The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Outline. Assembly procedure for tagger and vacuum chamber. Support stands. Alignment.
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
Electromagnetism and magnetic circuits.
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Progress of the BEPCII Injection System Kang Wen.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
Powered Magnets, DB Formation and Decelerator Alexey Vorozhtsov (JINR) International Workshop on Linear Colliders October 2010.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.
Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
STATUS REPORT ON DIPOLE MAGNETS FOR TRANSFER LINE-2 FOR CTF3 22 Jan 2008 S.S. PRABHU, A. K. JAIN & V. C. SAHNI RRCAT, INDORE (INDIA)
Design of DC septum magnets based on measurements and 3D calculation of an R&D septum magnet for Rapid Cycle Synchrotron of J-PARC Masao Watanabe, Accelerator.
SBS Magnet and Infrastructure Status Robin Wines July 2015.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
A Presentation On Construction Of Turbo Generator
Magnets Technologies for NOνA Transfer Line (& RR30 section) July 21-23, 2009.
Lecture 02Electro Mechanical System1 Assignment 1 Page 46, Problem 2.4, 2.5, 2.7 & 2.8 Due Date: Tuesday 1 st Feb, 2011.
BASIC ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY Chapter 4 – Magnetic Circuits
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
Magnets Attilio Milanese Doing Business with CERN
Design of wide aperture/thin septa of extraction system for J-PARC-50GeV ring 1. The outline of septa system for 50GeVring 2. Designing of thin septa and.
Internal Guide : Batch No : 4 Mrs.Punyavathi Madam
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
MSE Pulsed Septum for g-2 and Mu2e Design Review A. Makarov 2/11/2016.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
Panda Forward Dipole Magnet design status International Workshop on Antiproton Physics and Technology at FAIR November 2015 Budker Institute of Nuclear.
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
TPS pulse magnet measurement
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
BASIC ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY Chapter 4 – Magnetic Circuits
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Present status of the flux return yoke design
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Magnetic Circuits.
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
DOE/SC Status Review of 12 GeV SHMS HB Magnet: Update since Oct 2015
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
High Precision Magnet Production for NSLSII at IHEP
Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang*
INTRODUCTION OF ELECTRICAL MACHINES
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Electric Machine Design Course
Electric Machine Design Course
Presentation transcript:

The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets

1、Field quality of the CEPCB low field magnet For particle accelerator physics, three main specifications of dipole magnets are very important. Good field region and field uniformity. GFR: 52mm. Field uniformity: +/- 3E-4 Excitation curve and field reproducibility. Field reproducibility: 2E-4. Field non-linearity: 5%? Integral field difference from magnet to magnet. Field deviation: 5E-4

1、Field quality of the CEPCB low field magnet Because we don’t have BH curves of solid iron or steel laminations at very low field, we can’t simulate accurately the field quality of the CEPCB dipole magnet at low field. Fortunately, we were measuring the field of CSNS/RCS extraction Lambertson magnet by using the Hall probe field measurement system, so we have directly studied the field properties when it worked from 32Gs to 640Gs.

1、Field quality of the CEPCB low field magnet 1) Good field region and field uniformity The distributions of the field at 30Gs, 60Gs, 90Gs, 120Gs and 640Gs in the center of the Lambertson magnet have been measured. It can be seen that the lower the field, the worse the field uniformity. The field uniformity of 32Gs is 10 times worse than that of 640Gs.

1、Field quality of the CEPCB low field magnet 2) Excitation curve and field reproducibility Compared to the high field of 640Gs, non-linearity is serious at the low field of 32Gs, which reaches 23%. For conventional dipole magnets like for BEPCII storage ring, the non-linearity of the field was required to be less than 5%. The non-linearity of field means that the field can not change with excited current linearly. The waveform of the field will be deformed compared to that of the current. In order to decrease the non-linearity of the field down to 5%, the lowest field should be increased to 120Gs

1、Field quality of the CEPCB low field magnet 2) Excitation curve and field reproducibility Except the first cycle, the curves of the second and the third cycles seem overlapped very well. But when we check the difference point to point between the second and third cycle, the field difference or reproducibility is 0.5% at the low field of 30Gs. And in order to get the field reproducibility of 0.02%, the lowest field of the magnet should be higher than 120Gs. (The lowest field of dipole magnet for LHeC is 127Gs at injection energy of 10GeV.)

