Jennifer A. Cowger, MD, Matthew A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hemolysis in Patients Supported with Durable, Long-Term Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy Jason N. Katz, MD,MHS; Brian C. Jensen, MD; Patricia P.
Advertisements

Comparative cost-effectiveness of the HeartWare versus HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices used in the United Kingdom National Health Service.
Systolic blood pressure on discharge after left ventricular assist device insertion is associated with subsequent stroke Michael E. Nassif, MD, Anjan Tibrewala,
Sixth INTERMACS annual report: A 10,000-patient database James K. Kirklin, MD, David C. Naftel, PhD, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD, Robert L. Kormos, MD,
Janet T. Lee, MD, Rosemary F. Kelly, MD, Marshall I
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, Dale Kobrin, BA, J. Eduardo Rame, MD, Peter W
Evan P. Kransdorf, MD, PhD, Michelle M. Kittleson, MD, PhD, Jignesh K
Identifying patients for advanced heart failure therapy by screening patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator:
Impact of aortic valve closure on adverse events and outcomes with the HeartWare ventricular assist device  David Dobarro, MD, Marian Urban, MD, Karen.
James K. Kirklin, MD, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD, Robert L
Can the Seattle Heart Failure Model Be Used to Risk-stratify Heart Failure Patients for Potential Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy?  Wayne C. Levy,
The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty- seventh official adult heart transplant report—2010  Josef Stehlik,
Symptom-to-Balloon Time is a Strong Predictor of Adverse Events Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the Australian Capital.
Limitations of right heart catheterization in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with pulmonary hypertension related to left heart disease:
Pre-operative mortality risk assessment in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: Application of the HeartMate II risk score 
Adverse Events in Children Implanted With Ventricular Assist Devices in the US: Data From the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory.
Outcomes in highly sensitized pediatric heart transplant patients using current management strategies  Alfred Asante-Korang, MD, Ernest K. Amankwah, PhD,
Severe Mitral Regurgitation at Time of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation - Comparison of Systematic Mitral Valve Repair vs Surgical Abstention 
Fifth INTERMACS annual report: Risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients  James K. Kirklin, MD, David C. Naftel,
Palliative Medicine and Preparedness Planning for Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy—Challenges to Measuring Impact.
Surgically Corrected Mitral Regurgitation During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Associated With Low Recurrence Rate and Improved Midterm.
Survival on the Heart Transplant Waiting List: Impact of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge to Transplant  Jaimin R. Trivedi, MD,
One-year outcomes with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device
Assessment of an extracorporeal life support to LVAD bridge to heart transplant strategy  Francis D Pagani, MD, PhD, Keith D Aaronson, MD, David B Dyke,
Laura Harvey, MD, Christopher Holley, MD, Samit S
Risk of stroke early after implantation of a left ventricular assist device  Takaaki Samura, MD, Daisuke Yoshioka, MD, PhD, Koichi Toda, MD, PhD, Ryoto.
Patient and Graft Survival Following Kidney Transplantation in Recipients With Cystinosis: A Cohort Study  Rebecca A. Spicer, MBChB, Philip A. Clayton,
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): On track to compete with heart transplantation?  James K. Kirklin, MD, David C. Naftel,
Outcomes in lung transplantation after previous lung volume reduction surgery in a contemporary cohort  Leah Backhus, MD, Jonathon Sargent, BS, Aaron.
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, Dale Kobrin, BA, J. Eduardo Rame, MD, Peter W
Prior Sternotomy and Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Do Not Adversely Impact Survival or Allograft Function After Heart Transplantation  Ann C.
Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic- dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices? 
Postmarket Experience With HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: 30-Day Outcomes From the ELEVATE Registry  Jens Garbade, MD, PhD, Finn Gustafsson,
Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With a Small Left Ventricle  Masashi Kawabori, MD, Chitaru Kurihara, MD, Tadahisa.
Long-term support of 9 patients with the DeBakey VAD for more than 200 days  Markus J. Wilhelm, MD, Dieter Hammel, MD, Christof Schmid, MD, Andreas Rhode,
Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi- institutional comparison shows significant differences  John M.
Should Patients 60 Years and Older Undergo Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices?  Jeremiah G. Allen, MD, Arman.
Outcomes on Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Single Institutional 9- Year Experience  Jeffrey A. Morgan, MD, Pauline H. Go, MD, Linnea.
Beating heart surgery via right thoracotomy for reoperative mitral valve surgery: A safe and effective operative alternative  Matthew A. Romano, MD, Jonathan.
A first start for lung transplantation?
Right ventricular failure after cardiac surgery: Why can't right ventricular assist device support fix the problem?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal.
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011  William L.
William L. Holman, MD, James K. Kirklin, MD, David C
Posttransplant Outcomes Among Septuagenarians Bridged to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices  Shinichi Fukuhara, MD,
Mechanical Circulatory Support Pathways That Maximize Post-Heart Transplant Survival  Tara Karamlou, MD, MS, Jill Gelow, MD, Brian S. Diggs, PhD, Frederick.
