. März 2015

Equipment & Tolerances High Level GPS Speed-Measurement (Price about 7000,-€) Low Level GPS Speed-Measurement (Price about 100,-€) Precision Sound Level Meter/Calibration (UN-R 41.04 Annex 3 Par. 1.1.1) Weather Conditions (Temp., Air Huimidity, Wind-Speed) measured by mobile instruments Average of 5 Measurements per side; Lwot - 1 dB(A), Diff. Lwot < 2 dB(A); VAA’: + 1 km/h to Sticker Value

Measured Values www.bmvi.de | 04. Sep. 2017

Analysis and Results of PbL-Test measurements Speed-Tolerance VAA’ of + 1 km/h is feasible for the driver and equipment Speed-Tolerance VPP’ of + 2 km/h produces same level SPL-Values Mass-Tolerances of Vehicle & Driver up to 6% of MRO has no influence Measured SPL Country-Road doesn’t differ more than +1,4 / -0,7 dB(A) to ISO (higher values caused by minimally reflecting hill) Measured SPL Paved-Farm-Road doesn’t differ more than -0,1 / -1,3 dB(A) to ISO (lower values caused by sound absorbing influence of trees soft soil beside driving lane) “High- & Low-Level GPS-Speed-Measurement-Equipment” is OK for PbL-Tests

Conclusion Sound Level Increment Significantly noisier L-Cat-Vehicles can easily be identified by PbL-Test If driving lane shows similarity to ISO-track (e.g. surface layer, evenness, longitudinal gradient …) but deviation from cross-section (width, evenness, roadside vegetation) the PbL-Test can be used for motorbikes. Sound Level Increment For the PbL-Test Final Result + 5 dB(A) should be added to the Sticker-SPL-Level to come to the classification OK or Not-OK. www.bmvi.de | 04. Sep. 2017

Total + 5 dB(A) The Increment of + 5 dB(A) consists by the Surcharges Influences caused by alternative test section + 1dB(A) Influences caused by different Vehicle test speed + 1dB(A) Influences caused by different Vehicle MRO incl. Driver + 1dB(A) Serial production spread of the vehicle + 1dB(A) Influences caused by aging of vehicle & its components + 1dB(A) Total + 5 dB(A)

Example: Sticker value Lwot (i) 82 dB(A) means that 87 dB(A) as a final result during PbL-Test would be the highest value which will be accepted as OK ! [82 dBA) + 5 dB(A) PbL-Increment] 87 dB(A) in general also means the highest accepted final result during PbL-Test of vehicles which have an 77 dB(A) Annex 3 Lurban Limit Value ! [77 dB(A) + 5 dB(A) because of 6.2.3 + 5 dB(A) PbL-Increment] Germany wants to establish a national PbL-Test-directive for UN-R 41.04 appro-ved motorbikes and its NORESS for Road-Side-Checks and PTI in the future. www.bmvi.de | 04. Sep. 2017

Thanks for your attention!