1、Field quality of the CEPCB low field magnet 3) Integral field difference from magnet to magnet Field difference from magnet to magnet is determined by properties deviation of core material (Hc), difference of core stacking factor and physical length. If the cores of magnets are made by steel laminations, the properties deviation of materials can be smoothened by lamination shuffling. The difference of core stacking factor and physical length could be controlled by the optimized procedures of core fabrication. However, if the field reproducibility can not reach 2E-4, the field difference between magnets can not reach 5E-4.

2、Design scheme of the LEP’s low field magnet 1) Main parameters of the LEP’s dipole magnet

2、Design scheme of the LEP’s low field magnet 2) Design scheme of the magnet Since the field was very low, LEP used the steel-concrete cores with the filling factor of 20% and hollow aluminium conductor coils to produce the main dipole magnets for its collider in 1980s. For safety consideration (production, lift and delivery), the length of each steel-concrete core was controlled within 5.75m, which was used as unit to assemble the magnets with required length in the tunnel. The coils of each pole had only one turn, which were welded by hollow aluminium conductors as long as the cores in the tunnel.

2、Design scheme of the LEP’s low field magnet 2) Design scheme of the magnet LEP’s six-core prototype dipole magnet.

3、Design scheme of the LHeC’s low field magnet 1) Main parameters of the magnet

3、Design scheme of the LHeC’s low field dipole magnet 2) Design scheme of the magnet Because of the very low magnetic field, the yoke is composed of silicon steel laminations interleaved with plastic spacers, with a thickness ratio between plastic and iron of 2:1. The coils of each pole had only one turn, which were welded by solid aluminium conductors.

3、Design scheme of the LHeC’s low field dipole magnet 2) Design scheme of the magnet A short prototype dipole magnet of LHeC. The laminations and plastic plates were glued together to form the core of the magnet.

4、CEPCB’s low field dipole magnet 1) Design of the prototype magnet The 4m long core has a H-type frame for better shielding of earth field. The core is made by silicon steel laminations. The coil (one turn per pole) is made by solid alumimium bars without water cooling. By using the supporters in the magnet gap to compensate the core weight and magnetic force, the return yoke of the core can be made as thin as possible. In the upper and lower pole areas of laminations, 8 rectangle holes and 2 round holes will be stamped to reduce the weight of the cores as well as to increase the field in the laminations.

4、CEPCB’s low field dipole magnet 1) Design of the prototype magnet In order to install the vacuum chamber, the core can be divided into upper and lower parts. Around the outside of each part, four long bars are used to wield the laminations of the half core together. In the round hole of each pole, there is another long bar to pressure pole part of the laminations together.

4、CEPCB’s low field dipole magnet 2) Field simulation of the prototype magnet The field simulations show that the magnetic fluxes are flowing in the laminations as expected. The holes in the pole areas can adjust and optimize the flux flowing very well. The field distribution curve along x direction shows that the field uniformity in the good field region is better than 3E-4

4、CEPCB’s low field dipole magnet 2) Field simulation of the prototype magnet The magnetic flux density in the most areas of the laminations is high than 3000Gs while field in the gap is 620Gs. The magnetic flux density in the most areas of the laminations is high than 150Gs while field in the gap is 30Gs. So the design of CEPCB dipole magnet with the holes in the pole areas as well as the thin return yokes can not only increase the magnetic flux density by 5 times and improve the field reproducibility, but also decrease the weight of the core and reduce cost of the magnet.

4、CEPCB’s low field dipole magnet 3) Designed parameters of the prototype magnet

5、Comparison of the low field dipole magnets