William M. Whited, MD, Paul Henley, BS, Erin M
Initial Clinical Experience With the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist System: A Single- Center Report  Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila, MD, Stefan Rudolf Bertram.
Outcomes of Patients Receiving Temporary Circulatory Support Before Durable Ventricular Assist Device  Palak Shah, MD, MS, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD,
Mechanical Circulatory Support and Heart Transplantation: Donor and Recipient Factors Influencing Graft Survival  Simon Maltais, MD, PhD, Nikhil P. Jaik,
Early Outcomes With Marginal Donor Hearts Compared With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure  Erin M. Schumer,
Jay K. Bhama, MD, Utsav Bansal, BS, Daniel G. Winger, MS, Jeffrey J
Left ventricular assist device implantation after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: A two-center study  Nicholas C. Dang,
Insertion of a left ventricular assist device in patients without thorough transplant evaluations: a worthwhile risk?  Mathew Williams, MD, Jennifer Casher,
The Impact of Volume Reduction on Early and Long-Term Outcomes in Surgical Ventricular Restoration for Severe Heart Failure  Nathan Wm. Skelley, BS, Jeremiah.
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices  Forum Kamdar, MD, Ranjit John,
Improved Survival and Decreasing Incidence of Adverse Events With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge-to-Transplant Therapy  Ranjit.
Farhan Zafar, MD, John L. Jefferies, MD, MPH, Christine J
Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation after ventricular assist device implantation  James S Gammie, MD, Leah B Edwards, PhD, Bartley P Griffith, MD,
Current Status of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
Optimal timing for heart transplantation in patients bridged with left ventricular assist devices: Is timing of the essence?  Chase R. Brown, MD, Fabliha.
Late Aortic Insufficiency Related to Poor Prognosis During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support  Koichi Toda, MD, PhD, Tomoyuki Fujita, MD, Keitaro.
Gastrointestinal bleeding after left ventricular assist device implantation: It is all about the platelets  Juan A. Crestanello, MD  The Journal of Thoracic.
Nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices  Steven M Gordon, MD, Steven K Schmitt, MD, Micah Jacobs,
Survival of subjects listed for heart transplantation with different spirometric ventilatory patterns. Survival of subjects listed for heart transplantation.
Survival of subjects listed for heart transplantation with and without spirometry. Survival of subjects listed for heart transplantation with and without.
Marginal Donor Use in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation With Left Ventricular Assist Device Explantation  Marat Fudim, MD, Mary E. Davis, MS,
Significance of Postoperative Acute Renal Failure After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation  Jamil Borgi, MD, Athanasios Tsiouris,
Risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation
Presentation transcript:

Hemolysis: A harbinger of adverse outcome after left ventricular assist device implant  Jennifer A. Cowger, MD, Matthew A. Romano, MD, Palak Shah, MD, MS, Neha Shah, MBBS, CCRP, Vivek Mehta, BS, Jonathan W. Haft, MD, Keith D. Aaronson, MD, MS, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation  Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 35-43 (January 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021 Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Frequency of hemolysis episodes. The percentage of patients in the study cohort experiencing any hemolysis episode based on biochemical parameters (sfHg > 40 mg/dL or LDH ≥ 600 IU/L), INTERMACS-defined hemolysis (sfHg > 40 mg/dL with signs/symptoms), LDH-defined hemolysis (LDH ≥ 600 IU/L), or dual-hemolysis (simultaneous sfHg > 40 mg/dL and LDH ≥ 600 IU/L). The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2014 33, 35-43DOI: (10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021) Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Time to onset of index hemolysis episode based on Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS; red) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; blue) criteria after ventricular assist device implant. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2014 33, 35-43DOI: (10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021) Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Event-free survival after left ventricular assist device implant in patients with and without hemolysis. Kaplan-Meier survival free of death, device exchange for thrombosis, urgent United Network of Organ Sharing 1A transplant for device thrombosis, or peripheral embolism/stroke after device implant is shown in patients with and without Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-defined hemolysis (serum free hemoglobin > 40 mg/dL plus symptoms) and with and without lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-defined hemolysis (LDH ≥ 600 IU/L). The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2014 33, 35-43DOI: (10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021) Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Event-free survival after hemolysis onset. Kaplan-Meier survival free of death, peripheral embolism, urgent United Network of Organ Sharing 1A transplant for device thrombosis, or device exchange for thrombosis is shown in patients with and without Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-defined hemolysis (serum free hemoglobin > 40 mg/dl plus symptoms) and in patients with and without lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-defined hemolysis (LDH ≥ 600 IU/L). *Days represents days from onset of INTERMACS or LDH-defined hemolysis (LDH ≥600 IU/L) or from device implant (in non-hemolyzers) to an event. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2014 33, 35-43DOI: (10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021) Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 This graphic shows the median time-to-event onset after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant and the median time-to-event occurrence after onset of Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-defined (red) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-defined (blue) hemolysis. XC, exchange. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2014 33, 35-43DOI: (10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021) Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Terms and Conditions