MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /1120r0 Submission Buffer Status Report Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
BSS Load Information in ax Follow up
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
LB225 CR (Link Adaptation)
TWT Information frames in 11ax
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Multiple BSSID and MU Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Regarding UL MU protection
6 GHz operation for 11ax Date: Name Affiliation Address
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
Regarding HE fragmentation
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
6 GHz operation for 11ax follow up
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Explanations for CR on NDP feedback report
Comment resolution on CID 20175
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
6 GHz operation for 11ax Date: Name Affiliation Address
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Regarding HE fragmentation
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
OBSS_PD simplification
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Presentation transcript:

MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax November 2016 MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax Date: 2016-11-05 Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

November 2016 Introduction In this presentation we propose clarifying the selection rules for PPDU type, BW, and <MCS, NSS> for 11ax The topic is related, but not limited, to CR of CID 203 And more in general we propose to finalize all the normative behavior for the selection of these parameters for control response frames The proposal being to inherit rules from 11ac unless explicitly stated otherwise CID Commenter P.L Comment Proposed Change Resolution 203 Alfred Asterjadhi 63.24 MCS selection rules for sending M-BA by a STA is not defined As in comment. Revised. Agree in principle. Proposed changes in this document account for comment resolution Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

PPDU selection for control frames November 2016 PPDU selection for control frames (A-)MPDU Ack/BA SIFS CTS RTS HE PPDU TXOP Non-HT Rules are conceptually inline with baseline, while accounting for 11ax concepts: AP may chose any format for sending control frames as a response to trigger-based PPDUs An HE STA shall send control frames in a non-HT PPDU except when: The frame is a response to an ER SU, SU, or UL MU PPDU that uses STBC in which case: The control frame shall use the same PPDU format as the soliciting PPDU (as baseline) The frame is an Ack, BA, or M-BA sent as a response to a Trigger-based PPDU in which case: The control frame may be carried in any PPDU format that is supported by the intended receiver(s) (11ax motion) The Control frame is sent as a response to a PPDU containing a Trigger (non-MU RTS) or an UL MU Response Scheduling A-Control field in which case it shall be carried in HE Trigger-based PPDU format The Control frame is an Ack sent in response to ER SU, SU, or UL MU PPDU containing FTM In which case the Ack frame shall be sent in the same PPDU format as the soliciting PPDU Other exceptions for situations with reverse link imbalance are discussed in the next slides Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

ER SU and reverse link imbalances (1) November 2016 ER SU and reverse link imbalances (1) Good: Closes the link Bad: legacy EIFS issues EIFS Closes the link No EIFS issues ER SU SU Non-HT AP Probe Response Ack Data Ack … Probe Request ER SU Ack Data Ack Data Non-AP AP signals switch to non-HT ER SU ER SU ER SU ER SU ER SU ER SU PPDUs cover extended range and link imbalance use cases Both transmission and reception of ER SU PPDUs is optional There is a capability bit but normative behavior is yet to be specified in TGax D0.5 Format of control response frames sent in response to ER SU PPDUs is undefined We propose that RX STA choses (and indicate to TX STA) which PPDU format to use Benefits from ER SU PPDU selection when TX power is insufficient to close the reverse link, Non-HT PPDU selection (when TX power is sufficient to close the reverse link. Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

ER SU and reverse link imbalances (2) November 2016 ER SU and reverse link imbalances (2) Good: Closes the link Bad: legacy EIFS issues UL limited case EIFS Closes the link No EIFS issues ER SU SU Non-HT AP Probe Response Ack Data Ack … Probe Request ER SU Ack Data Ack Data Non-AP AP signals Control Resp. PPDU format to non-HT ER SU ER SU ER SU ER SU ER SU Closes the link No EIFS issues DL limited case STA signals Control Resp. PPDU format to non-HT ER SU AP Data Ack Non-AP Non-HT Proposed rules for ER SU PPDU generation and reception: An HE STA may transmit an ER SU PPDU to a peer STA that supports its reception as indicated by the ER SU PPDU Payload field of the HE Capabilities element received from the peer STA. An HE STA shall not send an ER SU PPDU to a STA that does not support their reception. The responding STA shall send the control response using the eliciting PPDU format except when the responding HE STA has explicitly indicated an alternative PPDU format that it will be using to send the response (see next slide) Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

Explicit PPDU Type switching November 2016 Explicit PPDU Type switching The responding STA can explicitly indicate the PPDU type for Control Response frames by: Based on the most recent individually addressed PPDU sent to the transmitting STA Switch takes effect similar to that of TOMI parameters E.g., after the end of the current TXOP Transmitting STA accounts for expected response type when calculating Duration/ID and TXOP_DURATION field values. PPDU format for control response stays in effect until a new value is indicated Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

BW selection for control frames November 2016 BW selection for control frames TXOP RTS 40 MHz RTS (A-)MPDU SIFS SIFS SIFS PIFS 20 MHz CTS PPDU Ack/BA (ED busy) Rules below are conceptually inline with 11ac behavior and Could apply to both 2.4GHz & 5Ghz, though WFA does not allow >20MHz op. in 2.4GHz Proposed rules for an HE STA: BW of control responses within a TXOP shall be same as the soliciting PPDU, except for: A CTS frame sent in response to RTS with Dynamic_BW or MU RTS in which case BW may be smaller Frames sent by TXOP holder may have smaller BW than previously TXed frames of that TXOP Note: This rule also applies to control responses sent by an AP as a response to a Trigger-based PPDU Bandwidth-signaling TA usage: An HE STA shall use BW-signaling TA for Control frames sent in >20MHz non-HT PPDUs An HE STA may use BW-signaling TA for Control frames sent in 20 MHz non-HT PPDUs An HE STA shall not use BW-signaling TA for other PPDU formats An HE STA should not transmit >20Mhz PPDUs in 2.4GHz Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.

MCS, NSS selection for control frames November 2016 MCS, NSS selection for control frames RTS (A-)MPDU 40 MHz RTS SIFS SIFS SIFS CTS PPDU Ack/BA CTS Ack/BA An HE STA shall follow the baseline <MCS, NSS> selection rules* except that: For Trigger-based PPDU it shall be determined by the soliciting Trigger or UL MU Response A-Control field For control frame sent in response to a Trigger-based PPDU it shall be a tuple supported by the intended RX(s) For a control frame sent in response to an ER SU PPDU it shall be equal to <MCS0, 1> An HE STA that sends a control frame in an ER SU PPDU format shall use: DCM encoding if the most recent successfully received PPDU sent by the HE STA to the soliciting STA after association used DCM; otherwise the STA shall not use DCM for the control frame. 106-tone ER SU PPDU if the most recent successfully received PPDU sent by the HE STA to the soliciting STA after association was a 106-tone ER SU PPDU. *Accounting for the addition of the <HE-MCS, NSS> in the <MCS, NSS> selection set Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.